999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Mills’ syndrome is a unique entity of upper motor neuron disease with N-shaped progression: Three case reports

2022-12-19 08:06:58ZhiYunZhangZhiYuanOuyangGuoHuaZhaoJiaJiaFang
World Journal of Clinical Cases 2022年19期

Zhi-Yun Zhang, Zhi-Yuan Ouyang, Guo-Hua Zhao,Jia-Jia Fang

Abstract

Key Words: Mills’ syndrome; Motor neuron disease; Primary lateral sclerosis; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; N-shaped progression; Case report

lNTRODUCTlON

In 1900, Mills[1] described 8 cases of progressive hemiplegia that began in the extremity of the lower limb and ascended to the ipsilateral upper extremity without significant sensory impairment. Mills claimed that this disorder was a new form of degenerative disease characterized by a gradually progressive, unilateral ascending clinical syndrome of upper motor neuron-predominant hemiparesis. His description was based on clinical examination only, and different disorders such as multiple sclerosis, syphilis, parkinsonism, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were not excluded. Analysis of the post-mortem findings of a patient from one of his original case series who had been symptomatic for 8 years showed unilateral degeneration of the crossed and uncrossed pyramidal tracts at the level of the spinal cord and brainstem but no Betz cell degeneration in the motor cortex and no attrition of anterior horn cells[2]. The advances in the diagnostic laboratory, electromyography (EMG), and neuroimaging tests confirmed the picture of progressive unilateral ascending weakness associated with pyramidal tract impairment of Mills’ syndrome.

In the recent 2 decades, only about 50 additional cases have been reported in the literature[3,4] and mostly as single case reports. Owing to the lack of pathological examination, most of the cases did not allow reliable differential diagnosis; A patient progressed to frontotemporal dementia[5] and developed an extrapyramidal syndrome[6]. Although the syndrome currently has an uncertain nosological status, some authors consider it as a lateralized variant of primary lateral sclerosis (PLS)[4,7], while others refer to it purely as a clinical term including different disorders[8,9]. The progression of the disease and the natural course of the reported cases suggest a different pathophysiologic basis for neuronal death. Here, we report 3 cases that have similar features as those described in Mills’ original paper to shed light on the clinical characteristics of Mills’ syndrome.

CASE PRESENTATlON

Chief complaints

Case 1:A 68-year-old woman was admitted to our outpatient clinic with chief complaints of stiffness in her left lower extremity for about 3 years.

Case 2:A 72-year-old woman presented with a half year history of slow progressive right-sided hemiparesis.

Case 3:A 55-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with complaints of weakness in his left lower extremity for 7 mo.

History of present illness

Case 1:The symptoms developed slowly and remained unnoticed to the patient until 1 year ago when she felt weakness in her left leg that affected her walking. She did not notice any muscle twitching. Furthermore, altered cognitive function, language and swallowing problems, sensory disturbance, and sphincter dysfunction were noted.

Case 2:The onset was described as “heaviness” in her right leg when running and progressively difficult walking with tripping and stumbling. She experienced weakness that ascended to her right upper limb 2 mo before presentation. She also noticed that her handwriting worsened, and she was unable to raise her right arm above her head. She denied any abnormal sensation or altered perception, any language problem, bulbar symptom, or bowel or bladder incontinence. Madopar was prescribed because the diagnosis of the outpatient doctor was Parkinson’s disease.Case 3:Evaluations included multiple brain, spine, and lower limb magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominal computed tomography, cerebrospinal fluid examination, EMG, and visual, auditory, and somatosensory evoked potentials; all tests showed negative results. The patient was discharged without treatment but continued to be followed up. Sixteen months after he noticed weakness in his left lower extremity, he experienced weakness in his left arm. The paresis became increasingly evident, and the symptoms progressed from difficulty in walking to dependence on a wheeled walker.

History of past illness

Case 1:Her personal and social history were unremarkable.Case 2:Her personal and social history were unremarkable.

