Brucellosis of unknown origin with haemophagocytic syndrome: A case report

Li-Hong Tian,Zhi-Gao Dong,Xu-Yan Chen,Lian-Jiang Huang,Ping-Ping Xiao

Li-Hong Tian,Zhi-Gao Dong,Xu-Yan Chen,Ping-Ping Xiao,Department of Hematology and Rheumatology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College,Xiamen 361021,Fujian Province,China

Lian-Jiang Huang,Department of Laboratory,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College,Xiamen 361021,Fujian Province,China

Abstract BACKGROUND Brucellosis is a contagious bacterial disease caused by Brucella species,which is a leading zoonotic disease worldwide. Most patients with brucellosis have a clear infection source; however,our case had a rare presentation of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis without any epidemiological history.CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a fever of unknown origin.After laboratory examinations,such as blood culture and bone marrow biopsy,the patient was diagnosed with brucellosis and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. After antibiotic therapy,the patient was afebrile,and his haemogram recovered to normal,after which he was discharged.CONCLUSION Brucellosis cannot be excluded in patients with clinically unexplained fever,even in those without epidemiologic history.

Key Words: Brucella; Brucellosis; Haemophagocytic syndrome; Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; Fever; Case report

INTRODUCTION

Brucellosis is a zoonotic infectious disease caused byBrucellaspecies[1]. Brucellosis has various clinical manifestations,the most common being fever,followed by weakness,hyperhidrosis,myalgias,and arthralgias[2,3]. Most patients come into contact with infected animals or ingest infected meat or unpasteurised milk. However,unknown origin brucellosis is relatively rare. Here,we report a case of brucellosis with secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis without epidemiologic history.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 50-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a history of fever.

History of present illness

The patient’s symptoms were fever and weakness for 6 d and diarrhoea for half a day.His body temperature reached 39.2 °C; he had no cough or other symptoms.

History of past illness

The patient had no remarkable medical history.

Personal and family history

The patient had unremarkable personal and family history.

Physical examination

There were no remarkable findings on physical examination except the patient’s temperature was 39.5 °C.

Laboratory examinations

Laboratory analyses were conducted for blood,blood culture,biochemical tests,coagulation,and levels of serum C-reactive protein,serum procalcitonin,and ferritin.Laboratory data showed pancytopenia with a white blood cell count of 2.67 × 109cells/L,haemoglobin levels of 14.7 g/dL,and a platelet count of 83 × 109cells/L(Table 1). The blood culture on the sixth day of incubation grewBrucella melitensis(Figure 1). The level of soluble CD25 was 3256 U/mL,and abdominal ultrasonography revealed no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly. High resolution computed tomography of the chest showed no abnormalities.

Imaging examinations

Bone marrow biopsy showed slight hypocellularity with an increase in macrophages exhibiting haemophagocytosis (Figure 2).Brucellawas detected by mass spectrometry(Figure 3).

Table 1 Laboratory results for a 50-year-old man with brucellosis and secondary haemophagocytic syndrome

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The final diagnosis of the presented case was brucellosis with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

TREATMENT

Treatment for the infection and conventional supportive therapy were administered after admission. After oral doxycycline (100 mg/dose,twice a day) and intravenous cefoperazone/sulbactam (3000 mg/dose,twice a day) for 4 d,the fever disappeared,and the body temperature was normal (Figure 4).

Figure 1 Brucella in blood culture. Gram staining,100 ×.

Figure 3 Mass spectrometry results.

Figure 4 Body temperature changes during treatment.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The laboratory data of day 10 showed recovery. The patient was subsequently discharged from our hospital.

DISCUSSION

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by bacteria of theBrucellaspecies[4,5].Diagnostic criteria include the epidemiologic history,clinical manifestations,andBrucelladetection[6]. In this case,we identifiedBrucellaby blood culture and mass spectrometry. This was a case of brucellosis with secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. After treatment with anti-brucelladrugs,the haemogram became normal.

Generally,brucellosis develops after exposure to infected animals or contaminated products such as milk[7-9]. It should be noted that this patient lacked any history of exposure to these predefined epidemiologic factors. Interestingly,more and more unexplained infected cases have occurred. Recently,two cases of infective endocarditis in injection drug users without zoonotic exposure have been reported[10]. Zangeet al[11] reported a patient with brucellosis who had no travel history,no exposure to unpasteurised dairy products,no animal contact,and no insect bites. The patient’s ingested meat samples also showed negative results in polymerase chain reaction testing and microbiological cultures forBrucellaspecies. Hence,from these reports,it is recommended to pay attention to unexplained infected individuals in whom an accurate diagnosis may have been missed. The patient in this present case denied any exposure to animals or contaminated products. Before the detection ofBrucella,the absence of epidemiologic factors contributed to misdiagnosis,especially before the results of aetiological examination. Thus,in all unexplained,infectious febrile patients admitted to hospitals,it is necessary to use broad-spectrum antibiotics. Moreover,it is also warranted to consider rare pathogenic bacteria,such asBrucella.

Other concerns in this case report were the indicators of inflammation.Brucellais a gram-negative bacterium,and the detection of C-reactive protein,procalcitonin,and ferritin contribute to the severity of the inflammation. However,we noticed that Creactive protein and ferritin levels showed a typical rising at the time of onset,although procalcitonin levels were below normal during hospitalisation. Obviously,procalcitonin levels did not correlate with the severity of illness. Incidentally,changes in procalcitonin levels may not be reflective of the severity of brucellosis.

CONCLUSION

Brucellosis cannot be excluded in patients with clinically unexplained fever,even in those without epidemiologic history. Before obtaining the aetiology test results,the administered antibiotics should cover rare pathogens,such asBrucella,which could prevent the timely exacerbation of the disease.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank our patient who agreed to the publication of this case report and provided information.