The use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Eric H.Kim,John A.Brockman,Gerald L.Andriole＊

Division of Urologic Surgery,Washington University School of Medicine,St.Louis,MO,USA

1.Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a common problem among men aged over 50 years and its prevalence increases with age [1,2].Characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS),enlarged prostate size,and decreased urinary flow rate,the progressive nature of BPH can be quantified by increases in LUTS severity according to the International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),deterioration in peak urinary flow rate(Qmax),episodes of acute urinary retention(AUR),or the need for BPH-related surgery[3].

Prostate volume appears to be the greatest risk factor associated with BPH progression,as men with prostate volumes of 30 mL or greater have a 3-4 times higher likelihood of moderate-to-severe LUTS as de fined by the IPSS,2-3 times higher incidence of reduced Qmax,and 3-4 times higher likelihood to experience AUR when compared to men with prostate volumes less than 30 mL[4].Increasing prostate volume is also associated with the need for BPH-related surgery[5].Serum prostate-specific antigen(PSA),as a biomarker for prostate volume,appears to predict BPH progression.In patients with a PSA of 1.4 ng/mL or higher,the annual rate of prostate growth was seen as high as 3.3 g,and was associated with an increased risk of AUR,worse LUTS,and decreases in Qmax[6,7].Observing the BPH progression rates in men who were treated in the placebo arm of the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms(MTOPS)trial,a number of baseline predictors for an increased risk ofBPH progression were identi fied-prostate volume≥30 g,PSA＞1.5 ng/mL,Qmax＜10 mL/s,post-void residual urine＞38 mL,and age≥62 years[8].

Over the last 20 years,the treatment of BPH has transitioned from surgery to medical management with the advent of selective alpha-adrenergic blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors(5-ARI)[9-11].While alpha-adrenergic blockers treat LUTS associated with BPH,5-ARI treat the obstructive component of the disease by reducing prostate volume.The purpose of this review is to examine the mechanism of action of 5-ARIs,their efficacy and safety,and their role in the management of BPH.

2.Mechanism of action of 5-ARIs

Normal prostate development as well as BPH progression occurs under the influence of dihydrotestosterone(DHT),which is a derivative of testosterone with a higher affinity for the androgen receptor[12].The conversion of testosterone to DHT occurs by the enzyme 5-alpha reductase;therefore,DHT production can be inhibited by 5-ARIs.Although both commercially available 5-ARIsare 4-azasteroidsthat behave as selective,irreversible inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase,dutasteride inhibits both isoenzymes of 5-alpha reductase(types 1 and 2),while finasteride only inhibits 5-alpha reductase type 2[13,14].Furthermore,studies have demonstrated that dutasteride is a 45 times more potent inhibitor of 5-alpha reductase type1 and a 2.5 times more potent inhibitor of5-alpha reductase type 2,when compared to finasteride[15,16].

3.Biologic ef ficacy of 5-ARIs

As discussed above,5-ARIs act to reduce the serum and intraprostatic DHT concentration,thereby causing involution of the prostatic epithelium and slowing the progression of BPH[17].The ef ficacy of both finasteride and dutasteride in reducing DHT has been demonstrated in a number of studies.In a direct comparison of dutasteride(0.5 mg/day)to finasteride(5 mg/day),the mean serum DHT levels after 24 weeks of treatment were found to be suppressed by 95%vs.71%,respectively[18].The effect of 5-ARIs becomes more pronounced within the prostatic tissue,as finasteride was found to reduce intraprostatic DHT levels by 80%(1 mg daily)and 91%(5 mg daily)over the course of 8 weeks compared to placebo[19].In a separate study,dutasteride(0.5 mg daily)was found to reduce intraprostatic DHT levels by 94%over the course of 12 weeks compared to placebo[20].

While the direct effects of 5-ARI lead to a dramatic reduction in serum DHT levels,other laboratory values are also affected by 5-ARI use.Serum testosterone elevations are known to occur with both finasteride and dutasteride use,but values will typically remain within the normal laboratory range[18].Additionally,given the intended effect of 5-ARI causing the involution of prostatic epithelial tissue,which is the main source of intraprostatic as well as serum PSA,the inhibition of DHT by 5-ARI indirectly results in a decrease in PSA.For example,the use of finasteride for 12 months duration has been found to lower serum PSA by approximately 50%[21].

