Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy in treating difficult biliary ductal stones: Two case reports

Edward Alabraba, Simon Travis, Ian Beckingham

Abstract

Key words: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography; Video cholangioscopy;Lithotripsy; Biliary calculi; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Case report; Bilio-enteric anastomotic strictures

INTRODUCTION

Per-oral endoscopic access to the biliary tree is difficult after surgical procedures which alter the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) anatomy. These procedures include Billroth II distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction gastric bypass, and, those involving bilio-enteric anastomotic strictures (BEAS) such as pancreaticoduodenectomy and hepaticojejunostomy. BEAS could be particularly problematic as they promote cholestasis and their sutures generate foreign body reaction, thus forming calculi that cause further biliary strictures[1-4].

Biliary tree calculi in these patients with altered upper GI anatomy can be managed by advanced endoscopic procedures such as balloon-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)[5], or, rendezvous ERCP facilitated by Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided or percutaneous biliary tree puncture[6]. Enteroscopes used for balloon-assisted ERCP have smaller working channels than those used for conventional ERCP and so may not permit use of adjuncts such as lithotripsy[5]. EUS-guided procedures are technically challenging and not widely available.

Another option is surgical bile duct exploration but patients presenting with cholangitis on a background of BEAS and calculi are usually poor surgical candidates due to their comorbidities. Re-operation can also be difficult due to adhesions from previous surgery. Surgical treatment options are thus limited by the potential for increased morbidity and mortality.

Current guidance recommends percutaneous radiological stone extraction for the small number of patients in whom endoscopic techniques are unsuccessful or impossible[7]. Biliary access is usually achieved by inserting a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) drainviawhich catheter interventions are performed under fluoroscopic guidance. In this context, a less commonly reported procedure is percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy (PTCSL)which uses PTC biliary access for duct clearance under video cholangioscopy guidance with lithotripsy as an adjunct for stone fragmentation[7]. PTCSL is more established in East Asia where primary choledocholithiasis and hepatolithiasis are more prevalent, and PTCSL is used in their management. There are very few reports of PTCSL from other parts of the world; mostly case reports[8-10]and one single-centre case series[11]. In this first report of PTCSL from a UK centre, we describe our first 2 cases of PTCSL in patients with symptomatic BEAS associated with ductal stones.

CASE PRESENTATION

Patient 1

Chief complaint: Patient 1 is a 70-year-old man who was admitted with acute cholangitis. He previously underwent curative total gastrectomy for gastrooesophageal cancer 3-years prior, with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy. He underwent open repair of an incarcerated hiatus hernia two years later at which time symptomatic choledocholithiasis was treated by surgical common bile duct (CBD) exploration and side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy. His other co-morbidities were atrial fibrillation for which he was anticoagulated with warfarin, previous myocardial infarction, and limited mobility due to Paget's disease affecting both of his hips. He was malnourished and significantly underweight as a result of his previous surgeries.

Diagnostic evaluation: Physical examination of Patient 1 revealed a tachycardia of 120 bpm, and pyrexia of 38.5 °C. Abdominal exam demonstrated multiple previous surgical scars but a soft and non-distended abdomen. Laboratory work-up showed raised circulating white blood cell count of 19.6 × 109/L and raised bilirubin of 204 μmol/L.

Computerised tomography (CT) scanning in Patient 1, after broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluid resuscitation, showed dilated left intrahepatic ducts Figure 1. USS-guided PTC (PTC) showed a large extrahepatic calculus and choledochoduodenostomy stricture Figure 2.

Patient 2

Chief complaint: Patient 2 is a 70-year-old female who was admitted as an emergency with acute cholangitis. She underwent curative subtotal-gastrectomy, en bloc right hemihepatectomy, and reconstruction by roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy 4-years prior for metastatic gastric GIST down-staged with Imatinib. She also previously had left breast cancer treated with curative wide local excision and axillary node clearance 1-year prior. Her regular medications were Imatinib and Letrozole.

Diagnostic evaluation: Physical examination of Patient 2 revealed tachycardia of 115 bpm, pyrexia of 38.7 °C, soft non-distended abdomen and previous abdominal surgical scars. Her circulating white blood cell count and bilirubin were raised at 17.8× 109/L and 163 μmol/L respectively.

Patient 2 received broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluid resuscitation,then CT scanning showed dilated left intrahepatic ducts Figure 3. USS-guided PTC in Patient 2 showed multiple calculi in the dilated left intrahepatic ducts Figure 4 and a hepaticojejunostomy stricture.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Patient 1

Patient 1 had a BEAS of his choledochoduodenostomy and biliary calculi causing symptomatic biliary obstruction.

