999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

胰島素抵抗對急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死非糖尿病患者早期梗死范圍及心功能的影響

2015-03-21 03:27:16曹樹軍王峙峰首都醫科大學大興醫院心血管內科北京0600解放軍總醫院心血管內科北京00853
解放軍醫學院學報 2015年3期
關鍵詞:胰島素糖尿病

謝 剛,曹樹軍,王峙峰首都醫科大學大興醫院 心血管內科,北京 0600;解放軍總醫院 心血管內科,北京 00853

胰島素抵抗對急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死非糖尿病患者早期梗死范圍及心功能的影響

謝 剛1,曹樹軍1,王峙峰2
1首都醫科大學大興醫院 心血管內科,北京 102600;2解放軍總醫院 心血管內科,北京 100853

目的觀察胰島素抵抗對急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(non ST-segment elevation myocardial infartion,NSTEMI)的非糖尿病患者早期梗死范圍及心功能的影響。方法連續選取2014年1月6日- 7月31日解放軍總醫院心血管內科監護室收治的69例急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者,就診后10 min內完成18導聯ECG并計算ST段壓低幅度總和,入院次日行超聲心動圖測定左心室射血分數(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、左心室舒張末期容量(left ventricular end diastolic volume,LVEDV)及左心室收縮末期容量(left ventricular end systolic volume,LVESV),并測定空腹血糖及空腹血清胰島素水平,計算胰島素抵抗指數(HOMA-IR),分為胰島素抵抗(insulin resistance,IR)組(HOMA-IR≥1.7)、非胰島素抵抗(non insulin resistance,NIR)組(HOMA-IR<1.7),兩組患者均在入院48 h內定時留取靜脈血標本(每6 h 1次),測定相應肌酸激酶、肌酸激酶同工酶及N末端-腦利鈉肽前體水平。結果39例(57%)被納入IR組,剩余30例被納入NIR組,兩組的年齡、性別、吸煙史、高血壓史、高膽固醇血癥史、起病至就診時間、就診時Killip分級差異無統計學意義。IR組就診時ST段壓低幅度總和、CK峰值、CK-MB峰值及NT-proBNP峰值均明顯高于NIR組(P<0.01)。兩組LVEDV差異無統計學意義;與NIR組相比,IR組LVESV明顯增高(P<0.01),LVEF明顯降低(P<0.01)。結論在非糖尿病合并急性NSTEMI早期IR發生比例較高,合并IR者心肌梗死范圍明顯擴大,左心室收縮功能受損更為嚴重。

胰島素抵抗;心肌梗死;心功能

胰島素抵抗(insulin resistance,IR)是代謝綜合征(metabolic syndrome,MetS)的重要病理生理機制,也是心血管疾病的重要危險因素[1-2]。急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)人群中合并MetS比例較高,近期的1項大樣本臨床研究顯示,在心肌梗死急性期,該比例達到69%,且相對于未合并MetS的AMI人群,預后較差[3]。有研究顯示,IR是非糖尿病合并急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardial infartion,STEMI)住院死亡率增加的獨立預測因子[4-6],在非糖尿病合并STEMI患者中,即使接受有效急診PCI治療,IR仍明顯減少冠狀動脈血流儲備、增加心肌梗死范圍[7]。目前,罕有IR對非糖尿病合并急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(non ST-segment elevation myocardial infartion,NSTEMI)影響的臨床研究,本研究的目的在于初步探討IR是否會影響急性NSTEMI非糖尿病患者的早期心肌梗死范圍及心臟功能損害的程度。

對象和方法

1 研究對象 連續入選2014年1月6日- 7月31日解放軍總醫院心血管內科監護室收治的首發急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者69例。入選標準:1)符合2011年美國心臟病學會基金會和美國心臟協會(ACCF/AHA)發布的指南[8]關于“NSTEMI”的定義;2)在心梗起病后12 h內入院;3)入院48 h內病情穩定,早期行藥物保守治療者。排除標準:1)既往明確糖尿病史;2)既往雖無明確糖尿病史,但入院后查糖化血紅蛋白>6.5%;3)置入臨時/永久起搏器或ECG呈完全性束支傳導阻滯改變;4)既往合并慢性心功能不全、陳舊心肌梗死、嚴重心臟瓣膜病、甲狀腺疾病、風濕免疫系統疾病、惡性疾病。根據胰島素抵抗指數(HOMA-IR)計算結果將收集病例分為:胰島素抵抗(insulin resistance,IR)組(HOMA-IR≥1.7)、非胰島素抵抗(non insulin resistance,NIR)組(HOMAIR<1.7)。分別收集兩組患者基本臨床資料,包括年齡、性別、吸煙史、高血壓病史、高膽固醇血癥史、起病至就診時間、就診時Killip分級。

