Nano-structured Ni-based Active Species Supported on Metallic Substrates as the Efficient Catalysts

Linsheng Wang

Abstract

Nanostructured Ni metal and Ni-Re alloy active species supported on the surface of the total metallic Ni honeycomb substrate and the porous Ni metal substrate are studied as the novel catalyst system for hydrogen generation from steam methane reforming. The bimetallic Ni-Re nano-alloy active species on the surface of the metallic Ni honeycomb substrate or porous Ni metal substrate exhibit the remarkably enhanced activity for steam methane reforming to generate hydrogen especially at lower reaction temperatures. The total metallic catalysts with excellent electric and heat conductivity and almost zero bed pressure loss are expected to be used for the innovation industrial processes.

Keywords： Ni-Re nanofiber; Metallic honeycomb; Porous metal substrate; Total metal catalysts; Ni-Re active sites

1.Introduction

Hydrogen is an energy carrier and one of the important feedstocks in the petroleum and chemical industries and semiconductor industry including the processing of fossil fuels and the production of ammonia. Large amount of hydrogen was consumed worldwide every year and the production of hydrogen plays a key role in modern society because there are no natural hydrogen deposits. About 95% of hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels by steam reforming or partial oxidation of methane and coal gasification with only a small quantity by other routes such as biomass gasification or electrolysis of water [1]. This process includes high temperatures steam （H2O） reacts with methane （CH4） in an endothermic reaction to yield syngas in the first step and additional hydrogen is generated through the lower-temperature exothermic water gas shift reaction in a second step： CO + H2O → CO2 + H2

A highly active and sulfur-tolerant bimetallic Ni–Re catalyst system for hydrogen generation from gasoline fuels by steam reforming and oxidative steam reforming has been reported in our previous studies [2-4]. The promotional effect of Re on the activity and stability of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was found for gasoline reforming to produce hydrogen on Ni–Re-based catalysts at lower reaction temperatures with a green process was developed [5-7]. The high gasoline conversion of 100% is maintained very well during 700 h of operation for steam reforming of desulfurized gasoline feed at lower reaction temperatures. It has been proposed that the high activity and sulfur tolerance of Ni– Re/Al2O3 may be due to the alloying of Ni with Re to form the bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles. On the other hand， it has been recently reported that Ni honeycomb exhibited catalytic activity for methane steam reforming （MSR） under low steam-to-carbon ratio and gas hourly space velocity （SV） conditions [8-9]. Low pressure drop per catalyst volume and fast heat and mass transport are the evident advantages of the metallic honeycomb catalysts by comparison with conventional pelleted catalysts [10–12]. These advantages are desirable for their industrial applications in hydrogen production systems if the activity of the Ni honeycomb catalyst especially at lower temperatures is impoved even under higher SV. In the present presentation， nanostructured Ni and Ni-Re active species are fabricated on the surface of the total metallic Ni honeycomb and the porous Ni metal as the novel catalyst system for hydrogen generation from steam methane reforming.

2.Experimental

2.1. Ni Honeycomb Preparation and Catalytic Reaction

The pure Ni honeycomb substrate （diameter 6mm， height 5mm） was assembled by combining 30μm thick ?at and wave-shaped pure Ni foils. Ni nanoparticles were supported on the surface of Ni honeycomb substrate to obtain the Ni/Ni honeycomb sample by impregnating the Ni honeycomb substrate in aqueous solution of Ni（NO3）2 at room temperature， followed by drying and calcination. Ni-Re nanoparticles were supported on Ni honeycomb substrate and porous Ni metal substrate to obtain the Ni-Re/Ni honeycomb sample and Ni-Re/porous Ni sample by using the same method as described in the reference [1，2，7]. All the samples were reduced by flowing H2 at 553K for 2h before the catalytic tests. The catalytic tests were carried out in the temperature range of 673-1173K at atmospheric pressure for steam reforming of methane in a ?xed bed continuous-?ow quartz reactor.

