999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in patients with severe COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

2021-06-04 02:37:06BinXiongLiMinHeYuanYuanQinHuDuZhuZhanYiHongZhouYaoKaiChenAnZhang
World Journal of Clinical Cases 2021年15期

Bin Xiong,Li-Min He,Yuan-Yuan Qin,Hu Du,Zhu Zhan,Yi-Hong Zhou,Yao-Kai Chen,An Zhang

Bin Xiong,Hu Du,Zhu Zhan,An Zhang,Department of Critical Care Medicine,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400010,China

Li-Min He,Department of Cardiology,The First Branch of The First Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400015,China

Yuan-Yuan Qin,Yi-Hong Zhou,Yao-Kai Chen,Division of Infectious Diseases,Chongqing Public Health Medical Center,Chongqing 400036,China

Abstract BACKGROUND The effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroid use in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains inconclusive.AIM To investigate the effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in patients with severe COVID-19.METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the difference in several outcomes between patients with severe COVID-19 who received corticosteroid therapy (the corticosteroid group) and patients with severe COVID-19 who did not receive corticosteroid therapy (the non-corticosteroid group).RESULTS Seventy-five patients were included in this study. Of these,47 patients were in the corticosteroid group and 28 patients were in the non-corticosteroid group. There were no differences between the two groups in the total length of hospital stay,the length of intensive care unit stay,high-flow oxygen days,non-invasive ventilator days,invasive ventilation days,and mortality rate. Total lesion volume ratio,consolidation volume ratio and ground-glass opacity volume ratio in the corticosteroid group decreased significantly on day 14,while those in the noncorticosteroid group did not show a significant decrease.CONCLUSION Our results show that adjunctive corticosteroid use did not significantly improve clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients,but might promote the absorption of pulmonary lesions. Larger multicenter randomized controlled studies may be needed to confirm this.

Key Words: COVID-19; Corticosteroid; SARS-CoV-2; Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a serious global public health challenge. COVID-19 is caused by the novel coronavirus,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),which is an enveloped RNA virus and is mainly transmitted through the respiratory tract,causing damage to the human respiratory system,systemic inflammatory reactions,and multiple organ failure in certain cases[1,2]. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak,two similar coronavirus outbreaks had already occurred in Asia,including the outbreak of SARS-CoV in 2003[3] and the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus in 2012[4,5].

According to existing literature,the symptoms of patients with COVID-19 are nonspecific,and include fever,cough and myalgia,accompanied by diarrhea,with or without the subsequent development of dyspnea. Severe cases involve acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS),sepsis,and septic shock[6-10]. While symptomatic supportive treatment may be administered,there is currently no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Different organizations,authoritative institutions,and scholars have successively released a variety of COVID-19 diagnosis or treatment plans or opinions,but drug treatment recommendations have been inconsistent.Corticosteroids have an inhibitory effect on inflammatory factors,and are often used as an adjuvant treatment for viral pneumonia. Studies have shown that the use of corticosteroids can help suppress excessive inflammatory reactions; nevertheless,the use of corticosteroids may delay the elimination of the virus and may result in serious adverse effects[11]. To date,the effectiveness of systemic corticosteroid use in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroid administration in patients with severe COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics,consent and permissions

The Ethics Commission of the Chongqing Public Health Medical Center approved this study (No. 2020-025-KY). Written informed consent was waived due to the rapid emergence of this infectious disease.

Study design and patients

The present study is a retrospective cohort study,which included all severe COVID-19 patients admitted to Chongqing Public Health Medical Center and Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital from January to March,2020.

The diagnosis of severe COVID-19 in subjects had to meet the following criteria: (1)Identification of COVID-19viareal-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and/or next-generation sequencing; and (2) Having at least one of the following conditions: (a) Respiratory distress (≥ 30 times/min); (b) Oxygen saturation≤ 93% at rest; (c) Oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 300 mmHg; (d) Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; (e) Septic shock development; and (f) Critical organ failure requiring intensive care unit (ICU) care. Shock was defined according to the World Health Organization guidelines for COVID-19[12]. Acute kidney injury was identified on the basis of serum creatinine[13]. Cardiac injury was diagnosed if the serum concentration of hypersensitive cardiac troponin I was above the upper limit of the reference range (> 28 pg/mL),measured in the laboratory of the designated hospital.

