Relationship measurement between ac-Stark shift of 40Ca+clock transition and laser polarization direction?

Hong-Fang Song(宋紅芳),Shao-Long Chen(陳邵龍),Meng-Yan Zeng(曾孟彥),Yao Huang(黃垚), Hu Shao(邵虎),Yong-Bo Tang(唐永波),Hua Guan(管樺),and Ke-Lin Gao(高克林),?

1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics,Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

2 Key Laboratory of Atomic Frequency Standards,Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

3 Center for Cold Atom Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

5 College of Physics and Materials Science,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China

Relationship measurement between ac-Stark shift of40Ca+clock transition and laser polarization direction?

Hong-Fang Song(宋紅芳)1,2,3,4,Shao-Long Chen(陳邵龍)1,2,3,4,Meng-Yan Zeng(曾孟彥)1,2,3,4,Yao Huang(黃垚)1,2,3, Hu Shao(邵虎)1,2,3,4,Yong-Bo Tang(唐永波)5,Hua Guan(管樺)1,2,3,and Ke-Lin Gao(高克林)1,2,3,?

1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics,Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

2 Key Laboratory of Atomic Frequency Standards,Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

3 Center for Cold Atom Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,China

4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

5 College of Physics and Materials Science,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China

Ac-Stark shift of atom levels is caused by an ac-electromagnetic field.As an electromagnetic wave,laser light does induce ac-Stark shift.It is proved experimentally that if the light is linearly polarized,the dynamic polarizability changes with polarization direction.The polarization direction of the linearly-polarized laser is tuned by 720°,and the ac-Stark shifts of the 4S1/2,m=±1/2→3D5/2,m=±1/2clock transitions in40Ca+are measured in steps of 10°.The frequency shifts change with laser polarization in a periodical manner and have values opposite to each other.

clock transition,ac-Stark shift,laser polarization direction

1.Introduction

Polarizability is an intrinsic property of atoms,which determines how the atoms respond to an external field dynamically.Studying the polarizability of atoms is indeed helpul in many fields.[1–17]Research on the dynamic polarizability of atoms or ions will provide knowledge of the magic wavelength[1–8]corresponding to relevant transitions.Blackbody shift of the clock transition frequency can be evaluated through its static polarizability.[9–13]The dynamic polarizability is also helpful in constructing the long-rangepotential which is crucial in Bose–Einstein condensation,[14]cold and ultracold collisions,[16]and ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy.[17]The laser used in transition frequency measurement will introduce ac-Stark shift,which is unavoidable,by changing the dynamic polarizability.[9–13]

For a given state of an atom or ion,denoted as d,with angular momentum and angular momentum projections denoted as j and m,an electromagnetic field brings a shift in energy as given as[1,4,6–8]

where E is the amplitude of the electric field,which alters with a frequency of ω.The dynamic polarizability becomes static one as the frequency ω becomes zero,which means that the electric field is constant.The dynamic polarizability can be expressed as[1,4,6–8]

We have measured the frequency shifts of thetransitions at the magic wavelength[7,8,18,19]of this transition couple in40Ca+.The average of these two shifts stays at the constant value of zero but each single shift changes periodically with the angle between polarization direction of the linearly-polarized laser and the z axis.This means that the magic wavelength is“magic”to just the average frequency shift of those two transitions andnot“magic”to each single one.The frequency shifts of these two transitions can reach the same value of zero at a certain polarized angle of the laser light.In magic wavelength measurement,if we set the laser’s polarized angle at this value, it will take us less time to reach the same precision than in Ref.[18].

It is not specific for magic wavelength that the frequency shift changes with the polarized angle of the light periodically. If we change the wavelength of the laser light,the average frequency shift will also stay constant but not at zero and each single shift will change periodically in the constant center.In the transition frequency measurement,the ac-Stark shift is unavoidable for the use of several laser beams.Research on the relationship between frequency shift and laser polarization direction will improve the precision of the transition frequency measurement.

2.Experimental setup

A partial level scheme of40Ca+is depicted in Fig.1, showing the relevant energy levels and transitions.Because of the magnetic field,each level splits into several Zeeman sub-levels marked with magnetic quantum number on the right side.As a result,the clock transition splits into ten Zeeman components.The two components corresponding to 3D5/2,m=|1/2|are sketched in solid lines,of which the frequency shifts are measured under the effect of the laser field at the magic wavelength corresponding to thetransition.

Fig.1.(color online)Relevant energy levels and transitions of 40Ca+. Because of the Zeeman effect,all levels split into several Zeeman sublevels.The 397-nm laser is the cooling laser.The 866-nm laser is used for repumping the ion scattered into 3D3/2 state back to 4P1/2 for continuous cooling.The 854-nm light is used for quenching ion in 3D5/2 state to ground state.The 729-nm transition is the optical clock transition and with magnetic field applied,the clock transition splits into ten Zeeman components.

