


[摘要] 目的 探討口腔正畸治療牙周病的臨床療效。方法 隨機(jī)選擇該院從2014年3月—2015年10月收治的72例牙周病患者,隨機(jī)分為觀察組和對照組,各36例。對照組給予常規(guī)治療,觀察組給予常規(guī)治療與正畸治療。比較兩組治療效果及牙齦指數(shù)、牙周袋深度、前牙覆蓋、牙齦乳頭探診出血指數(shù)、牙齒松動度。結(jié)果 觀察組總有效率為97.22%,對照組為77.78%,觀察組有效率明顯高于對照組(P<0.05)。治療后,觀察組牙齦指數(shù)(0.71±0.21)、牙周袋深度(2.98±1.01) mm、前牙覆蓋(3.14±1.23) mm、牙齦乳頭探診出血指數(shù)(1.01±0.51)、牙齒松動度(0.19±0.12)均明顯低于對照組(1.60±0.87)、(4.63±1.12) mm、(4.66±1.42) mm、(1.41±0.39)、(0.26±0.22),差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論 口腔正畸治療牙周病的療效確切,可明顯改善患者臨床癥狀,矯正其牙齒,改善牙齦指數(shù),值得推廣。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 口腔;正畸治療;牙周病
[中圖分類號] R781 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2016)10(b)-0088-03
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect analysis of orthodontic treatment on periodontal disease. Methods Random selection 72 cases on periodontal disease divided into observation group(36cases) and control group(36cases) randomly, from Marth 2014 to October 2015. The control groups were treated with routine therapy, and the others with routine therapy and orthodontic treatment. Compared difference effec between the two groups,and gingival index, periodontal pocket depth, anterior teeth coverage, bleeding index, tooth mobility. Results The effective rate of the observation group(97.22%) was significantly higher than the control group(77.78%), the gingival index, periodontal pocket depth, anterior tooth coverage,bleeding indexand tooth mobility in the diagnosis and treatment of gingival papilla in the observation group[(0.71±0.21),(2.98±1.01) mm,(3.14±1.23) mm,(1.01±0.51), (0.19±0.12)] were significantly lower than those in the control group[(1.60±0.87),( 4.63±1.12) mm,(4.66±1.42) mm,(1.41±0.39),(0.26±0.22)]. Conclusion Orthodontic treatment of periodontal disease is effective, can significantly improve the patient's clinical symptoms, correct their teeth, improve the gum index, it worthy promoting.
[Key words] Oral cavity; Orthodontic treatment; Periodontal disease
牙周病是臨床常見疾病,早期癥狀輕微,患者常不給予重視,隨著病情發(fā)展,會引起牙齒松動脫落、牙周組織感染、口腔咀嚼功能障礙、牙缺失等并發(fā)癥,不僅影響患者的生活質(zhì)量,而且牙缺失還可影響患者的牙齒美觀[1]。牙周病的常規(guī)治療方法包括牙周基礎(chǔ)治療、藥物治療等,但尚無特效治療方法。該院對2014年3月—2015年10月收治的72例牙周病患者采用正畸治療和常規(guī)治療,該文對其治療效果進(jìn)行比較,現(xiàn)報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
隨機(jī)選擇該院收治的72例牙周病患者,隨機(jī)分為觀察組和對照組,各36例。觀察組36例中,男性21例,女性15例,年齡27~51歲,平均(37.29±2.33)歲,病程2個月~5年,平均(2.41±0.87)年;對照組36例中,男性20例,女性156例,年齡26~53歲,平均(37.85±2.41)歲,病程2個月~6年,平均(2.56±0.93)年。……