4.Clinical efficacy of 5-ARIs

4.1.Monotherapy

A number of studies have examined finasteride and dutasteride use as monotherapy for BPH.In one of the longer studies of finasteride therapy,36 months of treatment was found to reduce prostate volume by 27%compared to baseline,improve Qmaxby 2.3 mL/s,and improve IPSS by 3.6 points[22].In order to clarify which patients benefited most from finasteride treatment,a meta-analysis of the six early trials of finasteride-pooling 2601 men-was performed.Boyle et al.[23]found that men with larger baseline prostate volumes benefited most from finasteride use:IPSS improved by 1.8 vs.2.8 points in those with prostate volume＜20 g vs.＞60 g,and Qmaximproved 0.9 mL/s vs.1.8 mL/s,respectively.They concluded that finasteride was most effective in men with larger prostates(＞40 g).As a result,the Proscar Long-Term Ef ficacy and Safety Study(PLESS)-a multicenter,randomized,double-blind,placebo controlled trial-enrolled 3040 men with symptomatic LUTS(based on IPSS and Qmax)with a mean 55 g prostate volume among participants.Overa4-year study period, finaste ridered uced prostate volume by 18%versus an increase of 14%in the placebo group.Additionally,the finasteride group had improvements in IPSS(2.6vs.1.0points in the place boarm)and Qmax(1.9 mL/s vs.0.2 mL/s in the placebo arm).Most importantly,the finasteride group had a significantly reduced risk of AUR(57%)and BPH-related surgery(55%)as compared to the placebo group[24].

The clinical efficacy of dutasteride has been examined in multiple 2-year,double-blind,placebo controlled studies[25].Including 4325 men with prostate volumes＞30 g,dutasteride treatment significantly improved IPSS(4.5 points vs.2.3 points for placebo)and Qmax(2 mL/s vs.0.6 mL/s for placebo).Similar to PLESS,the dutasteride was associated with a significant risk reduction of AUR(57%)and BPH-related surgery(48%).A proportion of these men(n=1188)were enrolled in an open-label 2-year continuation phase of therapy(4-year total of dutasteride therapy),with a very low rate of AUR and BPH-related surgery(2.4%and 2.6%,respectively)[26].In comparison,the placebo group of PLESS had a 4-year cumulative risk of 7%for AUR and 10%for BPH-related surgery[24].

Although the primary outcome measure was related to prostate cancer rather than BPH,the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial(PCPT)provides insight into the clinical efficacy of finasteride.In a 7-year study of men with a clinically normal prostate examination who were randomized to finasteride or placebo,the PCPT confirmed that finasteride reduces the number of BPH diagnoses(5.2%vs.8.7%for placebo),reduces the risk of AUR(4.2%vs.6.3%for placebo),reduces the need for BPH-related surgery(1.0%vs.1.9%for placebo)[27].Similarly,the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events(REDUCE)trial demonstrated a significantly lower risk of AUR in men that were randomized to dutasteride during a 4 year period(1.6%vs.6.7%for placebo)[28].

4.2.Combination therapy

As alpha-adrenergic blockers(alpha blockers)and 5-ARI have different mechanisms of action in the treatment of BPH,the combination of these two types of medications are thought to be synergistic[29].Alpha blockers have been demonstrated to improve LUTS related to BPH and have a faster onset of symptom relief compared to 5-ARI;however,alpha blockers have not been shown to reduce the longterm risk of AUR or need for BPH-related surgery[30].In fact,the longer term reductions in risk of AUR and need for BPH-related surgery were unique to 5-ARIs in the MTOPS trial,which randomized over 3400 men to the alpha blocker doxazosin or finasteride or both for a mean follow-up of 4.5 years.More importantly,in the MTOPS study,the risk of overall clinical progression(de fined as IPSS increase of≥4 points,AUR,incontinence,renal in sufficiency,or recurrent urinary tract infections)was reduced by 66%with combination therapy as compared to 39%with doxazosin alone and 34%with finasteride alone[8].