All patients received similar conventional COVID-19 treatment according to the Chinese Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment (Trial Version 5)[14]. We stratified the included patients into two groups according to whether they received corticosteroids (methylprednisoloneviaintravenous injection at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/d for 3-5 d) in their treatment regimens or not,namely,the corticosteroid group and the non-corticosteroid group.

Data collection

We reviewed clinical electronic medical records,nursing records,laboratory findings,and radiological examinations for all patients with the diagnosis of severe COVID-19.The admission data of these patients from day 0 (D 0),which was defined as the day of severe COVID-19 diagnosis to discharge or death were collected. Data were evaluated and collated,using case record forms. We collected data on gender,age,smoking,vital signs (heart rate,respiratory rate,mean arterial pressure),chronic medical history(hypertension,diabetes,coronary heart disease (CAD),chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),cerebrovascular disease,viral hepatitis,neoplastic disease,chronic kidney disease (CKD),symptoms from onset to hospital admission (fever,cough,sputum,dyspnea,weakness,headache,diarrhea),treatment (oxygen therapy,antibiotic agents,antifungal agents,immunoglobulin,thymopentin (or thymalfasin),and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO),acute physiology and chronic health assessment (APACHE) II score,as well as total length of hospital stay (LOS),and length of ICU stay.

Routine blood test results were also collected,including blood gas analysis,complete blood count,and serum biochemical tests,including electrolytes,lactate dehydrogenase,liver and kidney function,coagulation function,cardiac enzymes,interleukin-6 (IL-6),cluster of differentiation (CD)-4-positive T-cell count,CD-8-positive T-cell count,C-reactive protein (CRP),D-dimer,and procalcitonin (PCT).Chest radiographs or computed tomography (CT) scans were also performed for all hospitalized patients,and the frequency of examinations was determined by the attending physician.

Outcome assessment

We assessed the changes in APACHE II score and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2),the changes in lymphocyte count,CD4+ T-cell count,CD8+ T-cell count,pulmonary lesion volume,LOS,and length of ICU stay,proportions of patients using mechanical ventilation,and mortality rate.

The measurement of the extent of pneumonia was performed with the FACT Medical Imaging System (Dexin Medical Imaging Technology Co.,Ltd.),in which Pulmonary Infection Assisted Diagnosis (V1.7.0.1) automatically segmented the entire lung and lesions depicted on CT images using the “break and repair” shape analysis strategy,and then calculated the volumes of the entire lung and all lesions. Based on the initial automatic segmentation,the boundaries of each lesion were further precisely adjusted by manual tools to avoid the influence of non-inflammatory lesions such as large blood vessels,pleural effusion,pleural thickening,and calcification. In addition,according to the definitions of ground-glass opacity (GGO) and consolidation in the Fleischner Society Recommendations[15,16],we further measured the volume occupied by GGOs and consolidation components in the lesions. After completing all adjustments,the system automatically calculated the volumes of the lesions,GGOs,consolidation,and that of the whole lung. Finally,the volume ratio was calculated by the following formulas: total lesion volume ratio = (volume of all lesions)/(volume of whole lung) × 100%; GGO volume ratio = (volume of GGOs)/(volume of whole lung) × 100%; and consolidation volume ratio = (volume of consolidation)/(volume of whole lung) × 100%.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed with IBM SPSS software version 26 (IBM-SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,United States). The corticosteroid group and the non-corticosteroid group were initially analyzed by descriptive statistical methods. We performed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to evaluate the normality of the data distributions. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± SD,and independent samples were analyzed by thet-test.Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test or the Fisher's exact test. Differences were statistically significant atP< 0.05.