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

The nanostructured honeycomb catalysts were characterized by XRD， SEM-EDAX etc. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller （BET） speci?c surface area of the honeycomb before and after the reactions was measured with Kr adsorption using a surface area analyzer （Micromeritics， ASAP 2020）. The surface morphology was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope （SEM; JEOL， JSM-7000F） coupled with an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy （EDS） system.

3.Results

3.1 Activity Improvement of Ni Honeycomb by Deposition of Ni Nanoparticles on Its Surface

The activities of the Ni honeycomb substrate and the Ni honeycomb coated with Ni nanoparticles （Ni/Ni honeycomb） for steam methane reforming at SV of 1200h-1 and a reaction temperature of 973K are compared in Fig 1.

We can see from Fig 1 that the conversion of methane on the Ni honeycomb substrate is only about 10% under the given reaction conditions. However， the conversion of methane on the Ni substrate coated with Ni nanoparticles （Ni/Ni honeycomb） is more than 80% under the same reaction conditions.? The much higher activity of the Ni/Ni honeycomb than that of the pure Ni honeycomb substrate is contributed to the Ni nanoparticles coated on the Ni honeycomb substrate. Therefor coating of Ni nanoparticles on the surface of Ni honeycomb substrate is effective to improve the catalytic activity of the pure Ni honeycomb catalyst at lower reaction temperature and higher SV. Therefore the activity of the Ni honeycomb catalysts can be remarkably enhanced by depositing the Ni nanoparticles on the surface of the honeycomb Ni. The methane conversion on the Ni/Ni-honeycomb at the reaction temperature of 973K and SV of 1200h-1 and the mole ratio of CH4/H2O/N2 of 3/5/1 is about 80%， which is about 5 time higher than that on the Ni honeycomb substrate.

It is clear in Fig 2 that 3 XRD peaks of the peak at the 2 theta angel of 52 degree， the Ni （220） peak at the 2 theta angel of 77degree and the Ni （311） peak at the 2 theta angel of 93 degree are appeared on the Ni honeycomb substrate. The Ni （111） peak at the 2 theta angel of 44.5 degree is also appeared after Ni nanoparticles is deposited on the surface of the honeycomb Ni， which is not appeared on the Ni honeycomb substrate. Therefore， the Ni （111） peak at the 2 theta angel of about 44.5 degree is assigned to the Ni nanoparticles supported on the Ni honeycomb substrate. The increased activity of Ni/honeycomb Ni is ascribed to the high activity of the Ni nanoparticle on the surface of the Ni honeycomb.

3.2 Effect of alloying of Ni with Re to form Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles on the surface of Ni honeycomb

We can see from Fig 3 that the activity of Ni-Re/Ni-honeycomb catalyst is evidently higher than that of Ni/Ni honeycomb catalyst at the lower reaction temperatures of 673K and 723 K. This indicates that the bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles formed by alloying of Ni with Re is more active that the monometallic Ni nanoparticles supported on the surface of Ni honeycomb Ni substrate for steam methane reforming to generate hydrogen. The activities of the two catalysts become close with increasing reaction temperature as shown in Fig 3. This indicates that the steam methane reforming reaction becomes thermochemical equilibrium with increasing the reaction temperature.

