999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Human immunodeficiency virus patients with low CD4 counts are more likely to have precancerous polyps identified during index colonoscopy

2023-10-17 00:29:20MichelleLikhtshteynEvanMarzoukFrayArroyoMercadoGuraseesChawlaSabrinaRosengartenRenataLererHectorOjedaMartinezSavannaThor

Michelle Likhtshteyn,Evan Marzouk,Fray M Arroyo-Mercado,Gurasees Chawla,Sabrina Rosengarten,Renata Lerer,Hector Ojeda-Martinez,Savanna Thor

Abstract BACKGROUND Antiretroviral treatment (ART) has improved the life expectancy of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).As these patients age,they are at increased risk for developing non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome defining malignancies (NADMs) such as colon cancers.AIM To determine which factors are associated with the development of precancerous polyps on screening colonoscopy in patients with HIV and to investigate whether HIV disease status,measured by viral load and CD4 count,might influence precancerous polyp development.METHODS A retrospective review of records at two urban academic medical centers was performed for HIV patients who had a screening colonoscopy between 2005-2015.Patients with a history of colorectal cancer or polyps,poor bowel preparation,or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.Demographic data such as sex,age,race,and body mass index (BMI) as well as information regarding the HIV disease status such as CD4 count,viral load,and medication regimen were collected.Well-controlled patients were defined as those that had viral load < 50 copies,and poorly-controlled patients were those with viral load ≥ 50.Patients were also stratified based on their CD4 count,comparing those with a low CD4 count to those with a high CD4 count.Using colonoscopy reports in the medical record,the size,histology,and number of polyps were recorded for each patient.Precancerous polyps included adenomas and proximal serrated polyps.Data was analyzed using Fisher’s exact tests and logistic regression through SAS 3.8 software.RESULTS Two hundred and seven patients met our inclusion criteria.The mean age was 56.13 years,and 58% were males.There were no significant differences in terms of age,race or ethnicity,insurance,and smoking status between patients with CD4 counts above or below 500.BMI was lower in patients with CD4 count < 500 as compared to those with count > 500 (P=0.0276).In patients with CD4 > 500,53.85% of patients were female,and 70.87% of patients with CD4 < 500 were male (P=0.0004).Only 1.92% of patients with CD4 ≥ 500 had precancerous polyps vs 10.68% of patients with CD4 < 500 (P=0.0102).When controlled for sex,BMI,and ART use,patients with CD4 <500 were 9.01 times more likely to have precancerous polyps [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-47.97;P=0.0100].Patients taking non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were also found to be 10.23 times more likely to have precancerous polyps (95%CI: 1.08-97.15;P=0.0428).There was not a significant difference noted in precancerous polyps between those that had viral loads greater or less than 50 copies.CONCLUSION Patients with low CD4 counts were more likely to have precancerous polyps on their screening colonoscopy although the etiology for this association is unclear.We also found an increased risk of precancerous polyps in patients taking non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,which is contradictory to prior literature showing ART has decreased the risk of development of NADMs.However,there have not been studies looking at colorectal cancer and ART by drug class,to our knowledge.Further prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of HIV control and therapies on polyp development.

Key Words: Colonoscopy;Non-acquired immunodeficiency syndromes defining malignancies;Human immunodeficiency virus;Adenoma detection rate;Antiretroviral treatment;Advanced adenoma

INTRODUCTION

Antiretroviral therapy has dramatically changed and improved the life expectancy of patients coping with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).With the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in 1996,the worldwide life expectancy of HIV-infected people has improved significantly.As the HIV disease state is being better controlled with ART,this patient population is at lower risk for developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining illnesses.However,as these patients live longer,they become vulnerable to developing non-AIDS defining malignancies(NADMs) such as colon cancers[1].In 1994,Klugman and Schaffner[2] published a case report of a 25-year-old African American man with HIV who was found to have an advanced right sided colonic adenocarcinoma postmortem.At that time,ART therapy had not yet been introduced or widely accepted,and it was thought that the most significant manifestation of HIV in the gastrointestinal tract was Kaposi’s sarcoma[2].However,even Krugman postulated that HIV might play a role in the development of colon cancer.