Patient 2

Patient 2 had a symptomatic hepaticojejunostomy stricture and biliary calculi.

TREATMENT

Patient 1

Emergency biliary drainage was achieved with an 8Fr locking pigtail external biliary drain inserted into the left hepatic ducts at diagnostic PTC in Patient 1 Figure 2. When the patient was clinically improved, the drain was internalised 6 d later Figure 5 with the internal component crossing the choledochoduodenostomy stricture. Jaundice resolved and cytology from PTC brushings did not show malignancy. Patient 1 was unsuitable for ERCP due to surgically altered anatomy and was a poor surgical candidate, so he was treated by PTCSL (procedure described in section titled“Treatment： PTCSL procedure”).

Figure 1 Computerised tomography scan image in Patient 1 showing dilated segment 4, 2 and 3 ducts.

PTCSL procedure

PTC tracts were allowed to mature for 6-wk; then PTCSL procedure performed aseptically under general anaesthesia administering prophylactic Co-Amoxiclav targeting Enterococci and gram-negative bacilli. Normal blood clotting was also ensured and the PTCSL procedure performed as follows： (1) PTC drains were exchanged over stiff wires (Terumo, Tokyo) for 23 cm 8F vascular sheaths (Cordis Milpitas, California) that were cannulated through the BEAS to serve as PTCSL access; (2) The vascular sheaths were exchanged for stiff Amplatz (Boston Scientific,Washington, United States) and standard J tipped (Kimal, Droitwich, United Kingdom) wires over which the tracts were dilated for insertion of 20F vascular sheaths. The sheaths were attached to skin with heavy silk sutures and trimmed to leave 20 French conduits for access into the left hepatic duct; (3) BEAS were dilated with 10mm Mustang angioplasty balloons (Boston Scientific, Washington) and some stones pushed into the small bowel; (4) Under direct visualisation with a 16F Choledochoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), stones were basket-retrieved Figure 6. Impacted stones were first fragmented using a Wolf 2280 Riwolith electrohydraulic lithotriptor (Richard Wolf, Knittliger, Germany) with a 5F flexible probe Figures 7 and 8; (5) At the end of the PTCSL procedure, the 20F sheaths were exchanged for 14F Flexima locking pigtail drains (Boston Scientific, Washington) over stiff Amplatz wires. Additional side holes were cut in the intra-biliary segment of the pigtail drains to create internal-external drains; the distal loops locked in the small bowel; (6) Drain position was confirmed fluoroscopically before securing with skinsuture and RevolutionTM catheter securement device (Merit Medical, Utah, United States); and (7) PTC drains were clamped after 24 h free-drainage and check cholangiogram performed 1-2 wk later.

Patient 2

Emergency biliary drainage was achieved with an 8Fr internal-external biliary drain inserted into the left hepatic ducts at diagnostic PTC in Patient 2 Figure 9. Jaundice resolved and cytology from PTC brushings did not show malignancy. Surgically altered anatomy made ERCP unfeasible and she was high-risk for surgery, so had PTCSL (procedure described in section titled “Treament： PTCSL procedure”).

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Patient 1

Patient 1 made a good recovery with ward-based care following PTCSL. He had nasojejunal (NJ) feeding nutritional support. Check cholangiogram Figure 10 showed four small non-obstructing calculi in peripheral ducts of Segment 6 but good flow of contrast into the duodenum. The internal-external drain was removed, and the tract sealed with AviteneTMmicrofibrillar collagen haemostat (Bard, Rhode Island, United States), and he was discharged from hospital to continue NJ feeding at home. Patient 1 was clinically well and reported no further episodes of symptomatic biliary obstruction at 6-mo follow-up.

Patient 2

Figure 2 Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography via segment 3 duct in Patient 1 showing filling defect consistent with an obstructing extrahepatic calculus (white arrow) at origin of the left hepatic ducts and located just proximal to the choledochoduodenostomy anastomosis. An external biliary drain is inserted.

Patient 2’s check cholan giogram showed remnant stones in segment 2 but contrast flowing freely into jejunum Figure 11. She was discharged home with the PTC drain clamped. She was readmitted 4 wk later for flushing of PTC drain to remove remnant stones. Subsequent cholangiogram showed fewer intrahepatic biliary duct stones Figure 12. Her PTC drain was removed the day after, and the track sealed by AviteneTM. She was discharged home without complications and remained well with no further episodes of symptomatic biliary obstruction at 6-mo follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The attractiveness of this PTCSL is that it combines two techniques that are routinely used in most Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Centres, namely： PTC and endoscopic biliary cholangioscopy. This makes it more feasible to establish PTCSL as a treatment for difficult ductal calculi in most HPB Centres. Patients with acute cholangitis may require emergency biliary drainage which when not possible by ERCP, is done by PTC drain insertion. As in both of our cases, emergency biliary decompression in patients with surgically-altered UGI anatomy is usually be done by PTC which makes it pragmatic to subsequently adopt PTCSL for definitive biliary clearance. We uniquely describe the first report of PTCSL from a UK Centre.