Fig.2.(color online)Schematic diagram of experimental system.AOM:acousto–optic modulator,λ/2:1/2 wave plate,ECDL: external-cavity diode laser.Light from 395-nm diode laser is diffracted by grating.Zero-order diffraction component is guided into the wavelength meter and the first-order one is for the experiment.

The experimental setup is briefly sketched in Fig.2. At the top right corner,the direction of magnet is indicated clearly,which is in the vertical plane and has an angle of 39.8°with respect to a wave vector of 729-nm laser.The 395-nm laser part is a little different from that in our former work as reported in Ref.[19].The first-ordercomponentofthe 395-nm laser diffracted by a grating is selected for the experiment and leads to the trap in the opposite direction of 729-nm laser.The shutter(SRS,SR475)after the grating is used for switching the light on and off.The Glan prisms located in front of and behind the fiber are used for diminishing the power variation of the laser.A half-wave plate is used in front of the ion trap to change the laserpolarization direction.None of the probe laser (729 nm),cooling laser(397 nm),repumping laser(866 nm), and quenching laser(854 nm)are depicted in detail,and their descriptions can be found in our previous work.[9,22,23]The line-width of 729-nm laser is measured to be less than 1 Hz and the stability is measured to be less than 2×10?15at 1– 30 s.The 397-and 866-nm lasers are frequency stabilized with transfer cavities,[24]taking the probe laser(729 nm)as reference and the long-term drift is reduced to within 10 MHz for 4 h.The 395-nm laser runs freely and the frequency drift is within 100 MHz for 4 h.Power variation of the laser is reduced to less than 4%for 5 h,monitored by the power meter PM100USB from Thorlabs.

3.Experimental procedure

A single40Ca+ion is trapped in a miniature Paul trap and Doppler cooled with the 397-nm cooling laser and the 866-nm repumping laser.The excess micromotion of the ion is reduced by optimizing the voltages applied to the compensating electrodes.The ion temperature is minimized to a few mK and the ion can be trapped for several days.The pulse sequence used in our experiment is similar to the one used in our clock frequency measurement.[9,22,23]In the cooling process,the 854-nm laser is switched on for 1 ms as shown in Fig.3 to guarantee that the ion is in the ground state.After 3 ms,the counter is triggered on to record the photon counts. Then the probe light(729 nm)compensated for by an acoustooptic modulator(AOM)is switched on to pump the ion into the 3D5/2state and frequency of the AOM is recorded by the computer.The counter starts once again after 4 ms.If the counts are as few as background counts,the ion is pumped into the metastable state successfully.That is to say,a quantum jump happens.The sequence is repeated 30 times and if quantum jumps happen,the probe laser is locked to the clock transition successfully.The magic wavelength about 395 nm is applied together with 729-nm laser subsequently.The time sequence with 395-nm light is carried out30 times to lock the probe light to the clock transition too.The difference between frequencies with and without the 395-nm laser gives us the frequency shift caused by the 395-nm laser.The time sequence runs with or without the 395-nm laser for about 20 min respectively;about 50 values of frequency shift are recorded in each polarization direction of the 395-nm laser.The half wave plate is rotated 360°in steps of 5°during the measurement.

Fig.3.(color online)Simplified sequence for our experiment.We lock our probe laser to two of the Zeeman components of clock transition with and without 395-nm laser,the frequency difference gives the frequency shift from 395-nm laser,corresponding to andtransitions.

Fig.4.(color online)Relationships between frequency shift and polarization angle of 395-nm light for different cases.Each point is averaged over 50 measurements.The red point gives the frequency shift of 4S1/2,m=?1/2→3D5/2,m=?1/2 transition and the blue one shows the frequency shift of 4S1/2,m=+1/2→3D5/2,m=+1/2 transition.Both the red and the blue points go periodically and they have the opposite values at each angle.The black dot refers to averaged values of red and blue ones.Only statistics error is considered here,which is no more than 0.8 and cannot be drawn obviously.

Under the effect of magic wavelength light,the average of frequency shifts of 4S1/2,m=?1/2→3D5/2,m=?1/2and 4S1/2,m=+1/2→3D5/2,m=+1/2transition stay at the constant value of zero as shown in Fig.4.While,the frequency shifts of a single transition(4S1/2,m=?1/2→3D5/2,m=?1/2or 4S1/2,m=+1/2→3D5/2,m=+1/2transition)change with the polarized angle of the 395-nm laser periodically and have values opposite to each other.

4.Conclusions and outlook

We measure the frequency shifts of a couple of clock transitions corresponding to 3D5/2,m=±1/2with different laser polarizations directions at the magic wavelength of thetransition couple.Frequency shifts change with laser polarization periodically and have opposite values constantly.Rotating the polarizer to a certain angle precisely which is about 12.5°or 145°here,both of the shifts go to zero.If the polarizer is fixed at the angles,“four point locking scheme”[25,26]can be replaced with“two point locking scheme”in magic wavelength measurement,which will take less time to achieve the same accuracy.