While some studies have shown that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) decreases the risk of developing colorectal cancer[3],other studies propose that HIV patients are at higher risk and develop colorectal cancer at younger ages[4,5].Conversely,other studies have shown that the rates of colorectal cancer are similar between people with and without HIV[6].According to current guidelines,HIV infection does not change the age at which screening colonoscopies are performed.A consensus regarding HIV infection and colonic neoplasms has not been reached,possibly due to a paucity of data regarding these two diseases.We aimed to identify which factors are associated with the development of precancerous polyps on index (first) screening colonoscopy in patients with HIV and to investigate whether HIV disease status,measured by viral load and CD4 count,may influence precancerous polyp growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records at Kings County Hospital and SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University for patients with HIV who had received a screening colonoscopy between 2005 and 2015 was performed.Patient demographics were collected,HIV disease status was documented,and information regarding the colonoscopy was collected.Important factors from the colonoscopy data included the types of polyps,if a polypectomy were performed,if a diagnosis of advanced adenoma was made,or if a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was made.

Patients with a known history of malignancy,history of colon polyps,inflammatory bowel disease,active gastrointestinal infection,and poor bowel preparation were excluded,as were patients undergoing colonoscopy for surveillance or diagnostic purposes.Data collected for each patient included age,biological sex,ethnicity,age at colonoscopy,body mass index (BMI) at time of colonoscopy,alcohol history use,tobacco use,diabetes history,year of HIV diagnosis,duration in years of HIV diagnosis at time of colonoscopy,CD4 count nadir,CD4 count value closest to colonoscopy date,viral load value closest to colonoscopy date,and ART therapy regimen.Colonoscopy data was collected including the date of colonoscopy,colonoscopy type (screening/diagnostic),proceduralist,family history of polyps,history of polyps or colon cancer,biopsy information (if any),polyp type,polyp size,determination of adenoma,designation of advanced adenoma,diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or anal cancer,quality of preparation,withdrawal time greater than 6 min,and type of anesthesia.Advanced adenomas were categorized as adenomatous polyps being > 1 cm,having greater than 3 adenomas,and/or having a sessile serrated adenoma.

The baseline characteristics and prevalence of polyps in HIV disease groups (based on the viral load and/or CD4 count definitions) were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Fisher’s exact tests.For the two groups based on CD4 count,a logistic regression controlling for BMI,sex,and medications while looking at the odds of precancerous polyps was run.All statistics were performed using SAS Studio 3.8 software.

Patients were categorized into two groups based on their HIV disease state.They were determined to be either wellcontrolled HIV or poorly-controlled HIV patients (using viral load as a designation) and using CD4 count where patients were determined to be controlled or uncontrolled using a CD4 cutoff of 500.HIV patients determined to be wellcontrolled/controlled were likened to the general population and served as a control group (Figure 1).

RESULTS

HIV viral load for designation of well-controlled vs poorly-controlled HIV

A total of 370 records were reviewed.Of these patients,163 were excluded due to having either a diagnostic colonoscopy,surveillance colonoscopy,or poor preparation.In total,207 patients were found to have screening colonoscopies with good or excellent prep (Boston Bowel Prep Score > 7) and met our inclusion criteria.The mean age of our patient population was 56.13 years;58% of our patients were male.Patients were divided into two separate groups based on their HIV disease state using viral load.Patients were denoted to be well-controlled based on a viral load < 50 copies/mL and poorly-controlled if their viral load was > 50 copies/mL.Based on these criteria,we had a total of 133 well-controlled patients and 74 poorly-controlled HIV patients.Using these two defined groups,baseline characteristics between them were compared.