2 HOMA-IR計算方法及臨界值確定 入院次日測定空腹血糖及空腹血清胰島素水平,并計算HOMA-IR,計算公式:(空腹胰島素[μU/ml]×空腹血糖[mmol/L])/22.5。近期1項納入7 305例非糖尿病日本人群研究[9]顯示,將HOMA-IR≥1.7作為篩查代謝綜合征的臨界值,男性人群的敏感性和特異性分別為73.4%、70.5%,女性人群的敏感性和特異性分別為81.5%、77.0%,故在本研究中亦將HOMA-IR≥1.7作為判定存在胰島素抵抗的臨界值。

3 心肌缺血負荷及梗死范圍判定 就診后10 min內完成18導聯ECG,計算ST段壓低幅度總和(Sum STD)作為評估患者心肌缺血總負荷的指標;入院后48 h內每間隔6 h留取靜脈血標本,測定CK、CK-MB,取其峰值作為判定心肌梗死范圍的指標。

4 心臟功能評估 入院后48 h內每間隔6 h留取靜脈血標本,測定N末端-腦利鈉肽前體(NT-pro BNP),取其峰值作為判定心功能的生化指標;入院次日行超聲心動圖檢查測定左心室舒張末期容積(left ventricular end diastolic volume,LVEDV)、左心室收縮末期容積(left ventricular end systolic volume,LVESV)及左心室射血分數(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)。

5 統計學方法 應用SPSS11.0軟件進行統計分析,計量資料以±s表示,兩組間計量資料均值比較采用t檢驗,計數資料比較采用χ2檢驗,P<0.05為差異有統計學意義。

結 果

1 兩組基本臨床資料比較 納入69例患者,平均年齡(57.35±8.26)歲,其中男性51例(74%),女性18例(26%)。39例(57%) HOMA-IR≥1.7納入IR組,30例(43%) HOMA-IR<1.7納入NIR組,兩組在年齡、性別、吸煙史、高血壓史、高膽固醇血癥史、起病至就診時間、就診時Killip分級方面差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。見表1。

2 兩組空腹血糖、空腹血清胰島素及HOMA-IR比較 IR組空腹血糖、空腹血清胰島素水平和HOMA-IR均顯著高于NIR組(P<0.01)。見表2。

3 兩組心肌缺血負荷及心肌梗死相關指標比較IR組就診時,18導聯心電圖所示ST段壓低幅度總和顯著高于NIR組(P<0.01),反映IR組患者起病時心肌缺血負荷較重;IR組CK、CK-MB峰值均顯著高于NIR組(P<0.01),說明IR組患者心肌梗死范圍較大。見表3。

表1 兩組患者基本臨床資料對比Tab. 1 Comparison of basic clinical characteristics between two groups (n=69)

表2 兩組急性心?;颊呖崭寡?、空腹血清胰島素及HOMA-IR比較Tab. 2 Comparison of FBG, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR of NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

表2 兩組急性心梗患者空腹血糖、空腹血清胰島素及HOMA-IR比較Tab. 2 Comparison of FBG, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR of NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

FBG: fasting blood glucose

?

表3 兩組急性心?;颊逽T段壓低幅度總和及CK、CK-MB峰值對比Tab. 3 Comparison of Sum STD, CKpeakand CK-MBpeakof NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

表3 兩組急性心?;颊逽T段壓低幅度總和及CK、CK-MB峰值對比Tab. 3 Comparison of Sum STD, CKpeakand CK-MBpeakof NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

CKpeak: the peak level of CK; CK-MBpeak: the peak level of CK-MB

?

表4 兩組急性心?;颊逳T-pro BNP峰值及LVEDV、LVSDV、LVEF對比Tab. 4 Comparison of NT-pro BNPpeak, LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF of NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

表4 兩組急性心?;颊逳T-pro BNP峰值及LVEDV、LVSDV、LVEF對比Tab. 4 Comparison of NT-pro BNPpeak, LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF of NSTEMI patients between two groups (±s)

NT-pro BNPpeak: the peak level of NT-pro BNP

?