RESULTS

Demographics and baseline characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.Seventy-five patients with severe COVID-19 were included in this study. The mean age was 58.92 ± 14.29 years,and 39 (52%) patients were male. Of the 75 patients,47(62.7%) received corticosteroids and were therefore classified into the corticosteroid group,whereas 28 (37.3%) did not receive corticosteroids and were therefore classified into the non-corticosteroid group. All 47 patients in the corticosteroid group received corticosteroids within 72 h of severe COVID-19 diagnosis. The symptoms of COVID-19 in the included patients were fever (61.33%),cough (76%),dyspnea (53.33%),sputum production (34.67%),and weakness (29.33%). There were no statistically calculated differences between the two groups of patients in terms of gender,age,smoking,APACHE II score,hypertension,diabetes,CAD,COPD,cerebrovascular disease,viral hepatitis,neoplastic disease,CKD,fever,cough,sputum,weakness,headache,diarrhea,shock,leukopenia,thrombocytopenia,liver dysfunction,acute kidney injury,or cardiac injury,as displayed in Table 1.

Treatments and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19

Approximately 83% of patients (62/75) received antibiotic therapy,and 12 (16%)patients received antifungal therapy. Sixty-three patients (84%) received thymopentin or thymalfasin,and 30 patients (42.76%) received intravenous (IV) injection of immunoglobulin. Twenty-eight patients (37.33%) received non-invasive ventilation(NIV),7 patients (9.33%) received invasive ventilation,and three patients (4%)received ECMO therapy.

In the corticosteroid group,the vast majority of enrolled patients (95.74%) received antibiotics,and 25.53% of patients received antifungal therapy; the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics and antifungals was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group compared to the non-corticosteroid group (P< 0.05). Nevertheless,we found no differences between the two groups in terms of total LOS,length of ICU stay,high-flow oxygen days,NIV days,invasive ventilator days,and mortality rate,as indicated in Table 2.

Comparison of laboratory variables

There were no significant differences in APACHE II scores between the corticosteroid group and the non-corticosteroid group on D 0 or D 14. Moreover,the APACHE II score significantly decreased in each of the two groups from D 0 to D14 (P< 0.05),as shown in Table 3.

We did not observe a significant difference in the oxygenation index between the corticosteroid group and the non-corticosteroid group on D 0 or D 14. In addition,the oxygenation index in each of the two groups significantly increased from D 0 to D 14 (P< 0.05).

At the same time,we found that inflammatory indicators at baseline [e.g.,CRP,PCT,white blood cell (WBC),D-dimer,IL-6,and IL-10] and some serum biochemical indicators were not significantly different between the two groups on D 0 or D 14.

Some inflammatory factors in the corticosteroid group,including D-dimer and IL-10,increased over time,while CRP decreased significantly from D 0 to D 14 (P< 0.05).In addition,some inflammatory factors in the non-corticosteroid group,including PCT,CRP,and IL-10,decreased significantly from D 0 to D 14 (P< 0.05).

Table 1 Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients with severe coronavirus disease-19

Subsequently,compared with the non-corticosteroid group,we found that CD4+,but not CD8+ T-cell counts were significantly decreased in both groups from D 0 to D 14 (P< 0.05). These findings are illustrated in detail in Table 3.

Results of imaging evaluation in patients with COVID-19

Table 4 shows the results of imaging evaluations in each group of patients with severe COVID-19. We found that common chest CT features of COVID-19 patients mainly included consolidation,GGOs,and linear opacities. The total lesion volume ratio,consolidation volume ratio,and GGO volume ratio were significantly higher in the corticosteroid group than in the non-corticosteroid group on D 0 (P< 0.05). However,there was no significant difference in these indicators between the two groups on D 14(P> 0.05). These findings are illustrated in Figure 1.

Table 2 Treatments and outcomes in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19

We found that total lesion volume ratio and GGO volume ratio in both groups decreased over time,while total lesion volume ratio and GGO volume ratio in the corticosteroid group decreased significantly on D 14,which was different to that in the non-corticosteroid group. However,unlike patients in the corticosteroid group,whose consolidation volume ratio decreased significantly on D 14,we found that the consolidation volume ratio in the non-corticosteroid group increased significantly on D 14.