Similarly,the Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin(CombAT)trial examined the effect of dutasteride and the alpha blocker tamsulosin in combination and alone on the risk of AUR or need for BPH-related surgery.With 4844 men randomized and 3195 followed through the study duration of 4 years,combination therapy was found to significantly reduce the risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery by 66%compared to tamsulosin alone and by 20%compared to dutasteride alone.Additionally,combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction in IPSS when compared to either medication alone(6.3 points vs.3.8 points for tamsulosin and 5.3 points for dutasteride)[31].

Not all trials have demonstrated superiority of combination therapy for BPH treatment.Neither the Veterans Affairs(VA)trial nor the Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy(PREDICT)study did not demonstrate a benefit for combination therapy over alpha blockers alone.The VA trial compared the alpha blocker terazosin and finasteride,as well as combination therapy,in a group of 1229 men with BPH.Lepor et al.[32]found no significant improvements for combination therapy over terazosin alone in IPSSorQmaxafter1year of treatment.Similarly,the PREDICT study compared the alpha blocker doxazosin and finasteride,as well as combination therapy,in a group of 1100 men with BPH.No significant improvements in IPSS or Qmaxwere seen with finasteride over placebo after 1 year of treatment;and the combination of finasteride and doxazosin did not significantly improve these parameters over doxazosin alone[33].The lack of benefit with combination therapy in both of these trials are attributed to the study design minimizing the effect of finasteride.By including men with smaller prostate volumes,examining the treatment effects are a relatively short duration of treatment,and excluding more clinically meaningful endpoints(e.g.risk of AUR or need for BPH-related surgery),the known bene fits of finasteride in BPH treatment were nulli fied.

5.Tolerability of 5-ARIs

Finasteride was demonstrated to be well tolerated in PLESS,with the number of withdrawals from treatment due to side effects similar in the finasteride and placebo groups(11.5% vs.10.9%).The side effects more frequently encountered in the finasteride group as compared to placebo were decreased libido,impotence,decreased ejaculate volume,ejaculation disorders,breast enlargement,breast tenderness,and general rash[24].Similar tolerability pro files were found in PCPT,with sexual side effects and gynecomastia more common with finasteride treatment compared to placebo[27].In the studies of dutasteride,the drug-related adverse event rate was similar between dutasteride and placebo(19%vs.14%).The same proportion of men withdrew from the dutasteride and placebo groups due to side effects(8.9%in both groups)[25].With dutasteride use for 4 years,the rate of newly reported sexual side effects generally decreased with time;however,gynecomastia had a relatively constant rate of incidence(1.3%in year 1 and 2,1.8%in year 3,and 0.7%in year 4)[26].In the MTOPS and CombAT trials,combination therapy with 5-ARIs and alpha blockers appear to be well tolerated with a similar side effect pro file to the individual mono therapies used in combination[8,31].

6.Clinical guidelines for 5-ARIs

Given the numerous studies demonstrating the clinical efficacy of 5-ARIs in the treatment of BPH,both the European Association of Urology(EAU)and the American Urologic Association(AUA)include 5-ARIs prominently in their guidelines for management of BPH.The EAU gives a grade A recommendation for the use of 5-ARIs for patients with moderate to severe LUTS and enlarged prostates(＞40 g)and a grade A recommendation for the use of 5-ARIs in combination with alpha blockers for men likely to develop disease progression(e.g.,larger prostate volume,reduced Qmax)[34].Similarly,the AUA guidelines for management of BPH discuss 5-ARIs as an option for combination therapy with alpha blockers in men with demonstrable prostatic enlargement,noting the prevention of BPH progression noted with 5-ARI use(e.g.,risk of AUR and need for BPH-related surgery).Additionally,the AUA guidelines specifically recommend against the use of 5-ARIs in men without prostatic enlargement[35].

Given the results of the PCPT and the REDUCE trial,clinicians must keep in mind the associations between 5-ARI use and prostate cancer.In the PCPT,patients randomized to finasteride had a roughly 25%lower incidence of prostate cancer as compared to placebo,but an increased proportion of prostate cancer diagnoses were high grade(37%vs.22%)[27].Similarly in the REDUCE trial,the prostate cancer incidence was 23%lower for men randomized to dutasteride,but the incidence of the highest grades of prostate cancer(e.g.,Gleason score 8-10)was greater than placebo(0.9%vs.0.6%,p=0.15)[28].Many subsequent studies have demonstrated that the higher rate of high grade prostate cancer found with 5-ARI treatment was a result of selective inhibition of low grade cancers and decreased prostate volume resulting in improved biopsy yield[36,37].However,the Food and Drug Administration has added a black box warning to 5-ARIs concerning the increased risk of developing high grade prostate cancer.