4 兩組心肌梗死急性期內心臟功能比較 入院后48 h內,IR組NT-proBNP峰值顯著高于NIR組,兩組LVEDV無統計學差異(P>0.05)。IR組LVESV顯著高于NIR組(P<0.01),LVEF顯著低于NIR組(P<0.01),提示IR組在發生NSTEMI后左心室收縮功能受損較為嚴重。見表4。

討 論

合并IR的危重癥患者通常臨床預后更差[10-11],在STEMI患者中,出現IR是應激條件下血糖代謝異常的一種表現[12],近期1項納入356例非糖尿病合并STEMI的研究中,通過計算穩態模型評估指數(homeostatic model assessment index,HOMA index)篩查IR,IR在STEMI急性期內發生率高達65.73%[13]。本研究中,研究對象為69例非糖尿病合并NSTEMI患者,同樣以計算HOMA指數作為篩查IR的指標,結果顯示,入院次日IR比例依然高達57%,NSTEMI與STEMI具有共同的發病機制及病理生理學機制,提示IR在AMI急性期發生率較高。

有研究顯示,在既往無糖尿病史的急性冠脈綜合征患者中,急性期合并IR者心肌梗死范圍更大,LVEF降低更為明顯[14]。本研究中,IR組患者CK及CK-MB峰值均明顯高于NIR組,提示相較于非糖尿病合并NSTEMI的患者,心肌梗死急性期合并IR者心肌梗死范圍更大。相較于空腹血糖的升高幅度(12%),IR組的空腹血清胰島素升高幅度更為明顯(72%)。在正常情況下,胰島素對冠狀動脈具有擴張作用,且呈劑量依賴性[15-16]。而在急性冠狀動脈綜合征患者中,胰島素水平升高及IR導致冠狀動脈前向血流及冠狀動脈微循環血流灌注減少[6,17]。在非糖尿病合并急性心肌梗死患者中,合并IR者冠狀動脈粥樣硬化程度更重[18]。有趣的是,本研究中,IR組患者就診時18導聯ECG示ST段壓低幅度總和明顯高于NIR組,對于NSTEMI患者,Sum STD的大小與冠狀動脈病變的受累范圍及嚴重程度呈正比[19]。推測在本研究中IR組患者冠脈病變受累范圍更廣、狹窄程度更重,繼而IR組患者發病時心肌缺血負荷更重。導致IR組患者心梗范圍擴大的可能機制包括:1)在NSTEMI急性期,胰島素水平升高、IR減少心外膜冠狀動脈及冠狀動脈微循環血流灌注;2)IR組患者冠狀動脈粥樣硬化程度更為嚴重。

心肌梗死范圍的大小與心肌梗死后心臟功能受損的嚴重程度呈正相關。本研究中入院次日超聲心動圖結果分析顯示,相較于NIR組,IR組患者左心室心腔并無明顯擴大,而LVESV明顯增加、LVEF明顯降低,提示在尚未發生左心室重構的同時,由于IR組患者心肌梗死范圍的擴大,導致其左心室收縮功能受損更明顯。這也與IR組患者NT-pro BNP峰值明顯高于NIR組的結果相吻合。

綜上,本研究顯示,在非糖尿病合并NSTEMI早期IR發生率較高,合并IR者冠狀動脈粥樣硬化程度可能更為嚴重,同時可能通過減少心外膜冠狀動脈及冠狀動脈微循環血灌注,使得心肌梗死范圍進一步擴大,其左心室收縮功能受損更為嚴重。

1 Robins SJ, Lyass A, Zachariah JP, et al. Insulin resistance and the relationship of a dyslipidemia to coronary heart disease: the Framingham Heart Study[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2011, 31(5): 1208-1214.

2 Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Insulin resistance as estimated by homeostasis model assessment predicts incident symptomatic cardiovascular disease in Caucasian subjects from the general population: the Bruneck study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2007, 30(2):318-324.

3 Arnold SV, Lipska KJ, Li Y, et al. The reliability and prognosis of in-hospital diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in the setting of acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(8): 704-708.

