
[摘要] 目的 探討疤痕子宮再次妊娠分娩方式的選擇。方法 整群選取對2015年10月—2016年5月期間在該院產科分娩的209例疤痕子宮再次妊娠產婦的臨床資料進行回顧性分析,根據分娩方式的不同將209例產婦分為自然分娩組(陰道試產成功后經陰道分娩,72例)和剖宮產組(137例),分析不同分娩方式對母嬰健康狀況的影響。結果 回顧兩組產婦的臨床資料發現,自然分娩組產婦的產前BMI值較剖宮產組產婦小(P<0.05),既往有自然分娩史的產婦所占比例較剖宮產組(P<0.05)高,產后失血量和住院費用均較剖宮產組產婦少(P<0.05),產后并發癥發生率為2.7%,較剖宮產組產婦的12.4%低(P<0.05)。兩組均無圍產兒死亡,自然分娩組新生兒的體重較剖宮產組輕(P<0.05)。結論 疤痕子宮再次妊娠孕婦選擇自然分娩對母嬰健康產生的影響更小。臨床應加強對疤痕子宮再次妊娠孕婦的產前宣教,指導孕婦正確認識自然分娩。
[關鍵詞] 疤痕子宮;再次妊娠;分娩方式;母嬰健康;影響
[中圖分類號] R714 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2016)12(c)-0076-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the mode of delivery again scar uterus choice. Methods Group selection the clinical data of pregnant women during the period from October 2015 to May 2016 again in 209 cases of uterine scar in our hospital obstetric delivery were retrospectively analyzed, according to the different modes of delivery will be divided into 209 cases of maternal vaginal delivery group (vaginal delivery after vaginal delivery, 72 cases) and cesarean section group(137 cases), analysis of the influence of different modes of delivery on maternal and infant health. Results The clinical information of two groups found that prenatal BMI natural delivery group compared with cesarean section(P<0.05), who had little maternal history of natural childbirth the proportion of a cesarean section group(P<0.05), postpartum blood loss and hospitalization expenses were cesarean section(P<0.05), less postpartum complication rate was 2.7%, compared with the cesarean section group 12.4% low(P<0.05). Two groups were perinatal Fetal death, neonatal weight than natural childbirth group cesarean section group(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of smaller uterine scar pregnancy, pregnant women choose natural birth on maternal and child health. Clinical should strengthen the prenatal education of the uterine scar pregnancy in pregnant women, pregnant women to guide correct understanding of natural childbirth.
[Key words] Scar uterus; Re pregnancy; Delivery mode; Maternal and infant health; Influence
疤痕子宮再次妊娠是指既往有剖宮產史或外科手術史導致子宮留下疤痕的女性再次妊娠[1]。由于疤痕子宮再次妊娠孕婦存在發生子宮破裂、產后出血等并發癥的風險,易對母嬰健康產生影響,因此在分娩方式的選擇上需要慎重考慮[2]。疤痕子宮再次妊娠孕婦的分娩方式包括自然分娩和再次剖宮產分娩。總結較長一段時間的臨床應用經驗發現,兩種分娩方式各存在利弊,故針對疤痕子宮再次妊娠孕婦該選擇何種分娩方式一直存在爭議[3]。……