7.Conclusion

The natural history of BPH is that of a progressive disease that can lead to AUR or the need for BPH-related surgery in some men.The prevention of BPH progression as well as the LUTS related to BPH are important elements to successful BPH management.Among the available BPH medications,only 5-ARIs have been shown to decrease prostate volume,thus reducing the risk of AUR and BPH-related surgery as compared to placebo.For men with enlarged prostates,the use of 5-ARI alone or in combination with alpha blockers is a mainstay of BPH treatment,and is reinforced by both the EAU and AUA guidelines for management.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1]Girman CJ.Population-based studies of the epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Br J Urol 1998;82(Suppl.1):34-43.

[2]Guess HA,Arrighi HM,Metter EJ,Fozard JL.Cumulative prevalence of prostatism matches the autopsy prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Prostate 1990;17:241-6.

[3]Emberton M,Andriole GL,de la Rosette J,Djavan B,HoefnerK,Vela Navarrete R,et al.Benign prostatic hyperplasia:a progressive disease of aging men.Urology 2003;61:267-73.

[4]Anderson JB,Roehrborn CG,Schalken JA,Emberton M.The progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia:examining the evidence and determining the risk.Eur Urol 2001;39:390-9.

[5]Jacobsen SJ,Jacobson DJ,Girman CJ,Roberts RO,Rhodes T,Guess HA,et al.Natural history of prostatism:risk factors for acute urinary retention.J Urol 1997;158:481-7.

[6]Roehrborn CG,McConnell JD,Lieber M,Kaplan S,Geller J,Malek GH,et al.Serum prostate-specific antigen concentration is a powerful predictor of acute urinary retention and need for surgery in men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urology 1999;53:473-80.

[7]Roehrborn CG,McConnell J,Bonilla J,RosenblattS,Hudson PB,Malek GH,et al.Serum prostate specific antigen is a strong predictor of future prostate growth in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Urol 2000;163:13-20.

[8]Crawford ED,Wilson SS,McConnell JD,Slawin KM,Lieber MC,Smith JA,et al.Baseline factors as predictors of clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men treated with placebo.J Urol 2006;175:1422-7.

[9]Sarma AV,Jacobson DJ,McGree ME,Roberts RO,Lieber MM,Jacobsen SJ.A population based study of incidence and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia among residents of Olmsted County,Minnesota:1987-1997.J Urol 2005;173:2048-53.

[10]Vela-Navarrete R,Gonzalez-Enguita C,Garcia-Cardoso JV,Manzarbeitia F,Sarasa-Corral JL,Granizo JJ.The impact of medical therapy on surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia:a study comparing changes in a decade(1992-2002).BJU Int 2005;96:1045-8.

[11]Souverein PC,van Riemsdijk MM,de la Rosette JJMCH,Opdam PCE,Leufkens HGM.Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and occurrence of prostatic surgery and acute urinary retention:a population-based cohort study in The Netherlands.Eur Urol 2005;47:505-10.

[12]Deslypere JP,Young M,Wilson JD,McPhaul MJ.Testosterone and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone interact differently with the androgen receptor to enhance transcription of the MMTV-CAT reporter gene.Mol Cell Endocrinol 1992;88:15-22.

[13]Span PN,Voller MCW,Smals AGH,Sweep FGJ,Schalken JA,Feneley MR,et al.Selectivity of finasteride as an in vivo inhibitor of 5 alpha-reductase isozyme enzymatic activity in the human prostate.J Urol 1999;161:332-7.

[14]Bramson HN,Hermann D,Batchelor KW,Lee FW,James MK,Frye SV.Unique preclinical characteristics of GG745,a potent dual inhibitor of 5AR.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;282:1496-502.

[15]Frye SV,Bramson HN,Hermann DJ,Lee FW,Sinhababu AK,Tian G.Discovery and development of GG745,a potent inhibitor of both isozymes of 5 alpha-reductase.Pharm Biotechnol 1998;11:393-422.