Although percutaneous access for PTCSL is usually transhepatic, it is also possible to gain accessviaa small bowel access loop; a T-tube sinus tract; or transcholecystically. However, none of these alternative access routes were available in our cases. It is preferable to perform PTCSL under general anaesthesia as the procedure is painful due to its working sheath which traverses skin, intercostal muscles, and the liver capsule. The absence of enhanced sedation or general anaesthesia has been correlated with lack of therapeutic success in long and complex endoscopic procedures to manage difficult ductal calculi[12].

Complications occur in approximately 7% of patients treated with PTCSL, mainly biliary sepsis, haemobilia and bile duct injuries[13,14]. In order to reduce complication risk, PTC tracts must be allowed to mature and gradually dilated before use in PTCSL[3]. Tract maturation time vary depending on size of the final working sheath for PTCSL. Reported tract maturation times have been as short as ≤ 4 d for 8-10F access sheaths which are used for fluoroscopic mechanical lithotripsy without any video cholangioscopy[13,14]. Longer tract maturation times of up to 6 wk have been described for 16-18F working sheaths used for video cholangioscopy-guided interventions[15,16]. An average of 2 PTCSL treatments are required to clear CBD calculi[14,17]while 5 are needed for intrahepatic calculi[15,18]. Our case with mainly intrahepatic calculi required 2 treatment sessions with PTCSL while the case extrahepatic calculi required only 1 session. Comparative studies show clearance rates for calculi are better for extrahepatic than for intrahepatic stones[3,13].

Lithotripsy is a therapeutic adjunct that improves success rates in patients undergoing video cholangioscopy-guided clearance of biliary calculi[19]. The most commonly used modality is electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) which fragments stones by generating shock waves from rapid expansion of surrounding fluid in response to short pulses of high-voltage electric sparks. Laser lithotripsy fragments stones by producing strong shockwaves using infrared light energy generated by the applied laser. Laser lithotripsy is more expensive and although randomized studies are lacking, systematic review shows it is more successful than EHL in treating impacted biliary tract calculi[20].

Figure 3 Computerised tomography scan image in Patient 2 showing previous right hemihepatectomy and dilated left intrahepatic ducts.

The recurrence rate for intrahepatic calculi post-PTCSL varies from 21%-40% after 10-years follow-up[15,18,21], bile duct strictures being the main risk factor[18]. The recurrence rate for CBD calculi post-PTCSL is 45% after 7-years follow-up[17]. The only 3 deaths reported due to PTCSL have been caused by biliary sepsis[14,15].

CONCLUSION

Our experience is that PTCSL is feasible and safe for biliary clearance when neither ERCP nor surgical exploration are suitable. PTCSL attractively combines PTC and video cholangioscopy which are techniques that are readily available in most HPB Centres, thus making it a pragmatic option for bile duct clearance when endoscopy is not feasible, and surgery is high-risk. Our report is limited by lack of long-term follow-up data.

Figure 4 Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography shows dilated left intrahepatic in addition to peripheral segment 3 ducts containing multiple calculi.

Figure 5 The external percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drain was converted to an internal-external drain (black arrow) 6 d following the original percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. The obstructing stone (white arrow) is again seen in the same position as in Figure 2. The distal locking loop of the drain is left in the duodenum and thus permits entry of contrast into the small bowel.

Figure 6 Video cholangioscopy image showing a guide wire (on left side of image) in the bile duct and a mobile stone being basket-retrieved from bile duct using an introduced Dorma basket (on right side of image).

Figure 7 Video cholangioscopy image showing guide wire (on left side of image) in bile duct lumen alongside impacted stone cluster with lithotripsy probe introduced (on right side of image) for electrohydraulic stone fragmentation.

Figure 8 Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy for ductal calculi.

Figure 9 Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography image for Patient 2 demonstrating the internal-external biliary drain (arrowed) traversing the hepaticojejunostomy stricture so contrast is now seen in the jejunum.

Figure 10 Post-percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy cholangiogram in Patient 1 showing unobstructed bile ducts but few small calculi in Segment 6. Internalised percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drain is seen with distal locked end in the duodenum.

Figure 11 Post-percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and lithotripsy check cholangiogram after in Patient 2 showed stones in segment 2.

Figure 12 Cholangiogram performed after repeat procedure in Patient 2 to flush remnant stones showed smaller and fewer remnant intrahepatic biliary duct stones.