Case 3:His personal history was unremarkable, except for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Personal and family history

Family history of genetic disease was negative in the 3 cases.

Physical examination

Case 1:Physical examination revealed left hemiparesis with spastic hypertonia and hyperreflexia, particularly in the left lower limb. Muscle power in the left lower limb was graded 3/5 based on the Medical Research Council scale. Babinski sign was negative. Superficial and proprioceptive sensations were normal, and cranial nerve functions were unimpaired.

Case 2:Neurological examination revealed mild weakness in the right-sided limbs (Medical Research Council grade 4) with hypermyotonia; tendon reflexes were pathologically brisk in all limbs, particularly on the right side. Right foot clonus was noted, and right Babinski’s and Hoffmann’s signs were positive. Sensory examination including pain sensation, position sensation, and vibration sensation was unremarkable. Cranial nerve functions were unimpaired, and coordination and vision were normal.

Case 3:Neurological examination revealed left-side hemiparesis with hyperreflexia, hypertonia, and ankle clonus. Muscle power was graded 4/5 in the left upper limb and 1/5 in the left lower limb. Babinski’s and Hoffmann’s signs were negative, and amyotrophy was not detected. The right limbs, cranial nerves, superficial and proprioceptive sensation, and cerebellar functions were normal.

Laboratory examinations

Case 1:The results of routine laboratory tests including blood routine examination, biochemical and immunoserologic indices, tumor markers, thyroid function test, vitamin B12level, serological tests for syphilis and HIV, and cerebrospinal fluid examination were negative.

Case 2:Blood tests for paraneoplastic autoantibodies, serum B12, copper, HIV, and syphilis showed negative results. Nerve conduction study was normal, and somatosensory evoked potentials were unremarkable.

Case 3:Routine blood, creatine kinase, autoantibodies, and HIV and syphilis screening were normal. Cerebrospinal fluid test with isoimmune electrofocusing was negative.

Imaging examinations

Case 1:Brain MRI showed isolated atrophy of the right occipital lobe. No remarkable findings were observed with the cervical and thoracic vertebrae on either MRI or EMG.

Case 2:No decrement was noted in repetitive nerve stimulation. Brain MRI showed mild periventricular ischemic changes, but cervical spine MRI was normal. Positron-emission tomography scan was essentially normal.

Case 3:Brain MRI was normal, and cervical spinal MRI showed mild noncompressive degeneration of the C5/6 and C6/7 disks. EMG was performed again; the results showed minor chronic denervation in the left dorsal interosseous, left sternocleidomastoid muscle, and thoracic paraspinal muscles. No evidence of lower motor neuron involvement or polyneuropathic impairment was found. We performed MR diffusion tensor imaging to study the brain white matter connections, but the findings were normal.

FlNAL DlAGNOSlS

The final diagnosis was motor neuron disorder (MND) in the 3 patients.

TREATMENT

Case 1:No special treatment of the patient.

Case 2:By consensus, baclofen and riluzole were prescribed upon discharge.

Case 3:The patient was discharged without treatment but continued to be followed up.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Case 1

The patient underwent 28 mo of follow-up, and she developed slow progressive spastic hemiplegia without sensory disturbance. The stiffness gradually spread to the left upper extremity and mildly affected her housework activities. She progressed to using a cane outside the home 4.5 years after the first symptom manifested. She felt slight stiffness in her right lower limb, but no bulbar symptoms were observed at the last follow-up visit.

Case 2

Over the subsequent months, the stiffness and weakness in her right limb gradually aggravated. She noted stiffness in her left leg 6 mo later, and she became wheelchair-bound. Sixteen months into her disease course, she noted her left hand became clumsy, and her daily living abilities were limited. Eighteen months into her course, she developed mild pseudobulbar symptoms and occasional choking when eating. She died from respiratory failure 32 mo after the initial onset of symptoms.

