戴曉彤
摘 要:近年來,隨著區塊鏈存證技術在我國在線仲裁領域實踐的不斷推進,在在線仲裁中為當事人提供區塊鏈存證服務的行業已初具規模。但各平臺運營主體數量的不斷增長客觀上造成市面上存證服務和產品魚龍混雜的現象,同時針對該新興技術在仲裁領域內的應用也缺乏配套性規定予以指導。此外,除卻上述仲裁實踐中顯現的表層問題,區塊鏈存證技術自身亦潛伏著容量超負荷風險與“去中心化”的自我矛盾等深層次問題。因此,筆者以我國主流仲裁機構及第三方商業主體對區塊鏈存證技術的應用實踐為研究對象,通過對現存問題的自我審視與對潛在風險的深度挖掘,探索我國在線仲裁中區塊鏈存證技術應用的完善進路。
Abstract: In these years, with the development of blockchain technology in the field of online arbitration in China, the industry of the storage of digital evidence with blockchain technology for parties in online arbitration has begun to take shape. However, the growth of the number of platforms results in the mixture of good and bad products existing in the market. At the same time, the application of this emerging technology in arbitration field is also lack of regulation and direction. In addition, there are also deep-seated problems such as the risk of capacity overload and self-contradiction of "decentralization". Therefore, taking the practical experiences of arbitration institutions and third-party for-profit platforms as subjects, through the self-examination in current issues and the in-depth mining of potential risks, author explores the approaches to develop the blockchain technology in online arbitration in China.
關鍵詞:區塊鏈;在線仲裁;電子證據
Key Words: blockchain; online arbitration; digital evidence
一、區塊鏈存證技術在我國在線仲裁領域的實踐現狀
(一)在線仲裁中區塊鏈存證服務的行業現狀
在當前的在線仲裁實踐中為當事人提供區塊鏈存證服務的平臺主要有兩類。第一類是由仲裁機構搭建的適用于在線仲裁程序的電子存證平臺,例如2017年廣州仲裁委員會聯合微眾銀行、杭州亦筆科技三方基于區塊鏈技術搭建的“仲裁鏈”,又如南京仲裁委員會于2018年搭建完成的網絡仲裁平臺,協同存證機構、金融機構、其他仲裁機構等對電子數據的存管,實現證據實時保全。第二類是以營利為目的的第三方電子存證平臺,例如“易保全”、“存證云”、“法大大”等區塊鏈取證存證平臺,當前我國諸多仲裁機構采取與之合作的形式為當事人提供區塊鏈存證服務。……