We can see from Table 1 that the activity enhancement of the Ni/Ni honeycomb catalyst for steam methane reforming by surface alloying of Ni with Re to form Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles become more remarkably at the increasing space velocity （SV）. The methane conversion on Ni （2.5wt.%）-Re （0.25wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst is about 2 times higher than that on Ni （2.5 wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst at a SV of 4000h-1 and the methane conversion on Ni （2.5wt.%）-Re （0.25wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst is about 7 times higher than that on Ni （2.5 wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst at a SV of 7200h-1 as shown in Table 1. We also can see the comparison between the activity of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （0.5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb for steam methane reforming at a low reaction temperature of 723K and high SV of 4000h-1 and 7200h-1 in Table 1. It is shown in Table 1 that the activity enhancement of the Ni/Ni honeycomb catalyst for steam methane reforming by surface alloying of Ni with Re to form Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles become more evidently at the increasing space velocity （SV）. The methane conversion on Ni （5wt.%）-Re （0.5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalysts is about 22% and 18% respectively at a SV of 4000h-1 and the methane conversion on Ni （5wt.%）-Re （0.5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalyst and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalysts is about 22% and 16% respectively at a higher SV of 7200h-1 as shown in Table 1.? The CO2 selectivity on Ni/Ni honeycomb catalysts is higher than that on Ni-Re/Ni honeycomb catalysts. The activity of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb， Ni （5wt.%）-Re （10wt.%）/Ni honeycomb and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb catalysts for steam methane reforming at different reaction temperatures and a high SV of 20000h-1 are studied. The activity of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb and Ni （5wt.%）-Re （10wt.%）/Ni are much higher than that of the Ni/Ni honeycomb catalyst for steam methane reforming at the high space velocity （SV） of 20000 h-1 and a wide range of reaction temperatures. However， the activity of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （10wt.%）/Ni honeycomb is a little higher than that of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb. We also use porous Ni with average pore size of 450?m as substrate to prepare the Ni（10wt%）/porous-Ni and Ni（10wt%）-Re（1wt%）/porous-Ni catalysts for steam methane reforming. The activities of the Ni（10wt%）/porous Ni and Ni（10wt%）-Re（1wt%）/porous Ni catalysts for steam methane reforming at a wide range of reaction temperature from 673K to 1173K are compared in Fig 4. We can see from Fig 4 that the Ni（10wt%）-Re（1wt%）/porous Ni catalyst exhibits the evident activity at 673K and methane conversion increases with increasing reaction temperature from 673K to 1173K. However， the starting reaction temperature for catalyzing steam methane reforming on Ni（10wt%）/porous Ni is about 1023K. Therefor the activity Ni/porous Ni for steam methane reforming is remarkably enhanced by surface alloying of Ni with Re to form Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles on the porous Ni substrate as shown in Fig 4.

The structures of the bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles and the monometallic Ni nanoparticles are examined by XRD. Fig 5 shows the XRD patterns of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （2wt.%）/Ni honeycomb， Ni （5wt.%）-Re （1wt.%）/Ni honeycomb， Ni （5wt.%）-Re （0.5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb samples. We can see from Fig 5 that the Ni （111） peak at 2theta angel of 44.5 degree become wider after alloying of Ni nanoparticles with Re to form Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles. This indicates that the surface alloying of Ni with Re improving the dispersion of the Ni nanoparticles on the Ni honeycomb. In order to observe the change of Ni （111） peak more clearly after surface alloying of Ni with Re， we enlarge the XRD patterns from 2 theta angel range from 40 to 50 degree as shown in Fig 5. XRD patterns of Ni （5wt.%）-Re （2wt.%）/Ni honeycomb， Ni （5wt.%）-Re （1wt.%）/Ni honeycomb， Ni （5wt.%）-Re （0.5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb and Ni （5wt.%）/Ni honeycomb samples is enlarged at the 2theta angel of 40-50 and 75.5-77 in Fig 5.

We can clearly see from Fig 5 that a new peak near the Ni （111） peak is appeared on Ni-Re/Ni honeycomb samples. However， this new peak is not appeared on Ni/Ni honeycomb sample. Therefor this new XRD peak is assigned to the Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles formed by surface alloying of Ni with Re. The monometallic Ni nanoparticles are synthesized by reduction of their oxide precursors of NiO and the bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles are synthesized by their precursors of NiO·ReOx. The precursors of the bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles and the monometallic Ni nanoparticles are observed by SEM and their images are shown in Fig 6.