Case 3

The patient’s symptoms progressed sharply during the course of the follow-up. The right lower limb was affected within 19 mo of his disease onset, and the right upper limb was affected 24 mo after onset. After 28 mo of the first symptoms onset, the patient developed severe bulbar dysfunction including dysarthria and dysphagia. He died from respiratory failure 44 mo after the onset of symptoms. Throughout his course, he had no marked fasciculations or muscle atrophy.

DlSCUSSlON

The clinical picture presented by our 3 patients (details shown in Table 1) showed several primary distinctive features: (1) Onset at middle- and old-age; (2) Only upper motor neuron findings were evident throughout the course of their disease; (3) Could affect bilateral limbs in advanced stages but strictly began in one lower extremity and spread to the homolateral upper limb, followed by the contralateral lower limb, and finally the contralateral upper limb, which we refer to as N-shaped progression; and (4) Extremely asymmetric, and the lower extremity is much more severely affected than the upper limb, even in the late stages of the disease. Features supporting its classification fall within the spectrum of MND, and evolution to both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and PLS has been described[4]. We propose that Mills’ syndrome can be considered a unique entity of MND because there is some heterogeneity in the progression, including its N-shaped progressive manner. It should be emphasized that few published cases that did not have onset in the lower limb or did not show descending progressive hemiplegia[9,10] did not strictly meet the criteria of Mills’ syndrome.

In light of the present situation, these cases were differentially diagnosed from ALS. The clinical hallmarks of ALS are clear; there are definitive electrophysiological criteria called EI Escorial Criteria that requires evidence of both upper and lower MND. The symptoms usually spread and progress within a segment and from one segment to the other (cranial, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral)[11]. Obviously, our patients did not meet these diagnostic criteria for ALS, given the absence of lower motor neuron signs in the clinical and electrophysiological examination.

Some authors have illustrated the associated clinical and radiologic asymmetry and absence of lower motor neuron involvement, supporting a hemiparetic variant of PLS[12]. PLS is a progressive upper MND without the clinical signs of lower motor neuron involvement, wherein the patterns of progression most commonly spread from side to side and from region to region that commonly start symmetrically in the lower extremities and evolve to spastic tetraparesis, ultimately with bulbar involvement[13]. Zhaiet al[14] conducted a study to identify the subsets of PLS patients with common clinical, physiological, and anatomical features; they termed PLS as ascending, multifocal, or sporadic paraparesis owing to its pattern of symptom progression. Ascending progression was noted in patients with one limb onset and progression from one side to the other occurring first, followed by ascending progression[15]. Therefore, we speculate that the pattern of symptom progression is one of the key features to distinguish Mills’ syndrome from PLS.

Table 1 Patient clinical characteristics

Maragakiset al[7] reported 5 cases that have features consistent with the original clinical description by Mills. The researchers claimed that these cases should be classified as hemiparetic PLS rather than a distinct clinical entity. However, 2 patients described in this paper had onset in the upper extremity, without the tell-tale N-shaped progression pattern. The different sequences of clinical manifestations presumably reflect the different nosology with PLS. Moreover, through Pringle’s diagnostic criteria, PLS shows benign clinical prognosis, slow rate of progression, and average symptom duration ranging from 7.2-14.5 years[16]. Distinct from that, the duration from the onset of symptoms to death was < 4 years in patient 3, whereas the bulbar symptoms evolved rapidly in patient 2. The prognosis of our cases was not so benign (Table 2). A recent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography study[17] found significant hypometabolism in motor and premotor areas contralateral to the limb weakness in Mills’ syndrome patients, which is more limited than that of ALS and PLS patients. Taken together, Mills’ syndrome should be considered a unique nosological entity of the MND spectrum rather than a variant of PLS.

