
DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2016.32.056
[摘要] 目的 探析PFNA微創治療股骨粗隆間骨折臨床效果。方法 方便選取該院2013年2月—2016年2月收治的60例股骨粗隆間骨折患者,將其隨機分為治療組和對照組,各30例,治療組采取PFNA治療,對照組采取DHS治療,比較兩組臨床效果、手術耗時、術中出血量及并發癥等。結果 治療組手術耗時(68.5±10.3)min、術中出血量(176.3±20.6)mL、住院時間(15.4±4.3)d、愈合時間(10.5±1.4)周,與對照組比較差異有統計學意義,P<0.05;治療組髖關節Harris評分(90.5±4.2)分,優良率96.67%,與對照組比較差異有統計學意義,P<0.05;治療組并發癥發生率6.67%與對照組比較差異有統計學意義,P<0.05。結論 PFNA微創治療股骨粗隆間骨折臨床效果確切,安全有效,值得臨床推廣。
[關鍵詞] PFNA;DHS;股骨粗隆間骨折;臨床效果
[中圖分類號] R68 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2016)11(b)-0056-03
Clinical Analysis of PFNA Minimally Invasive Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture
ZOU Ming-xiang
Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Funing County, Yancheng , Jiangsu Province ,224400 China
[Abstract] Objective Intertrochanteric fracture of the clinical effect of minimally invasive treatment PFNA.Methods Convenient selection our hospital in February 2013 to February 2016 were treated 60 cases of femoral intertrochanteric fracture patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 30 patients in each treatment group take PFNA treatment, the control group received treatment DHS, comparison of two clinical effect, operation time, blood loss and complications.Results Processed operative treatment (68.5 ± 10.3) min, blood loss (176.3 ± 20.6) mL, length of stay (15.4 ± 4.3) d, healing time (10.5 ± 1.4) weeks, significant differences compared with control group, P < 0.05; treatment group Harris hip score(90.5 ± 4.2) points, good rate of 96.67%, compared with control group significantly different P <0.05; treatment group complication rate 6.67% compared with control group significantly different P <0.05.Conclusion PFNA minimally invasive treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the exact effect, worthy of promotion.
[Key words] PFNA; DHS; Intertrochanteric fracture; Clinical effect
股骨粗隆間骨折在臨床上十分常見,發生率是髖部骨折的60%~70%,以老年患者居多。由于機體粗隆部的血運十分豐富,骨折后很容易愈合,不過易發生髖內翻、畸形等情況,對患者生命質量造成影響,影響預后[1-2]。為探析PFNA微創治療股骨粗隆間骨折臨床效果,該文將2013年2月—2016年2月該院收治的60例股骨粗隆間骨折患者,作為研究對象,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選取該院收治的60例股骨粗隆間骨折患者,該次研究患者均簽署知情同意書。將其隨機分為治療組和對照組,各為30例,治療組:男性10例,女性20例,年齡55~80歲,平均(65.6±6.3)歲,受傷因素:交通事故傷11例,摔傷10例,其他9例;對照組:男性12例,女性18例,年齡55~80歲,平均(65.6±6.3)歲,受傷因素:交通事故傷10例,摔傷12例,其他8例;兩組在一般資料上比較差異無統計學意義P>0.05,有可比性。……