Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID-19: A case report

Yan-Fei He, Shi-Jie Lian, Yu-Chao Dong

Yan-Fei He, Shi-Jie Lian, Cadre Health Care Department, The Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

Yu-Chao Dong, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital,Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

Abstract

Key words: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Clinical characteristics; Diagnosis and treatment;Young adults; Case report

INTRODUCTION

Since December 2019, many cases of pneumonia infected-novel coronavirus have been found in Wuhan, Hubei Province[1]. With the spread of the epidemic, such cases have appeared in other areas of China and abroad. The novel coronavirus causing pneumonia was officially named “2019 novel coronavirus” (2019-nCoV) by the World Health Organization on January 12, 2020. The novel coronavirus pneumonia was named “COVID-19” by the World Health Organization on February 11, 2020.Meanwhile, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses named the new coronavirus “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”[2].Novel coronavirus pneumonia does not have a vaccine or effective antiviral. At present, after active treatment, an increasing number of patients have been successfully treated and discharged, with a mortality rate of about 3.2%[3]. In this paper, the clinical characteristics of a patient with COVID-19 who was successfully treated were analyzed, and the clinical experience was summarized to provide a reference for clinical colleagues.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 42-year-old male patient had a cough for 6 d without obvious cause, as well as fever and fatigue for 1 d.

History of present illness

On January 16, 2020, the patient developed a cough with a small amount of white phlegm, which was not easy to cough up. He had no chest pain, dyspnea, palpitation,chest tightness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, or other discomfort and was not treated. On January 22, he had a fever with a maximum temperature of 38.5°C, as well as pain, fatigue, and poor appetite. He was admitted to Wuhan Hankou hospital for treatment on the same day after self-treatment. On February 4, he was transferred to Huoshenshan Hospital for treatment.

Physical examination

The patient’s body temperature was 36.8°C, pulse was 85/min, breath was 20/min,and blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg on the day of admission. His mind and spirit were normal, and his superficial lymph nodes were not swollen. Breathing in both lungs sounded thick, but there were no obvious dry or wet rales. Cardiac auscultation revealed no abnormalities. The abdomen was flat and soft. He did not have lumps,tenderness, or rebound pain. Limb muscle strength was normal, and pathological signs were negative.

Epidemiological history

The patient was a medical worker in Wuhan, where he had lived for a long time, with a history of living in the epidemic area. He had contact with many fever patients before getting sick himself.

History of past illness

The patient had no history of hypertension, diabetes, or other systemic diseases.

Personal and family history

The patient did not smoke or have other risk factors. His wife and family members were healthy.

Laboratory examination, imaging examination, diagnosis, and treatment

On January 22, the patient’s blood routine examination showed that the leukocyte count was 4.3×109/L, lymphocyte count was 1.2×109/L, procalcitonin (PCT) was 0.11 ng/mL, hypersensitive c-reactive protein (hsCRP) was 3.39 mg/L, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 8.81 mm/h. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was 98% (air absorption). A chest computed tomography (CT) examination revealed a small amount of ground-glass exudation in both lungs (Figure 1A). A throat swab tested positive for the nucleic acid of 2019-nCoV.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

According to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (revised version 5th) issued by the General Office of National Health Commission, the patient was diagnosed as having COVID-19[4].

TREATMENT

On January 22, oseltamivir phosphate capsules were given orally twice daily for 6 d;40 mg methylprednisolone with 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution was given intravenously once daily; 0.4 g moxifloxacin with 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution was given intravenously once daily; 3 g cefoperazone with 100 mL of 0.9%sodium chloride solution was given intravenously once every 12 h.

On January 24, the body temperature fluctuated between 37 and 38 °C, and there was no significant change in other symptoms. Lopinavir and ritonavir tablets were given orally (3 tablets, twice daily, for 6 d). Chest distress and shortness of breath occurred on January 26. SpO2was 94% (oxygen intake flow was 3 L/min). Another chest CT showed that the exudation increased compared with that before (Figure 1B).Antibiotics were stopped, and other treatments were not adjusted.

On January 28, the highest body temperature was 38.4 °C, respiratory rate was 28/min, and SpO2was 93% (oxygen intake flow was 5 L/min). Blood lymphocyte count was 0.7 × 109/L, hsCRP was 19.4 mg/L, PCT was 0.087 ng/mL, and ESR was 44.2 mm/h. Human immunoglobulin (intravenous drip, 10 g once daily) was added to the treatment. On January 29, the body temperature was normal but dyspnea had not improved. Lopinavir and ritonavir tablets were stopped and changed to 0.2 g arbidol (two tablets), taken orally three times daily for 5 d.