In the transition frequency measurement,the lasers used in probing will cause ac-Stark shifts.The average shift of a transition coupled with the same values of angular momentum j and absolute value of angular momentum projection m is constant but not zero.Each single shift corresponding to either of the transition couples will change in a periodical manner with laser polarization direction in the constant center.If the relationship between shift and laser direction is measured specifically,then a certain direction can be chosen to lead to the smallest ac-Stark shift during single transition frequency measurement.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Tang L and Li C for our fruitful discussions and also to Huang X,Shu H,Guo B,Liu Q,Cao J,and Liu P for their establishment of the experimental setup.

[1]Singh S,Sahoo B K and Arora B 2016 Phys.Rev.A 93 063422

[2]Adhikari C M,Kawasaki A and Jentschura U D 2016 Phys.Rev.A 94 032510

[3]Goldschmidt E A,Norris D G,Koller S B,Wyllie R,Brown R C,Porto J V,Safronova U I and Safronova M S 2015 Phys.Rev.A 91 032518

[4]Sahoo B K and Arora B 2013 Phys.Rev.A 87 023402

[5]Safronova M S,Safronova U I and Clark C W 2012 Phys.Rev.A 86 042505

[6]Arora B,Safronova M S and Clark C W 2007 Phys.Rev.A 76 052509

[7]Kaur J,Singh S,Arora B and Sahoo B K 2015 Phys.Rev.A 92 031402

[8]Tang Y B,Qiao H X,Shi T Y and Mitroy J 2013 Phys.Rev.A 87 042517

[9]Huang Y,Guan H,Liu P,Bian W,Ma L,Liang K,Li T and Gao K 2016 Phys.Rev.Lett.116 013001

[10]Rosenband T,Hume D B,Schmidt P O,Chou C W,Brusch A,Lorini L,Oskay W H,Drullinger R E,Fortier T M,Stalnaker J E,Diddams S A,Swann W C,Newbury N R,Itano W M,Wineland D J and Bergquist J C 2008 Science 319 1808

[11]Chou C W,Hume D B,Koelemeij J C J,Wineland D J and Rosenband T 2010 Phys.Rev.Lett.104 070802

[12]Bloom B J,Nicholson T L,Williams J R,Campbell S L,Bishof M, Zhang X,Zhang W,Bromley S L and Ye J 2014 Nature 506 71

[13]Nicholson T L,Campbell S L,Hutson R B,Marti G E,Bloom B J,Mc-Nally R L,Zhang W,Barrett M D,Safronova M S,Strouse G F,Tew W L and Ye J 2015 Nat.Commun.6 6896

[14]Leggett A J 2001 Rev.Mod.Phys.73 307

[15]Leggett A J 2003 Rev.Mod.Phys.75 1083

[16]Weiner J,Bagnato V S,Zilio S and Julienne P S 1999 Rev.Mod.Phys. 71 1

[17]Jones K M,Tiesinga E,Lett P D and Julienne P S 2006 Rev.Mod.Phys. 78 483

[18]Liu P L,Huang Y,Bian W,Shao H,Guan H,Tang Y B,Li C B,Mitroy J and Gao K L 2015 Phys.Rev.Lett.114 223001

[19]Liu P L,Huang Y,Bian W,Shao H,Qian Y,Guan H,Tang L Y and Gao K L 2015 Chin.Phys.B 24 039501

[20]Arora B and Sahoo B K 2012 Phys.Rev.A 86 033416

[21]Lepers M,Wyart J F and Dulieu O 2014 Phys.Rev.A 89 022505

[22]Huang Y,Cao J,Liu P,Liang K,Ou B,Guan H,Huang X,Li T and Gao K 2012 Phys.Rev.A 85 030503

[23]Huang Y,Liu Q,Cao J,Ou B,Liu P,Guan H,Huang X and Gao K 2011 Phys.Rev.A 84 053841

[24]Qu W C,Huang Y,Guan H,Huang X R and Gao K L 2011 Chin.J. Lasers 38 0802008

[25]Bernard J E,Madej A A,Marmet L,Whitford B G,Siemsen K J and Cundy S 1999 Phys.Rev.Lett.82 3228

[26]Barwood G,Gao K,Gill P,Huang G and Klein H A 2001 IEEE Trans. Instrum.Meas.50 543

4 April 2017;revised manuscript

23 May 2017;published online 27 July 2017)

10.1088/1674-1056/26/9/099501

?Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.91336211,11634013,11622434,11474318,and 11504094)and the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No.XDB21030000).

?Corresponding author.E-mail:klgao@wipm.ac.cn

?2017 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd http://iopscience.iop.org/cpb http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn