999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Administration of pre/probiotics with conventional drug treatment in Alzheimer's disease

2020-09-21 08:26:14JakubHort,MartinValis,FrancescoAngelucci
中國神經再生研究(英文版) 2020年3期

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with long preclinical phase, typically followed by a slow decline in memory,thinking and reasoning abilities. The underlying pathological processes are not yet fully elucidated, although two main disease hallmarks have been associated with AD pathology: amyloid beta species and neurofibrillary tangles. The plaques are deposits of a protein fragment called beta-amyloid (Aβ), which accumulates in the spaces between neurons. Tangles are twisted fibers of the tau protein, which accumulates inside the cells.

AD is not curable, although some treatments to reduce symptoms are available. Currently, there are five AD drugs approved by the U.S.Food and Drug Administration that treat the symptoms of AD —temporarily helping memory and thinking problems. Four are cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, rivastigmine, galantamine and donepezil)and the other (memantine) is an N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA)receptor antagonist. However, these medications can only temporarily improve memory, quality of life of patients and decrease burden for caregivers.

Among the causes of the disease, the “inflammation hypothesis”of AD has emerged in the recent years and it is based on findings on cells of the immune response in central nervous system (CNS). It is known that microglia and astrocytes initiate the immune response in the brain after exposure to pathogens. However, when the activation of the immune system is permanent, a condition called neuroinflammation is established, causing damage to CNS neurons. In AD,a chronic neuroinflammatory state with release of proinflammatory cytokines has been observed, which appears to be correlated to the constant accumulation of Aβ within neurons. It is not clear whether the chronic neuroinflammation precedes the onset of the disease or is a consequence of Aβ accumulation. It has been hypothesized that the chronic neuroinflammation observed in AD is associated with an alteration of the balance of gut microbiota, a phenomenon known as dysbiosis, which can negatively affect neuronal activity (Jiang et al.,2017).

Gut microbiota are able to influence brain activity through either immune/humoral activity or the vagus nerve that connects intestinal neurons with those of the CNS. In this way, disturbance in gut microbiota can cause brain dysfunctions. The term Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis has been introduced to describe this interaction, but the association between gut microbiota and AD is also related to the role of inflammation in the development and course of AD.

Some theories have been developed to explain the role of gut microbiota in inducing a chronic neuroinflammation in AD. The most important are: (1) a direct microbial infection inducing a neuroinflammatory state in the brain of AD patients; (2) an age-related dysbiosis”, which hypothesizes that AD arises during the process of aging of the immune system; (3) an antimicrobial protection hypothesis,which suggests that the accumulation of Aβ in the brain represents an immune response to the accumulation of harmful bacteria; and (4)the hygiene hypothesis of AD, which indicates in an excessive sanitation in early life the cause of late impaired function of the immune system.

In a recent publication, we examined in detail the scientific evidence for the role of gut microbiota in AD and the possible effects of compounds that alter its composition, such as pre- and probiotics and antibiotics (Angelucci et al., 2019).

The interactions among different factors in AD, such as individual's genetics, physical activity, lifestyle (including diet) and the use of medications, is very complex. The role of pre- and probiotics seems to be beneficial in restoring the balance of gut microbiota. Antibiotics can actually have a double action, positive or negative, depending on their specific microbiome target. Antibiotics that eradicate potentially harmful bacteria like Helicobacter pylori can have beneficial effects on the disease, while antibiotics that destroy so-called good bacteria can accelerate AD related pathology. In this scenario, we hypothesized that the use of agents that act on gut microbiota can have synergistic effect on AD treatments. However, because the role of gut microbiota in the disease has not been clearly identified, the use of pre or probiotics as AD therapy is still far from a practical application.

Nonetheless, interesting considerations can be made. First, we can try to understand if the current available treatments act positively or negatively on the composition of the gut microbiota. In this regard,the data present in the literature are very scarce but provide some interesting information. It has been shown that some pesticides with an inhibitory action on acetylcholinesterase resembling those of AD medications can affect the gut microbiota composition in laboratory animals, such as rodents (Liang et al., 2019) and zebrafish (Wang et al., 2019). Negative effects on gut microbiota were also found in rats treated with high doses of Tacrine (Yip et al., 2018).

From these data two conclusions can be drawn: (1) AD drugs that have negative effects on gut microbiota could lead to a worsening of the disease in the long term, although temporarily alleviating the symptoms; (2) it is possible that an adjuvant treatment with pre/probiotics can prevent and/or cure gut dysbiosis and, therefore, allow the therapeutic effects of AD drugs to be exploited more completely. In theory, if gut dysbiosis contributes to sustain the course of the disease and the current AD drugs may induce it, it is possible to hypothesize an explanation for the lack of permanent beneficial effects on disease progression and for the clinical observation that some patients are non-responders.

The concept of making the neurotransmitter acetylcholine available, or limiting the neuronal excitability with NMDA receptor antagonist, certainly has an important scientific rationale and it is supported by robust preclinical and clinical evidence. However, it must be considered that, if these beneficial effects are counteracted by a gut dysbiosis contributing to the progression of the disease, the curative potential of these treatments can be reduced.

Furthermore, the role of dysbiosis in AD drug development has been rather underestimated in the past. In in vitro pharmacological studies performed to characterize these and new therapeutic compounds, neuronal cell lines are normally used in absence of other cellular elements potentially influenced by gut microbiota, such as glial cells, cells of the immune response, and immune and endocrine molecules, such as cytokines and hormones. In in vivo studies using animal models of the disease, the role of gut microbiota in altering the activity of brain neurons is certainly less evident than in humans where cognitive brain functions are far more complex.

Much emphasis has been given to the failure of clinical trials with new compounds capable of reducing the accumulation of Aβ and tau proteins through various mechanisms. Among the possible side effects not properly investigated, an alteration of the intestinal flora composition cannot be excluded, especially for drugs taken orally.Not surprisingly, the search for new compounds is also shifting towards anti-inflammatory drugs that stimulate immune processes.These drugs could protect brain neurons from toxic proteins, including those produced by gut microbiota, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines and other innate immune activators.

It would therefore be interesting to study the effects of both novel and currently available drugs in association with treatments designed to restore and/or protect the composition of the gut microbiota. In this regard, some studies suggest that treatments based on substances regulating gut microbiota, i.e., tuna oil or algae oil, can lead to improved learning and cognition in mice exposed to aging-inducing agents (Zhang et al., 2018). Furthermore, these effects are comparable to those obtained with donezepil (Zhang et al., 2018).

Supporting this notion, it has been shown that healthy dietary patterns characterized by high intake of probiotics and prebiotics,in association to other nutrients, delay neurocognitive decline and reduce the risk of AD (Pistollato et al., 2018). In addition, it has been demonstrated that a diet rich in probiotics not only affect normal brain activity but also induces significant cognitive improvements in AD patients (Akbari et al., 2016). Also, in transgenic AD mice treated with pre and probiotics, increased cognitive performance and reduced number of Aβ plaques in the hippocampus have been observed(Abraham et al., 2019).

Figure 1 Putative synergistic action of pre/probiotics and AD drugs.

These data suggest that restoration of gut microbiota with pre and probiotics could be beneficial in AD and may affect the efficacy of the current medications, as we hypothesize in Figure 1. These adjuvant treatments could also interfere with the direct action of AD drugs on neurotransmitters, or target crucial molecules such as Aβ and tau proteins. It has been shown that the expression of hippocampal NMDA receptors (target of memantine) is dependent on the presence of gut microbiota, because it is significantly decreased in germ-free mice (Neufeld et al., 2011) and in rats treated with antibiotics (Wang et al., 2015). In addition, it has been recently demonstrated that pre/probiotics can reduce Aβ and tau proteins (targets of many AD drugs)and ameliorate cognition in rodent AD models. It was shown that rats injected with Aβ1-42and treated with probiotic substances display better memory and learning performance, reduced expression of intracellular Aβ and tau and oxidative stress biomarkers (Athari Nik Azm et al., 2018). In humans, avoidance to antibiotics, rich microbiota supplementation or variability in diet, like that of people who experience other eating habits while traveling, may be seen as beneficial.

In conclusion, the most recent data suggest that the association of pre/probiotic treatment with conventional drug treatments in Alzheimer is a field of investigation that may deserve some attention, given the repeated failures of new AD drugs in the clinic. It could be investigated whether the simultaneous administration of pre/probiotics and currently available medications (either separately or in one tablet)produces synergistic beneficial effects.

This work was supported by the Project No. LQ1605 from the National Program of Sustainability II (MEYS CR), the European Regional Development Fund-Project ENOCH (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868), the Institutional Support of Excellence 2. LF UK (699012) and by the Grant Agency of Charles University (Project no. 176317); partially supported by the grants from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (PROGRES Q40) and from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (RVO-FN HK 00179906); supported by the project IT4Neuro(-degeneration), reg. nr. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/18_069/0010054.

Jakub Hort, Martin Valis, Francesco Angelucci*Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, 2ndFaculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital,Prague, Czech Republic (Hort J, Angelucci F)International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (Hort J)Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hradec Králové,Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (Valis M)

*Correspondence to:Francesco Angelucci, PhD,francesco.angelucci@lfmotol.cuni.cz.

orcid:0000-0002-5956-5925 (Francesco Angelucci)

Received:July 3, 2019

Accepted:August 22, 2019

doi:10.4103/1673-5374.266057

Copyright license agreement:The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.

Open access statement:This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美日韩一区二区视频在线| 久久99国产综合精品1| 2021精品国产自在现线看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区高清无码久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉影院| 亚洲成人精品久久| 久草中文网| 欧美在线伊人| 欧美精品v欧洲精品| 97视频精品全国在线观看| h网站在线播放| 免费无码AV片在线观看中文| 欧美在线黄| 天天色综网| 性欧美在线| 国产乱子伦视频在线播放| 欧美中文字幕无线码视频| 欧美精品H在线播放| 国产91蝌蚪窝| 欧美成在线视频| 国产日本欧美亚洲精品视| 日韩精品中文字幕一区三区| 国产美女91呻吟求| 国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产毛片高清一级国语| 欧美黄色网站在线看| 国产不卡在线看| 亚洲精品自拍区在线观看| 国产91视频观看| 999国内精品久久免费视频| 超碰精品无码一区二区| 强乱中文字幕在线播放不卡| 激情爆乳一区二区| av尤物免费在线观看| 人人爽人人爽人人片| 欧美一级大片在线观看| 这里只有精品在线播放| 欧美一区二区人人喊爽| 国产青榴视频| 国产凹凸一区在线观看视频| 亚洲国产成人无码AV在线影院L| av色爱 天堂网| аv天堂最新中文在线| 57pao国产成视频免费播放| 国产中文在线亚洲精品官网| 国产精品视频免费网站| 国产精品女主播| 亚洲第一页在线观看| 少妇精品在线| 亚洲成a人片在线观看88| 2021亚洲精品不卡a| 美女扒开下面流白浆在线试听| 国产精品视频第一专区| 免费国产无遮挡又黄又爽| 国产精品免费电影| 天天色天天操综合网| 亚洲丝袜第一页| 亚洲a级在线观看| 六月婷婷综合| 国产理论一区| 成人午夜亚洲影视在线观看| www.国产福利| 亚洲成a∧人片在线观看无码| 国产成人精品男人的天堂| 国产日韩欧美视频| 国产粉嫩粉嫩的18在线播放91| 色天天综合久久久久综合片| 精品一区国产精品| 婷婷99视频精品全部在线观看| 亚洲男人的天堂久久香蕉| 99久视频| 国产老女人精品免费视频| 日韩毛片免费观看| 亚洲swag精品自拍一区| 国产一国产一有一级毛片视频| 久久久久久久久18禁秘| 久久狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠97视色 | 岛国精品一区免费视频在线观看| 精品人妻系列无码专区久久| 亚欧成人无码AV在线播放| 欧美中文字幕第一页线路一| 日韩欧美中文字幕一本|