On January 30, the patient’s progress was as follows: Body temperature was 40.7°C,respiratory rate was 35/min, SpO2was 83% (oxygen intake flow was 10 L/min),leukocyte was 11.2×109/L, lymphocyte count was 0.5×109/L, and PCT was 0.202 ng/mL. The dosage of methylprednisolone was increased to 40 mg with 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution intravenously, once every 12 h. Human immunoglobulin was added intravenously (20 g once daily); Zadaxin (thymosin alpha-1) was added by subcutaneous injection (1.6 mg, once daily). His temperature was normal, and shortness of breath improved slightly.

Figure 1 Chest computed tomography results of the coronavirus disease 2019 patient. A: Computed tomography (CT) results of the chest on January 22 showed a small amount of ground-glass exudation in both lungs (arrows); B: CT results of the chest on January 26 showed an increased amount of exudation in both lungs (arrows); C: CT results of the chest on January 31 showed a large amount of exudation in both lungs which were more prominent in the left lung; D: CT results of the chest on February 3 showed that bilateral lung exudation was absorbed and local fibrosis was identified.

On January 31, SpO2was 88% (oxygen intake flow was 10 L/min). Reexamination of the chest CT showed large exudative shadows in both lungs (Figure 1C).

On February 1, SpO2was 92% (oxygen intake flow was 10 L/min), and the respiratory rate was 28/min. On February 2, SpO2was 95% (oxygen intake flow was 5 L/min), and the respiratory rate was 25/min. The dosage of methylprednisolone was reduced to 40mg with 10mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution (intravenous, once daily). On February 3, SpO2was 94% (oxygen intake flow was of 3 L/min), the lymphocyte count was 0.3×109/L, and hsCRP was normal. Another chest CT showed that pulmonary inflammation had reduced (Figure 1D).

On February 4, the patient’s SpO2was 98% (oxygen intake flow was 3 L/min).Intravenous injection of methylprednisolone was reduced to 20 mg with 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, once daily. Another throat swab came up negative for the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test. On February 5, SpO2was 94% (air intake), and breathing difficulties had improved significantly; human immunoglobulin was reduced to 10g (intravenous drip, once daily). On February 6, SpO2was 98% (air inhalation), the heart rate was 115/min, and medication was stopped. The nucleic acid test was negative on February 9, and the patient was discharged on February 10.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The patient was successfully treated and discharged after 19 d in the hospital. At the 3-mo follow-up, the patient had recovered well.

DISCUSSION

According to the patient’s symptoms, signs, epidemiological history, and contact history, a positive 2019-nCoV virus nucleic acid test by a throat swab and chest CT, it was confirmed that the patient met the diagnosis of COVID-19. The results of Nan-Shan Zhong’s team study showed that 43.8% of the patients had fever symptoms in the early stage, and 87.9% of them had fever after admission[5]. The laboratory examination of COVID-19 showed that the total number of leukocytes in the peripheral blood was normal or decreased in the early stage of the disease; the lymphocyte count decreased; some patients had an increase in liver enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase, muscle enzyme and myoglobin; and some critical patients could see an increase of troponin. CRP and ESR increased in most patients, and PCT was normal. In severe cases, D-dimer increased, and peripheral blood lymphocyte decreased progressively. The 2019-nCoV nucleic acid can be detected in nasopharyngeal swabs, sputum, lower respiratory tract secretions, blood, feces, and other specimens[6]. In the early stage of the disease, the total number of white blood cells in this patient was normal, lymphocyte count decreased, hsCRP increased, and PCT was normal. The pharyngeal swab was positive for 2019-nCoV virus nucleic acid.All of these met the typical characteristics of COVID-19 laboratory examination. In the early stage, the patient’s chest CT had single or double lung multiple ground-glass shadows. The lesions were mainly distributed around the lung and under the pleura.The image of the uninjured lung was normal. During the recovery period, the pulmonary lesions were absorbed, and fibrous foci formed. All of these were consistent with the imaging findings of COVID-19[7]. In the course of diagnosis and treatment, the patient gradually progressed to the severe stage[4], mainly shown by a progressive decrease of lymphocytes, a sudden rise of body temperature (40.7°C),shortness of breath (35/min), a decrease of oxygen saturation (SpO2of 83% with oxygen inhalation at 10 L/min flow), the rapid progress of chest CT manifestations,increased the number of lesions, significantly expanded the range, increased the density, and the distribution of lesions from peripheral to central.