Baseline characteristics between these two groups including age,sex,race,ethnicity,history of diabetes,smoking status,and insurance were not found to be statistically significant.However,the average BMI in well-controlled patients was found to be higher (27.8 kg/m2) than the average (25.9 kg/m2) in poorly-controlled HIV patients (P=0.0207).See Table 1 for baseline characteristics.

At an alpha level of 0.05,the prevalence of polyps in both groups was not significantly different.Among the patients with well-controlled HIV,13% had polyps,while 8% of patients in the poorly-controlled group had polyps.In the wellcontrolled group,7.52% of patients had precancerous polyps,and 4.05% of poorly-controlled patients had precancerous polyps.Advanced and right colon adenomas were also found more often in the well-controlled group (5% and 4%vs1%and 0%,respectively).However,this was not a significant difference.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics for CD4 count < 500 and CD4 count > 500 groups

CD4 count for designation of controlled vs uncontrolled HIV

There is some debate as to whether HIV viral load or CD4 count is the best stratifier to use for HIV disease progression[7-9].Thus,we also analyzed the effect of CD4 count on polyp prevalence.To designate controlled and uncontrolled HIV,we used a CD4 count cutoff value of 500 cells/μL.Patients with a CD4 count > 500 cells/μL were considered to have controlled HIV while those with a CD4 count equal to or less than 500 cells/μL were considered to have uncontrolled HIV.Using these cutoff values,104 patients met the criteria for controlled HIV and 103 met the criteria for uncontrolled HIV.With this definition,there were significant differences in the baseline characteristics of sex as well as BMI.As above,BMI was significantly higher in the controlled group (28 kg/m2vs26.2 kg/m2).Additionally,there was a significantly greater proportion of males in the uncontrolled group (71%) as opposed to the controlled group (46%).

The uncontrolled group had significantly more polyps and precancerous polyps than the controlled group.Among the patients with uncontrolled HIV,17% had any polyp on colonoscopy,while only 5% of patients with controlled HIV had any polyp.Precancerous polyps were also more likely to be found in the uncontrolled group (11%)vsthe controlled group (2%).There were no significant differences in the prevalence of adenomas or other polyp types between the two groups.

Finally,a logistic regression demonstrated that the odds of precancerous polyps was 9.01 times greater [95%confidence interval (CI): 1.69-47.97] in the uncontrolled group than in the controlled group after adjusting for BMI,sex,and medication types.Of note,non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were also associated with increased odds of precancerous polyps (odds ratio: 10.23;95%CI: 1.08-97.15) (Figure 2).

DlSCUSSlON

Using CD4 count > 500 cells/μL as controlled HIV and CD4 count < 500 cells/μL as uncontrolled HIV,there was a significant association between HIV control and precancerous polyp presence.However,when using viral load < 50 copies for the definition of well-controlledvspoorly-controlled,there was not a significant difference in precancerous polyps noted.It was important to investigate these relationships using both viral load and CD4 count as disease status markers because there is debate as to which criteria is superior to demonstrate HIV disease status[9].Using CD4 count,BMI was again found to be significantly different between the controlled (n=104) and uncontrolled (n=103) HIV groups(P=0.0276).

Interestingly,using CD4 counts to compare groups,53.85% of controlled patients were females,and 70.87% of uncontrolled patients were males (P=0.0004).In the controlled group,1.92% of patients were found to have precancerous polyps,while 10.68% of uncontrolled patients had precancerous polyps,(P=0.0102) (Table 2).In a logistic regression thatwas performed to control for and assess the effects of sex,BMI,and antiretroviral use,uncontrolled patients were 9.01 times more likely to have precancerous polyps identified on their colonoscopy (95%CI: 1.69-47.97) (P=0.0100).Patients taking NNRTIs were also found to be 10.23 times more likely to have precancerous polyps (95%CI: 1.08-97.15) (P=0.0428)(Table 3).No significant differences were found with other types of HAART medicines.However,it is important to consider that HAART therapy combines multiple medicines.

