
[摘要] 目的 對治療患者的口腔頜面部多間隙感染過程中,采取雙管負壓引流法取得的效果以及具有的安全性進行探討。方法 方便選取該院外科在2016年3—9月期間內,進行治療的口腔頜面部多間隙感染患者70例為分析對象,將全部患者分成對照組(35例)與觀察組(35例),觀察組在治療中選擇了雙管負壓引流法,而對照組選擇的是傳統的切開引流法,該兩組患者均是依據膿液的細菌培養情況來用抗生素實施治療,并將兩組患者在治療之后的感染間隙愈合情況進行對比。 結果 觀察組的全部患者治療的有效率達到100.00%,明顯高于對照組(88.57%),兩組患者的有效率對比差異有統計學意義(χ2=5.042,P<0.05)。 結論 總之,對口腔頜面部多間隙感染患者進行治療時,采取雙管負壓引流法與傳統的切開引流法有更好的效果,具有很大的臨床推廣價值。
[關鍵詞] 雙管負壓引流;面部多間隙感染;口腔疾病治療
[中圖分類號] R246.83 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2016)12(c)-0079-03
[Abstract] Objective To study the effect of double-tube negative pressure drainage and its safety in the treatment of oral and maxillofacial multi-gap infection. Methods Convenient selection 70 cases of oral and maxillofacial multi-gap infection were treated in our hospital from March 2016 to September 2016. All patients were divided into control group (35 cases) and observation group 35 cases), the observation group in the treatment of choice of double-tube negative pressure drainage method, and the control group selected the traditional incision and drainage method, the two groups of patients are based on bacterial culture of pus to antibiotic treatment, And the healing of infection gap between the two groups after treatment was compared. Results The effective rate of all the patients in the observation group was 100.00%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (88.57%). There was significant difference between the two groups (χ2=5.042,P<0.05). Conclusion In short, the treatment of oral and maxillofacial multi-gap infection, the use of double-tube negative pressure drainage method and the traditional incision and drainage method has a better effect, with great clinical value.
[Key words] Double tube negative pressure drainage; Facial multi-gap infection; Oral disease treatment
口腔頜面部單間隙感染被看成是口腔頜面外科之中的一種易發病與常見病,該病不但起病很急、而且發展迅速,如果沒有及時進行治療或者采取的治療措施不當,則該病就會更大范圍的擴散,進而發展為多間隙感染[1],使患者呼吸更加困難、引起危害極大的并發癥(如:膿毒血癥與菌血癥等),嚴重的還會導致死亡。為了探討有效的治療方法,在臨床上對于頜面部多間隙感染患者,該院方便選擇外科在2016年3—9月期間內進行治療的口腔頜面部多間隙感染患者70例為分析對象,采用雙管負壓引流法進行治療,并將該療法和傳統的切開引流法做了全面對比,取得了滿意的研究結果,現報道如下。……