We can find from Fig 6 that the SEM images of the precursors for bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles are look quite different from the SEM images of the precursors for monometallic Ni nanoparticles. The SEM images of the precursors for bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles look like the nanofibers. The SEM images of the precursors for monometallic Ni nanoparticles are nanoparticles.

Conclusion

Two types of total metallic catalysts of Ni honeycomb and porous Ni which are deposited with bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles with excellent electric and heat conductivity and almost zero bed pressure loss are successfully fabricated. The surface alloying effect of Ni with Re lead to the appearing of new XRD peak which is assigned to the synthesized bimetallic Ni-Re nanoparticles. The bimetallic Ni-Re alloy nanoparticles deposited on Ni honeycomb substrate or porous Ni substrate exhibit the remarkably enhanced activity for steam methane reforming to generate hydrogen especially at lower reaction temperatures by comparison with the monometallic Ni nanoparticles deposited on the Ni honeycomb substrate or porous Ni substrate.

References

[1]. Ogden， J.M. Prospects for building a hydrogen energy infrastructure. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 1999， 24： 227–279. doi：10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.227.

[2]. Wang，L， Murata，K， Inaba M， Development of Novel Highly Active and Sulphur-Tolerant Catalysts for Steam Reforming of Liquid Hydrocarbons to Produce Hydrogen， Applied Catalysis A： General， 2004， 257， 43-47.

[3]. Wang L， Murata K， Inaba M， Appl. Catal. B： Environ. Control of the product ratio of CO2/（CO+CO2） and inhibition of catalyst deactivation for steam reforming of gasoline to produce hydrogen”， Applied Catalysis B： Environmental， 2004， 48， 243-248.

[4]. Wang L， Murata K， Inaba M， Conversion of liquid hydrocarbons into H2 and CO2 by integration of reforming and water-gas shift reaction on highly active multifunctional catalysts”， Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research， 2004， 43， 3228-3232.

[5]. Wang L， Murata K， Inaba M， “Steam reforming of gasoline promoted by partial oxidation reaction on novel bimetallic Ni-based catalysts to generate hydrogen for fuel cells powered automobile applications”， Journal of Power Sources， 2005， 145， 707-7112005.

[6]. Wang L， Murata K， Matsumura Y， Inaba M， Lower-temperature catalytic performance of bimetallic Ni-Re/Al2O3 catalyst for gasoline reforming to produce hydrogen with inhibiting formation of methane”， Energy & Fuels， 2006， 20， 1377-1381.

[7]. Wang L， Murata K， Inaba M， Highly efficient conversion of gasoline into hydrogen on Al2O3-supported Ni-based catalysts： catalyst stability enhancement by modification with W”， Applied Catalysis A： General， 2009， 358， 264-268.

[8]. Fukuhara C， Yamamoto K， Makiyama Y， Kawasaki W， Watanabe R， A metal honeycomb-type structured catalyst for steam reforming of methane： e?ect of preparation condition change on reforming performance， Appl. Catal. A： Gen. 2015， 492， 190–200

[9]. Hiramitsu Y， Demura M， Xu Y， Yoshida M， Hirano T， Catalytic properties of pure Ni honeycomb catalysts for methane steam reforming， Appl. Catal. A： Gen. 2015， 507， 162–168.

[10]. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M， Voecks G E， Charng T， Modeling of heat-transfer in nonadiabatic monolith reactors and experimental comparisons of metal monoliths with packed-beds， Chem. Eng. Sci. 1986， 41， 1203–1212.

[11]. Farrauto R J， Liu Y， Ruettinger W， Ilinich O， Shore L， Giroux T， Precious metal catalysts supported on ceramic and metal monolithic structures for the hydrogen economy， Catal. Rev. 2007， 49， 141–196.

[12]. Xu Y， Harimoto T， Wang L， Hirano T， Kunieda H， Hara Y， Miyata Y， E， ect of steam and hydrogen treatments on the catalytic activity of pure Ni honeycomb for methane steam reforming， Chemical Engineering & Processing： Process Intensi?cation， 2018， 129， 63-70