Table 2 Fisher’s exact two-sided tests for the incidence of polyps in the CD4 count > 500 and CD4 count < 500 groups

Figure 1 Patient inclusion flow chart showing number of patients reviewed and division of human immunodeficiency virus groups based on viral load and CD4 count.

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) for our HIV population was found to be 3.3%,which is seemingly low.However,in similar studies of HIV patients performed in urban academic centers,ADRs ranged between 6.6%-7.8%,and these studies included screening,diagnostic,and surveillance colonoscopies[3,5,6].It is likely that if other types of colonoscopies such as diagnostic and surveillance were included in our study,our ADR would have been higher.Ultimately,institutions with large HIV patient populations or specialized HIV care may consider further investigating these complex relations,asthis would help to increase the study ADR.

Table 3 Logistic regression of HIV control and precancerous polyps controlling for other variables

Using viral load to determine our two HIV groups,we found no differences in precancerous polyp detection.However,using CD4 count to determine the two groups,we found a significant difference,with uncontrolled patients having more precancerous polyps.Prospective studies involving HIV patients undergoing screening colonoscopy should be performed where CD4 count and HIV viral load are recorded on the day of procedure in order to better classify patients in terms of their disease status as it may relate to their findings on colonoscopy.

Our analysis also suggested an increased risk of precancerous polyps in patients who were taking NNRTIs.Most literature supports the concept that HAART has decreased the risk of HIV patients ever developing NADMs[2,6];however,there have not been studies analyzing colorectal cancer development and HAART by drug class or drug combination.It is unclear what the mechanism of action may be regarding the use of NNRTIs and polyp growth.A study conducted by Chaoet al[10] at Kaiser Permanente suggested that for patients with long-term use of protease inhibitors,there was an associated higher risk of anal cancer[10].That same study did not show any association between NRRTI use and anal cancer.Similarly,a study by Pikettyet al[11] also reported an increased anal cancer risk in HAART users,suggesting that ART therapy does not appear to prevent anal cancer.While anal cancer,advanced polyps,and colon cancer all have different pathogeneses,we highlighted that there is still work to be done to understand the mechanism behind neoplasm development in HIV patients.

Future studies need to be performed to determine if any specific HAART regimen might impact colorectal cancer development.Conversely,some studies have shown that the occurrence of NADMs has increased since the introduction of HAART in 1996.Prior studies show an association between NNRTI use and NADMs[12].While HAART does not have a direct effect on host DNA,there is substantial evidence that HAART alters gut microbiota[13],which may serve as a theoretical mechanism for the increased ADR in patients on NNRTIs.In addition,it is possible that the use of NNRTIs may increase NADMs by increasing lifespan of HIV patients and the rate of obesity,both of which may contribute to adenomatous polyp development.

CONCLUSION

In our study,we found there was an increased rate of precancerous polyps in patients who had lower CD4 counts and those taking NNRTIs.While the overall precancerous polyp and ADR was low in this population,further studies are needed to elucidate the possible mechanism of these differences.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

Antiretroviral therapies have improved the life expectancy of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).As these patients live longer,they can develop non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome defining malignancies such as colon cancers.

Research motivation

Some studies have shown that highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) decreases the risk of developing colorectal cancer,while other studies propose that HIV patients are at higher risk and develop colorectal cancer at younger ages.There is no recommendation in gastrointestinal guidelines regarding special screening ages for HIV patients.

Research objectives

Our objective was to identify which factors are associated with the development of precancerous polyps on index screening colonoscopy in patients with HIV and to investigate whether HIV disease severity,measured by viral load and CD4 count,might impact adenoma growth.

Research methods

A retrospective review of electronic medical charts at Kings County Hospital and SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University for patients with HIV who had received a screening colonoscopy between 2005 and 2015 was performed.

Research results

We determined there was an increased rate of precancerous polyps in patients who had lower CD4 counts and those taking non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Research conclusions

We determined there was a relationship between HIV disease status and precancerous polys found on colonoscopy.Further studies need to be done to further explore this relationship in patients with HIV.