[16]Evans HC,Goa KL.Dutasteride.Drugs Aging 2003;20:905-18.

[17]Marks LS,Partin AW,Dorey FJ,Gormley GJ,Epstein JI,Garris JB,et al.Long-term effects of finasteride of prostate tissue composition.Urology 1999;53:574-80.

[18]Clark RV,Hermann DJ,Cunningham GR,Wilson TH,Morrill BB,Hobbs S.Marked suppression of dihydrotestosterone in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia by dutasteride,a dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2179-84.

[19]Norman RW,Coakes KE,Wright AS,Rittmaster RS.Androgen metabolism in men receiving finasteride before prostatectomy.J Urol 1993;150(5 Pt 2):1736-9.

[20]Wurzel R,Ray P,Major-Walker K,Shannon J,Rittmaster R.The effect of dutasteride on intraprostatic dihydrotestosterone concentrations in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007;10:149-54.

[21]Guess HA,Gromley GJ,Stoner E,Oesterling JE.The effect of finasteride on prostate specific antigen:review of available data.J Urol 1996;155:3-9.

[22]Stoner E.Three-year safety and ef ficacy data on the use of finasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urology 1994;43:284-94.

[23]Boyle P,Gould AL,Roehrborn CG.Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride:meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Urology 1996;48:398-405.

[24]McConnell JD,Bruskewitz R,Walsh R,Andriole G,Lieber M,Holtgrewe HL,et al.The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Finasteride long-term ef ficacy and safety study group.N Engl J Med 1998;338:557-63.

[25]Roehrborn CG,Boyle P,Nickel JC,Hoefner K,Andriole G,ARIA3001 ARIA3002 and ARIA3003 Study Investigators.Ef ficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2(dutasteride)in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urology 2002;60:434-41.

[26]Debruyne F,Barkin J,van Erps P,Reis M,Tammela TLJ,Roehrborn C,et al.Ef ficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.Eur Urol 2004;46:488-95.

[27]Thompson IM,Goodman PJ,Tangen CM,Lucia MS,Miller GJ,Ford LG,et al.The in fluence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.N Engl J Med 2003;349:215-24.

[28]Andriole GL,Bostwick DG,Brawley OW,Gomella LG,Marberger M,Montorsi F,et al.Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer.N Engl J Med 2010;362:1192-202.

[29]Lepor H.Alpha blockers for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Rev Urol 2007;9:181-90.

[30]Roehrborn CG.Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily prevents overall clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia but not acute urinary retention:results of a 2-year placebo-controlled study.BJU Int 2006;97:734-41.

[31]Roehrborn CG,Siami P,Barkin J,Damiao R,Major-Walker K,Nandy I,et al.The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia:4-year results from the CombAT study.Eur Urol 2010;57:123-31.

[32]Lepor H,Williford WO,Barry MJ,Brawer MK,Dixon CM,Gormley G,et al.The ef ficacy of terazosin, finasteride,or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia.Veterans affairs cooperative studies benign prostatic hyperplasia study group.N Engl J Med 1996;335:533-9.

[33]Kirby RS,Roehrborn C,Boyle P,Bartsch G,Jardin A,Cary MM,et al.Ef ficacy and tolerability of doxazosin and finasteride,alone or in combination,in treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia:the Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy(PREDICT)trial.Urology 2003;61:119-26.

[34]Oelke M,Bachmann A,Descazeaud A,Emberton M,Gravas S,MichelMC,etal.EAU guidelinesonthe treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction.Eur Urol 2013;64:118-40.

[35]McVary KT,Roehrborn CG,Avins AL,Barry MJ,Bruskewitz RC,Donnell RF,et al.Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Urol 2011;185:1793-803.

[36]Redman MW,Tangen CM,Goodman PJ,Parnes H,Ford PG,Lucia MS,et al.Finasteride does not increase the risk of highgrade prostate cancer:a bias-adjusted modeling approach.Cancer Prev Res 2008;1:174-81.

[37]Lucia MS,Epstein JI,Goodman PJ,Darke AK,Reuter VE,Civantos F,et al.Finasteride and high-grade prostate cancer in the prostate cancer prevention trial.J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1375-83.