4 Lazzeri C, Valente S, Chiostri M, et al. Correlates of acute insulin resistance in the early phase of non-diabetic ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2011, 8(1): 35-42.

5 Lazzeri C, Sori A, Chiostri M, et al. Prognostic role of insulin resistance as assessed by homeostatic model assessment index in the acute phase of myocardial infarction in nondiabetic patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2009, 26(10): 856-862.

6 Sanjuan R, Blasco ML, Huerta R, et al. Insulin resistance and shortterm mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2014, 172(2): e269-e270.

7 Trifunovic D, Stankovic S, Sobic-Saranovic D, et al. Acute insulin resistance in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in nondiabetic patients is associated with incomplete myocardial reperfusion and impaired coronary microcirculatory function[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2014, 13: 73.

8 Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/Non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2011, 123(18): e426-e579.

9 Yamada C, Moriyama K, Takahashi E. Optimal cut-off point for homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance to discriminate metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic Japanese subjects[J]. J Diabetes Investig, 2012, 3(4): 384-387.

10 Pretty CG, Le Compte AJ, Chase JG, et al. Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2012, 2(1): 17.

11 Li L, Messina JL. Acute insulin resistance following injury[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2009, 20(9): 429-435.

12 Nishio K, Shigemitsu M, Kusuyama T, et al. Insulin resistance in nondiabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2006, 7(2): 54-60.

13 Lazzeri C, Valente S, Chiostri M, et al. The glucose dysmetabolism in the acute phase of non-diabetic ST-elevation myocardial infarction:from insulin resistance to hyperglycemia[J]. Acta Diabetol, 2013,50(3): 293-300.

14 Lazzeri C, Valente S, Chiostri M, et al. Acute insulin resistance assessed by the homeostatic model assessment in acute coronary syndromes without previously known diabetes[J]. Angiology,2013, 65(6): 519-524.

15 Sundell J, Nuutila P, Laine H, et al. Dose-dependent vasodilating effects of insulin on adenosine-stimulated myocardial blood flow[J]. Diabetes, 2002, 51(4): 1125-1130.

16 Laine H, Nuutila P, Luotolahti M, et al. Insulin-induced increment of coronary flow reserve is not abolished by dexamethasone in healthy young men[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2000, 85(5): 1868-1873.

17 Panza-Nduli J, Coulic V, Willems D, et al. Influence of bedside blood insulin measurement on acute coronary syndrome pathways[J]. Crit Pathw Cardiol, 2011, 10(4):185-188.

18 Karrowni W, Li Y, Jones PG, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with significant clinical atherosclerosis in nondiabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2013, 33(9): 2245-2251.

19 Savonitto S, Cohen MG, Politi A, et al. Extent of ST-segment depression and cardiac events in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(20): 2106-2113.

Impact of insulin resistance on early infarction size and cardiac function of non-diabetic patients with acute NSTEMI

XIE Gang1, CAO Shujun1, WANG Zhifeng2
1Department of Cardiology, Daxing Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 102600, China;2Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China

WANG Zhifeng. Email: cladiatora@126.com

ObjectiveTo observe the impact of insulin resistance (IR) on infarct size and cardiac function of non-diabetic patients at early stage of acute NSTEMI.MethodsSixty-nine non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI in Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 6 to July 31 in 2014 were consecutively enrolled in the study. 18-lead ECG was acquired within 10 minutes after admission of each patient, and the sum of ST-segments depression (Sum STD) was calculated. On the 2nd day, the values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) were assessed in all patients with echocardiogram. The homeostatic model assessment index (HOMA index) was also determined on the 2nd day after admission. The patients were divided into insulin resistance (IR) group (HOMA index≥1.7) and non insulin resistance (NIR) group (HOMA index<1.7) according to their HOMA index. The tests of serum creatinine kinase (CK), creatinine kinase MB (CK-MB) and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) were carried out every 6 hours in the first 48 hours after admission to determine the peak values of CK, CK-MB and NT-pro BNP.ResultsOf the 69 patients, 39 (57%) patients were included in IR group while the other 30 patients were included in NIR group. There was no significant difference in basic clinical characteristics including age, sex, histories of smoke, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, the average time of symptom onset to admission and Killip class on admission (P>0.05). Compared with NIR group, the Sum STD and the peak release of CK, CK-MB, NT-pro BNP in patients of IR group was significantly higher (P<0.01). The average values of left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were similar between two groups while the average value of left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) in IR group was significantly higher than in IR group (P<0.01). The average value of left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF) in IR group was significantly decreased compared with NIR group (P<0.01).ConclusionThis research shows high incidence of acute IR at early stage of NSTEMI in non-diabetic patients. The non-diabetic patients with IR has larger infarct size and more seriously impaired leftventricular systolic function than patients without IR at early stage of acute NSTEMI.