Research perspectives

Further studies and work need to be done to determine if any specific HAART regimen might impact colorectal cancer development.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Likhtshteyn M,Marzouk E,Arroyo-Mercado FM,Chawla G,and Lerer R contributed equally to this work;Thor S was the research mentor specializing in gastroenterology;Ojeda-Martinez H was the research mentor specializing in Infectious Diseases and HIV;Rosengarten S performed statistical analysis;Likhtshteyn M,Marzouk M,Rosengarten S,and Thor S wrote the manuscript;Likhtshteyn M and Thor S were responsible for revising the manuscript;All authors read and approved the final version.

Institutional review board statement:The project,“Adenoma prevalence,characteristics,and outcomes on screening colonoscopy in patients with HIV in an Urban Safety Net Hospital and Urban University Hospital” was approved by SUNY Downstate Health Sciences IRB on October 13,2020,No.1306045.

Informed consent statement:All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrollment.

Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors declare having no conflicts of interest for this article.

Data sharing statement:Please contact mlikhtsh@gmail.com for all statistical requests.

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:United States

ORCID number:Michelle Likhtshteyn 0009-0007-9894-0760.

S-Editor:Fan JR

L-Editor:Filipodia

P-Editor:Fan JR

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品手机在线观看你懂的| 国产麻豆福利av在线播放| 精品国产免费人成在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区香蕉| 九九久久精品国产av片囯产区| 精品91视频| 久久综合国产乱子免费| 三上悠亚精品二区在线观看| 国内嫩模私拍精品视频| 久久久久国产精品熟女影院| 尤物成AV人片在线观看| 精品无码国产自产野外拍在线| 2020最新国产精品视频| 亚洲爱婷婷色69堂| 亚洲无码高清免费视频亚洲| 国产精品福利在线观看无码卡| 久久综合九色综合97婷婷| 国产精品毛片一区视频播| 青青草国产在线视频| 丁香婷婷在线视频| 亚洲激情区| 国产精品性| 高清免费毛片| 午夜精品一区二区蜜桃| 中国国语毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲人成人无码www| 亚洲国产精品不卡在线| 四虎亚洲国产成人久久精品| 99九九成人免费视频精品| 色亚洲成人| 美女无遮挡免费视频网站| 日韩毛片免费观看| 中文字幕佐山爱一区二区免费| 最新无码专区超级碰碰碰| 久久这里只精品国产99热8| 老汉色老汉首页a亚洲| 免费全部高H视频无码无遮掩| 国产在线自乱拍播放| 99爱视频精品免视看| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片不卡| 亚洲中文在线看视频一区| 99精品伊人久久久大香线蕉| 91福利一区二区三区| 久久久久久午夜精品| av一区二区无码在线| av一区二区三区高清久久| 无遮挡国产高潮视频免费观看| 国产精品xxx| 伊人天堂网| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码av喷潮| 国产黑丝一区| 日韩精品一区二区三区swag| 激情视频综合网| 国产经典在线观看一区| 无码AV高清毛片中国一级毛片| 91亚洲免费视频| 伊人色在线视频| 日韩高清欧美| 一级爆乳无码av| 热九九精品| 国产九九精品视频| 精品国产黑色丝袜高跟鞋| 波多野结衣一区二区三区AV| 亚洲欧洲日韩久久狠狠爱| 久久久久青草大香线综合精品| 伊人激情久久综合中文字幕| 青青青伊人色综合久久| 日本精品中文字幕在线不卡| 婷婷综合色| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区z| 日韩A∨精品日韩精品无码| 97免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美综合另类图片小说区| 青青网在线国产| 特级精品毛片免费观看| 亚洲成年网站在线观看| 国产成人精品一区二区三区| 亚欧美国产综合| 热99精品视频| 小说区 亚洲 自拍 另类| 国产一级毛片在线| 日韩成人免费网站|