DISCUSSION

In this study,we found that the levels of inflammatory indicators (e.g.,CRP,PCT,WBC,D-dimer,IL-6,and IL-10) were increased in patients with COVID-19,lymphocyte,CD4+,and CD8+ T-cell counts were decreased in patients with COVID-19,and common chest CT features in COVID-19 patients were consolidation and GGOs,compared with the normal reference value. The lymphocyte,CD4+,and CD8+T-cell counts were significantly reduced in the adjunctive corticosteroid group compared with those in the conventional corticosteroid group,but there were no significant differences in the APACHE II scores,oxygenation indices (PaO2/FiO2),and LOS between these groups. The proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group than in the noncorticosteroid group. Among the other parameters,only the duration of NIV was significantly different between the groups. In addition,4 patients died in the corticosteroid group and no patients died in the non-corticosteroid group.

It is well known that in the treatment of viral pneumonia,the intermediate-acting corticosteroid methylprednisolone sodium succinate is commonly used due to its rapid onset,short biological half-life,good safety profile,and weak inhibition of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; in addition,it is the only steroidal drug available for shock therapy[11]. In the treatment of COVID-19 patients,clinicians use corticosteroids mainly because of its anti-inflammatory effects[17]. Corticosteroids can act on various stages and suppress multiple links of the immune response. In the early stages of inflammation,corticosteroids can reduce capillary dilation,inflammatory cell exudation,leukocyte infiltration,and phagocytosis. In later phases of the inflammatory response,corticosteroids can inhibit the excessive proliferation of capillaries and fibroblasts[18]. Corticosteroids can act on corticosteroid receptors,inhibit nucleartranscription factor nuclear factor-kappa B signaling,and further inhibit the transcription and translation of inflammatory factors. They may also play a role by inhibiting IL-2 gene transcription and then inhibiting T-cell clonal proliferation.Furthermore,corticosteroids can inhibit the induction of the immune response and affect the expression of interferon-γ,tumor necrosis factor-α,IL-1 and other cytokines[19].

Table 3 Comparison of laboratory variables at different follow-up points in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19

Pathological reports of patients who died from COVID-19 indicate that the lungs displayed alveolar injury with fibro-mucosal exudation,alveolar epithelial detachment,and pulmonary hyaline membrane formation,consistent with ARDS;inflammatory infiltration of mononuclear cells,mainly lymphocytes,in the interstitium was seen in the lungs,and the overall pathological changes were similar to those observed in patients who died from SARS and MERS[20]. Pathological findings of patients with SARS showed significant increases in T and B lymphocyte apoptosis,and mononuclear and macrophage numbers in immune organs. Similarly,in patients who died of COVID-19,there was a decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes,but lymphocytes were also over-activated,while the numbers of highlypro-inflammatory CCR4+,CCR6+,and Th17 cells increased. The above results suggest that there is a severe reduction in anti-inflammatory immune cells,and an increase in immune response-related damage in the lungs[20]. Similarly,the results of previous studies showed that 44.4% (12/27) of patients with mild COVID-19 and 84.6% (11/13)of patients with severe COVID-19 had lymphopenia. The absolute count of peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with severe COVID-19 was significantly lower than that in patients with mild COVID-19; the counts of CD3+,CD4+,and CD8+ T-cell subsets were lower in patients with severe COVID-19 than in patients with mild COVID-19[21]. Recent studies have shown that the numbers of total T-cells,CD4+ T-cells,and CD8+ T-cells were significantly reduced in COVID-19 patients[22],which is consistent with our findings. We also found that compared with patients in the conventional corticosteroid group,COVID-19 patients treated with adjunctive methylprednisolone had significantly lower absolute counts of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. This is similar to

previous reports by Ghoneimet al[23],who found that the early use of corticosteroids(dexamethasone) to treat flu in rats significantly reduced the counts of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells on day 7. A possible reason for this is that the use of corticosteroids may cause systemic immunosuppression[24,25],which has a cytotoxic effect on CD4+ Tcells[26] and is not conducive to viral elimination,resulting in delayed virus clearance and accelerated disease progression.

Table 4 Results of imaging evaluation in patients with coronavirus disease-19

Figure 1 Computed tomography manifestations of lung tissue in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019. A and B: Corticosteroid group;C and D: Non-corticosteroid group.

