高志軍


[摘要] 目的 通過兩種不同手術方式治療腹股溝斜疝,對其臨床療效進行對比分析。 方法 隨機選取2011年4月—2012年7月入住該院進行治療的180例腹股溝斜疝患者,將其隨機分為對照組和觀察組,每組各90例患者,對照組患者采取傳統修補術進行治療,觀察組采取無張力修補術進行治療。進行為期2年的隨訪,對兩組患者的療效進行觀察。 結果 對兩組患者的手術時間、自主下床活動時間、住院時間進行對比,觀察組患者均優于對照組。對兩組患者的血清炎癥介質進行對比,如白細胞、C-反應細胞、血清纖維蛋白質以及a1-抗胰蛋白酶,觀察組患者的各項指標均優于對照組患者,說明無張力修補術治療腹股溝斜疝具有更顯著的療效,P<0.05,其差異有統計學意義。 結論 無張力修補術具有并發癥少、適應癥寬、療效較好的優點,值得進一步在臨床上推廣使用。
[關鍵詞] 無張力修補術;傳統修補術;腹股溝斜疝;臨床療效
[中圖分類號] R656.21 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2015)04(c)-0067-02
[Abstract] Objective Through two different ways of?operation?in treatment of?inguinal hernia,?compare the?clinical efficacy. Methods 180 cases of inguinal hernia patients in our hospital from April 2011 to July 2012 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 90 patients in each group, the control group of patients taking traditional repair treatment, observation group taking tension-free repair treatment. For a period of 2 years of follow-up, the efficacy of the two groups were observed. Results Operation time, independent ambulation time, hospitalization time of two groups were compared, the patients of observation group was better than control group.Comparison of serum inflammatory mediators in patients of the two groups, such as white blood cells, C- cells, serum reaction fibrous protein and a1- antitrypsin, the indexes of observed group of patients was better than those of the control group; tension free repair in treatment of indirect inguinal hernia has more significant effect, P<0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion The tension-free repair has fewer complications, indications wide, good effect, worthy of further promoting the use in clinical practice.
[Key words]Tension-free repair;Traditional repair;Inguinal hernia;Clinical efficacy
腹股溝斜疝是一種常見的外科疾病,主要是由于臨床治療引起嵌頓性疝,從而造成腸壞死[1]。治療腹股溝斜疝的主要方式為無張力修補術和傳統修補術。該研究隨機選取2011年月—2012年7月間該院收治的180例腹股溝斜疝患者為研究對象,將對這兩種治療腹股溝斜疝的手術方式進行分析,探討不同手術方式的療效,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選取入住該院進行治療的180例腹股溝斜疝患者作為研究對象,其中男性患者111例,女性患者69例,患者的年齡區間為21~83歲,患者平均年齡為(52.3±31.2)歲。將這180例患者隨機分為對照組和觀察組,對照組患……