insulin resistance; myocardial infarction; cardiac function

R 541.4

A

2095-5227(2015)03-0233-04

10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.03.010

時間:2014-12-17 09:48

http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3275.R.20141217.0948.001.html

2014-09-12

謝剛,男,碩士,主治醫師。2014年1 - 10月在解放軍總醫院進修。研究方向:危重心血管疾病診治。Email: xiegang77@126.com

王峙峰,男,碩士,副主任醫師。Email: cladiatora@126.com

猜你喜歡
胰島素糖尿病
如何選擇和使用胰島素
人人健康(2023年26期)2023-12-07 03:55:46
糖尿病知識問答
中老年保健(2022年5期)2022-08-24 02:35:42
糖尿病知識問答
中老年保健(2022年1期)2022-08-17 06:14:56
糖尿病知識問答
中老年保健(2021年5期)2021-08-24 07:07:20
糖尿病知識問答
中老年保健(2021年9期)2021-08-24 03:51:04
糖尿病知識問答
中老年保健(2021年7期)2021-08-22 07:42:16
糖尿病知識問答
自己如何注射胰島素
門冬胰島素30聯合二甲雙胍治療老年初診2型糖尿病療效觀察
糖尿病的胰島素治療
主站蜘蛛池模板: 手机成人午夜在线视频| 亚洲人成日本在线观看| AV片亚洲国产男人的天堂| 露脸国产精品自产在线播| 成人午夜亚洲影视在线观看| 亚洲中久无码永久在线观看软件| 国产办公室秘书无码精品| 中文字幕久久波多野结衣| 国产不卡网| 国产乱子伦手机在线| 久久久精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲最新网址| 亚洲高清中文字幕在线看不卡| 国产午夜无码片在线观看网站 | 亚洲日韩精品欧美中文字幕 | 怡春院欧美一区二区三区免费| 99视频在线免费观看| 美女内射视频WWW网站午夜| 国产精品极品美女自在线网站| 狠狠亚洲婷婷综合色香| 91破解版在线亚洲| 手机看片1024久久精品你懂的| 91视频区| 国产精品亚洲αv天堂无码| 国产精品天干天干在线观看| 色婷婷电影网| 成年人国产视频| 亚洲综合激情另类专区| 日本在线视频免费| 精品视频在线一区| 亚洲中字无码AV电影在线观看| 欧美精品在线看| 久久a毛片| 国产午夜无码片在线观看网站| 婷婷午夜影院| 日韩天堂视频| 性激烈欧美三级在线播放| 波多野结衣视频网站| 久久99精品久久久大学生| 国产成年无码AⅤ片在线| 国产精品久久久久久影院| 亚洲欧美日韩成人在线| 亚洲一区二区日韩欧美gif| 国产在线视频自拍| AV无码一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美激情小说另类| 黄色污网站在线观看| 日本人又色又爽的视频| P尤物久久99国产综合精品| 亚洲欧美在线看片AI| 欧美综合一区二区三区| 欧美a在线视频| 欧美自慰一级看片免费| 国产欧美高清| 国产精品第一区| 亚洲 成人国产| 国产91高跟丝袜| 亚洲成年人网| 福利一区在线| 亚洲三级影院| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码av喷潮| 九色视频线上播放| 国产靠逼视频| 在线国产毛片| 国产精品精品视频| AV片亚洲国产男人的天堂| 午夜三级在线| 经典三级久久| 国产精品yjizz视频网一二区| 高潮爽到爆的喷水女主播视频| 国产午夜无码片在线观看网站| 色婷婷成人网| 欧美日韩精品综合在线一区| 制服丝袜亚洲| 亚洲av无码片一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品一中文字幕| 色综合久久无码网| 国产欧美视频在线观看| 九九这里只有精品视频| 中文字幕亚洲专区第19页| 国产在线八区| 67194在线午夜亚洲|