Although no effective antiviral drugs and treatment methods have been confirmed,antiviral drugs should be used as early as possible and in the whole process. The patient was given oseltamivir orally on the day of admission, lopinavir and ritonavir tablets were given orally on the 3rdd of admission. Lopinavir and ritonavir tablets are a compound preparation of lopinavir and ritonavir. Lopinavir is an improved viral replicase inhibitor based on ritonavir. Ritonavir increases the half-life of lopinavir by inhibiting cytochrome, thus enhancing the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir[8]. Of the 99 novel coronavirus patients isolated from the Wuhan Jinyingtan Hospital, 75 received treatment with lopinavir and ritonavir tablets and other antiviral drugs such as oseltamivir and ganciclovir[9]. Although the efficacy of lopinavir and ritonavir tablets for the treatment manual of novel coronavirus is still lacking in pre-clinical data[10],currently the National Health Commission and the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine recommend lopinavir and ritonavir tabletsfor the treatment manual of the novel coronavirus[11].

Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce cytokine storm[12].During the outbreak of SARS in 2003, corticosteroids were widely used for the clinical treatment of SARS patients[13]. However, recent studies on SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome patients have shown that corticosteroid therapy will not reduce the death rate but will delay the elimination of the virus[14,15]. Corticosteroids also inhibit immune function and increase the risk of infection. Therefore, in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection patients, corticosteroids should be used with caution. Our experience is that corticosteroids should not be used for fever reduction in the early stage. In the middle and late stages, they should be used for a short time depending on whether there is immune overactivity, whether there is oxygen saturation in patients (whether there is hypoxemia), whether there is progress in chest CT (whether it develops to the advanced stage or the severe stage) and whether there is a continuous decrease of lymphocytes[6]. In this paper, the patient’s peripheral blood lymphocyte decreased progressively, and on January 30, the body temperature rose sharply (40.7°C), respiration was rapid (35/min), and oxygen saturation decreased(SpO2of 83% with oxygen inhalation at 10 L/min flow), which indicated that the patient’s condition was progressing to the critical stage, so on January 30, the dosage of methylprednisolone was increased to 40mg, once every 12 h, and the dosage was reduced on February 1 (3 d) after the symptoms were controlled.

For severe or critical COVID-19 patients, combined immune boosters are recommended based on general treatment. Intravenous injection of gamma globulin can rapidly increase the concentration of blood immunoglobulin G by three to six times, thus affecting the body’s passive immune function. Particularly when the corticosteroid dose is large, it should be used actively[16]. In this case, when the patient progressed to the critical stage on January 30, the dosage of human immunoglobulin(20g, intravenous drip, once per day) was increased on the same day, and the treatment was combined with subcutaneous injection of Zadaxin (thymosin alpha-1),which had the desired effect.

At present, there is no “gold standard” to judge the condition of COVID-19.Therefore, we should “observe the multiple indicators dynamically” in the evaluation of the disease. (1) Body temperature. The results showed that nearly half of the patients with COVID-19 had no fever in the early stage, and 87.9% had fever only after admission, so it is not enough to evaluate the progress of the disease only by temperature. However, for patients with fever symptoms, body temperature monitoring can help to judge changes of conditions, and it is one of the necessary indexes to release the patient from quarantine. (2) The number of lymphocytes. Novel coronavirus pneumonia patients during early laboratory examination had a decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count. Severe patients showed a progressive reduction. Lymphocytes reflect the immune function of the patients, so it can be used as an indicator to monitor disease development. (3) BloodSpO2. Blood SpO2is one of the reliable indexes that directly reflect pulmonary function. It is easy to operate in clinic and can be used to help judge the condition. And (4) Lung CT. The CT image of early lesions has certain characteristics, which can be used to evaluate the nature and scope of the lesions and is the preferred imaging examination method of COVID-19[17].The imaging manifestations of COVID-19 changed rapidly, so the chest examination can be performed once every 3 to 5 d if CT conditions permit. However, the imaging features of pneumonia are not specific, similar to many other viral infections, and not suitable for the examination of severe patients, which should be paid attention to in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 has certain clinical characteristics and typical imaging features. COVID-19 in young adults can be cured by active treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks to Dr. Bo-Ning Han for his careful polishing of the manuscript. We thank all the people who are fighting against the epidemic.