In the early course of corticosteroid treatment of viral pneumonia,studies have shown that the adverse effects of glucocorticoid use are significantly greater than the anti-inflammatory effects. In patients with SARS infections,long-term high-dose corticosteroids were used,and there were serious adverse reactions such as invasive fungal infections and femoral head necrosis[27]. Brun-Buissonet al[28] studied the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of ARDS caused by influenza A (H1N1) virus and found that the incidence of acquired pneumonia and death was higher in patients with the early use of corticosteroids than in those who did not receive corticosteroid therapy. In addition,the duration of mechanical ventilation in severely ill patients using corticosteroids was significantly prolonged[28]. In reports of adverse reactions in patients with SARS treated with corticosteroids,the adverse reactions were often positively correlated with the dose and timing of administration of corticosteroids[29].Earlier use of corticosteroids to treat mild SARS and MERS patients was found to increase SARS viral load in patients,and to delay the clearance of MERS virus RNA[30,31]. A meta-analysis published in 2019 that included ten observational studies on influenza found that the mortality rate,LOS in the ICU,and incidence of secondary bacterial or fungal infections were increased in patients receiving corticosteroids[32].However,it is worth noting that a series of clinical trials have shown that when lowdose or physiological-dose corticosteroids are used to treat patients with septic shock caused by lung infection,the use of corticosteroids can significantly reduce the mortality of such patients,and can reverse shock,shorten the ICU LOS,and reduce the use of mechanical ventilation[33,34]. However,our study found that adjunctive corticosteroids did not significantly improve the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2ratio),shorten the LOS (including ICU stay),reduce mechanical ventilation usage time,or decrease mortality. At the same time,Wanget al[35] found that no positive effects on outcomes were observed after the use of methylprednisolone. However,recent studies have found that systemic corticosteroid treatment in the initial 3 to 5 d can enhance the ratio of blood oxygen saturation and arterial oxygen tension to the oxygen fraction in patients with severe COVID-19,and ventilation can further enhance these two indicators[36]. Unlike COVID-19 patients with ARDS,COVID-19 patients with shock or multiple organ injury derive no additional survival benefit from corticosteroid therapy. However,the use of corticosteroids can significantly inhibit the inflammatory cytokine storm that occurs in the ARDS stage in COVID-19 patients,giving patients valuable time to control the infection,and prevent secondary multiple organ damage and septic shock[36].

It is well known that corticosteroids do not directly inhibit viral replication. Their main role is to reduce inflammation and suppress the immune response. The antiinflammatory effect is mainly manifested in the reduction of alveolar exudation and capillary permeability. The use of corticosteroids can delay the progression of mild pneumonia to ARDS,which can alleviate the occurrence of pulmonary fibrosis[37].Studies have shown that when SARS patients have increased shadows on lung imaging and increased dyspnea,the early and appropriate use of corticosteroids can significantly improve the patients' clinical symptoms,reduce the degree of disease progression,and accelerate the absorption of lung lesions[38,39]. Our study found that the addition of methylprednisolone can significantly improve lung lesions in patients with severe COVID-19 on D 14. We found that clinicians prefer to use corticosteroids in patients with more extensive lung lesions. This may be related to the fact that pulmonary lesions were significantly worse in the corticosteroid group than in the non-corticosteroid group at baseline. These patients were critically ill,progressed rapidly,were difficult to treat,and required enhanced immunotherapy.

To a certain extent,our findings have several biases,which are inherent flaws of retrospective studies. In addition,due to the low numbers of patients with severe COVID-19 in Chongqing,a limited number of critically ill patients were included in this study. Studies utilizing a larger sample size are warranted.

CONCLUSION

In summary,we found that adjunctive corticosteroids do not significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19,but might promote the absorption of pulmonary lesions. Larger multicenter randomized controlled studies may be needed to confirm this.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),is currently a serious global public health challenge. Severe cases involve acute respiratory distress syndrome,sepsis,and septic shock. At present,there is no significant and effective drug for severe COVID-19 patients. Corticosteroids have been used in the treatment of virus pneumonia,such as SARS,Middle East respiratory syndrome,and influenza A,but their efficacy is still inconclusive.