Another dominant view about Mills’ syndrome is that it is purely a clinical description that can have secondary etiologies. The cases reported in the literature related to Mills’ syndrome included different disorders such as multiple sclerosis, syphilis, and unilateral cerebral atrophy[8]. Mirianet al[3] described a 63-year-old woman diagnosed with Mills’ syndrome progressing to corticobasal syndrome. Turneret al[13] used 11C-(R)-PK11195 positron-emission tomography scanningin vivoto explore the cortical lesion in cases of upper MND. In this study, 2 patients had clinical features similar to Mills’ syndrome: A patient demonstrated a marked focal increase in the binding of (11)C-(R)-PK11195 in the superior frontal region contralateral to the affected limbs; and by contrast, the other patient showed no focal areas of increased binding in the cerebral cortex. The second patient however had a high cervical cord lesion and was presumed to have extra cerebral inflammatory disease. The authors summarized that Mills’ syndrome is a purely clinical description that should be reserved for patients with a progressive spastic hemiparesis for which no other explanation can be found. The lack of evidence of secondary etiology in our 3 patients enables us to propose that the degeneration may be idiopathic. However, given that neither pathological examination nor autopsy was conducted, we failed to conclude whether Mills’ syndrome is a clinical diagnosis that includes complex disorders.

In our first case, MRI of the brain showed atrophy of the right occipital lobe, while the spinal cord was normal. No other alternative etiologies seemed plausible after serological tests and cerebrospinal fluid screening. Previous imaging studies demonstrated that cerebral atrophy is widespread in ALS, involving the grey matter, white matter, and motor and extra-motor regions[18]. Recently, a study using deformation-based morphometry analysis showed significant bilateral atrophy in the motor cortex and corticospinal tract and ventricular enlargement, along with significant longitudinal atrophy in the precentral gyrus, frontal, and parietal white matter[19]. To our knowledge, no previous morphometric study of MND has mentioned occipital lobe atrophy, and we believe that this change is not related to this syndrome.

Table 2 Differential diagnosis of Mills’ syndrome from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis

Phosphorylated transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (pTDP-43) aggregates in the cytoplasm of motor neurons and neuroglia in the brain are one of the pathological hallmarks of ALS[20]. Correlation analysis showed that the severity of pTDP-43 pathology in the white matter was linearly associated to that in the overlying grey matter. In addition, the severity of pTDP-43 pathology and neuronal loss correlated closely with grey and white matter oligodendrocyte involvement.

Sainouchiet al[21] reported the clinicopathological features of 2 autopsy cases of hemiplegic-type ALS and discussed the possible pathomechanism. Their results revealed that in the upper motor neuron system there was heavier pTDP-43 accumulation in the motor areas controlling the clinically predominant limb. B?umeret al[22] reported a 72-year-old patient with co-occurrence of aphasia and progressive right hemiparesis. Postmortem examination revealed striking left hemisphere atrophy within the primary motor cortex, accompanied by neuronal loss, gliosis, and TDP-43-positive neuronal and glial cytoplasmic inclusions. However, with respect to axonal propagation, pTDP-43 oligomers would have primarily spread along the unilateral corticospinal tract[23]. The N-shaped progression pattern in Mills’ syndrome is considered an orderly and sequential process in the upper motor neuron system, and such contiguous lesion spread in Mills’ syndrome may further support the abovementioned TDP-43 propagation hypothesis. Additional studies are needed to further understand the commonalities and differences from other neurodegenerative diseases and elucidate its underlying physiopathology.

A proper diagnosis can hardly be provided at the early stage of disease for cases when weakness emerges unilaterally in one limb. In the second patient of our report, Parkinson’s disease was initially considered. Thus, understanding the N-shaped progression pattern of Mills’ syndrome is particularly important to improve the clinician’s ability to identify these patients early in their disease course and to provide patients with adequate counselling.

CONCLUSlON

Mills’ syndrome should be conceptualized as a unique nosological entity of upper MND spectrum, with typical onset in one lower extremity that eventually spreads with an N-shaped progression pattern. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for the diagnosis of Mills’ syndrome when the onset is restricted to one lower extremity paralysis without evidence of lower motor neuron involvement or sensory impairment. However, whether Mills’ syndrome is a clinical diagnosis that includes complex disorders remains unclear. Further studies should extensively look into this matter to gain a better understanding of the natural history and underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Zhang ZY and Ouyang ZY both wrote and revised the text; Zhao GH and Fang JJ revised the manuscript for intellectual content; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supported bythe Public Welfare Technology Research Program of Zhejiang Province, No. LGF20H090011; the Key Projects of Major Health Science and Technology Plan of Zhejiang Province, No. WKJ-ZJ-2129; and the Educational Reform Project of Medical College of Zhejiang University, No. jgyb20202033.

lnformed consent statement:Three patients exhibiting progressive spastic hemiparesis similar to Mills’ original description were identified from the Inpatient Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. All the procedures were approved by the ethics committees of The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Informed consents were obtained from all the patients.

Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors did not provide a conflict of interest statement.

CARE Checklist (2016) statement:The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:China

ORClD number:Zhi-Yun Zhang 0000-0003-4047-2849; Zhi-Yuan Ouyang 0000-0003-0204-857X; Guo-Hua Zhao 0000-0001-7943-209X; Jia-Jia Fang 0000-0002-8549-8009.

S-Editor:Gong ZM

L-Editor:Filipodia

P-Editor:Gong ZM

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人年鲁鲁在线观看视频| 国产国语一级毛片| 亚洲Aⅴ无码专区在线观看q| 四虎国产成人免费观看| a级毛片在线免费| 国产精品污污在线观看网站| 国产精品第页| 久久福利网| 色九九视频| 一级福利视频| 国产人妖视频一区在线观看| 欧美三级日韩三级| 日本国产精品| 国产日韩欧美中文| yy6080理论大片一级久久| 日本欧美成人免费| 国产性爱网站| 国产欧美另类| 在线国产你懂的| 91亚洲影院| 亚洲午夜天堂| 亚洲一级毛片在线观播放| 69视频国产| 三上悠亚在线精品二区| 精品久久久久久中文字幕女| 成AV人片一区二区三区久久| 91网在线| 黄色成年视频| 麻豆国产在线观看一区二区 | 97精品久久久大香线焦| 欧洲成人在线观看| 日韩精品一区二区三区大桥未久 | 国产美女91视频| 3D动漫精品啪啪一区二区下载| 国产成人免费视频精品一区二区| 国产日韩精品欧美一区灰| 青青草91视频| 国产欧美网站| 欧美日本中文| 成人福利在线观看| 波多野结衣一区二区三区四区| 51国产偷自视频区视频手机观看| 成人在线观看不卡| 综合网天天| 国产一区成人| 中文字幕在线观| 园内精品自拍视频在线播放| 精品国产aⅴ一区二区三区| 99热这里都是国产精品| 最新痴汉在线无码AV| 美女潮喷出白浆在线观看视频| 玖玖精品在线| 在线播放国产一区| 久久www视频| 成人日韩视频| 中文字幕日韩久久综合影院| 亚洲国产精品VA在线看黑人| 欧美日韩国产综合视频在线观看 | 国产丝袜一区二区三区视频免下载| 亚洲最大在线观看| 欧美一区中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码久久天堂| 国产不卡在线看| 亚洲国产天堂久久综合226114| 国产香蕉在线| 精品成人一区二区三区电影 | 伊人激情久久综合中文字幕| 久久特级毛片| 2021无码专区人妻系列日韩| 久久特级毛片| 国产成人高清精品免费| 国产精品男人的天堂| 黄色网站在线观看无码| 性喷潮久久久久久久久| 天天操精品| 黄色污网站在线观看| 亚洲第一成网站| 久久久无码人妻精品无码| 91精品综合| 久久国产精品波多野结衣| 欧美福利在线| 91小视频在线观看免费版高清|