Research motivation

In clinical practice,some severe COVID-19 patients will benefit from the application of corticosteroids,but there are also adverse reactions. Therefore,whether corticosteroids should be used in COVID-19 patients and how to use them are issues worthy of discussion.

Research objectives

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroid administration in patients with severe COVID-19.

Research methods

Seventy-five patients with severe COVID-19 were divided into the corticosteroid group (47,62.7%) and the non-corticosteroid group (28,37.3%). In the corticosteroid group,methylprednisolone was administered via intravenous injection at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day for 3-5 d. We assessed the changes in APACHE II score and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2),the changes in lymphocyte count,CD4+ T-cell count,CD8+ T-cell count,pulmonary lesion volume,LOS,and length of ICU stay,proportions of patients using mechanical ventilation,and mortality rate. We measured the extent of pneumonia with the FACT Medical Imaging System,and calculated the volumes of the lesions,ground-glass opacity (GGO),consolidation,and that of the whole lung.Finally,the volume ratio was calculated by formulas.

Research results

Seventy-five patients were included in this study. Of these,47 patients were in the corticosteroid group and 28 patients were in the non-corticosteroid group. There were no differences between the two groups in the total length of hospital stay,the length of ICU stay,high-flow oxygen days,non-invasive ventilator days,invasive ventilation days,and mortality rate. Total lesion volume ratio,consolidation volume ratio and GGO volume ratio in the corticosteroid group decreased significantly on day 14,while those in the non-corticosteroid group did not show a significant decrease.

Research conclusions

Adjunctive corticosteroid use did not significantly improve clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients,but might promote the absorption of pulmonary lesions.

Research perspectives

Adjunctive corticosteroid treatment in severe COVID-19 patients should be comprehensively evaluated and used with caution.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the patients involved in the study.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人亚洲无码淙合青草| 欧美19综合中文字幕| 免费a级毛片视频| 免费 国产 无码久久久| 日本尹人综合香蕉在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合在线观看| 免费人成网站在线观看欧美| 国产成人三级| 成人免费黄色小视频| 欧美a在线看| 亚洲一区色| 69国产精品视频免费| 性喷潮久久久久久久久| 亚洲首页在线观看| 欧美成人免费一区在线播放| 人妻无码中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲无码一区在线观看| 1024你懂的国产精品| 亚洲人成高清| www中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲大尺码专区影院| 天天综合天天综合| 国产H片无码不卡在线视频| 国产精品分类视频分类一区| 午夜毛片免费看| 欧美一级专区免费大片| 亚洲黄网在线| 欧美亚洲第一页| 亚洲最大福利视频网| 1769国产精品免费视频| 国产成人乱码一区二区三区在线| 国产门事件在线| 一级爱做片免费观看久久| 激情爆乳一区二区| 永久免费无码成人网站| 欧美精品在线观看视频| 国产一级在线观看www色| 国产日产欧美精品| 色综合久久久久8天国| 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 无码一区18禁| 久无码久无码av无码| 亚洲码一区二区三区| 黄色免费在线网址| 亚洲第一成人在线| 亚洲视频黄| 亚瑟天堂久久一区二区影院| 熟妇丰满人妻av无码区| 亚洲三级视频在线观看| 永久成人无码激情视频免费| 色悠久久综合| 9999在线视频| 国产流白浆视频| 国产成人1024精品| 亚洲国产欧洲精品路线久久| 国产精品吹潮在线观看中文| 免费一级全黄少妇性色生活片| 日本一本在线视频| 日本91视频| 久久亚洲精少妇毛片午夜无码 | 亚洲天堂网在线视频| 亚洲无码免费黄色网址| 色婷婷亚洲综合五月| 久久99国产视频| 欧美不卡视频一区发布| 欧美一区二区三区国产精品| 国产成人91精品免费网址在线| 三区在线视频| a色毛片免费视频| 亚洲天堂成人在线观看| 一级香蕉人体视频| 亚洲三级片在线看| 国产69精品久久| 在线无码九区| 国产精品区视频中文字幕| 免费国产福利| a天堂视频| 亚洲一区二区在线无码 | 日本人妻一区二区三区不卡影院| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 亚洲中文字幕日产无码2021| 91无码人妻精品一区|