業主:巴彥淖爾市教育局
設計單位:中國建筑設計研究院有限公司
設計團隊:曹曉昕、詹紅、董欣、周龍
用地面積:20 000 平方米
建筑面積:18 620 平方米
建筑高度:20.5 米
設計時間:2008 -2009年
竣工時間:2011年
Client: Bayannur Education Bureau
Architect: China Architectural Design and Research Group
Design team: Cao Xiaoxin,Zhan Hong,Dong Xin,Zhou Long
Site area: 20,000 m2
Built: 18,620 m2
Height: 20.5 m
Design Date: 2008 -2009
Completion Date: 2011
設計與構思
設計將教育信息網絡中心的復雜功能整合在一個方形合院中,實現了功能空間的整合和單元分區的靈活使用,建筑外部造型簡潔規整,用材低價而不廉價。建筑設計成為低造價下的多功能建筑綜合體的一種實驗性嘗試,采用白色涂料墻面和深色窗框,形成簡潔干凈的現代建筑造型,巧合地回到現代建筑運動時的起點——包豪斯。
項目開始時,新建設區的土地上已經開始了對老城區的復制之路,從城市發展的角度,團隊擔心新建設區相對老城區的土地資源優勢沒有顯現。團隊首先將項目設計的目的性轉化為對新城復制老城建設現狀的批判,用現代主義的價值觀和審美觀為未來的建設提供在此之外的可能性。具體來講,就是用空間的創造形成城市與使用者交流的新方式,而不是通過立面的組織讓建筑與城市發生簡單的圖像關系,而這種圖像的簡單關聯基本上是將使用者排除在外的。
在這個2.3 萬平方米的項目里,容積率的指標讓團隊看到了兼顧效率的同時為人提供辦公活動的閑散與自由狀態的可能性,在一個不大的房子里戲劇般地將看似雜亂無章的功能組織起來 。
在新區建設中,2 萬多平米的項目確實是一個小房子,小房子配大用地是奢侈的,然而低容積率也為設計團隊提供了降低建筑密度、轉換為豐富庭院空間的可能。豐富的內院與建筑簡潔完整的立面相互配合,建筑最終以低廉的造價打造出高品質的景觀辦公環境。

Design Concept
The design integrates the complex functions of the education information network center in a square courtyard,the integration of functional space and the flexibility of using unit zoning are realized and the exterior shape of the building is simple and regular,with low-cost but not cheap materials.The design of the building became an experimental attempt to create a multifunctional building complex at a low cost.The walls with white paintings and dark window frames,forced by the low cost,form a simple and clean modern architectural style,coincidentally returning to the Bauhaus style,the starting point of the modern architectural movement.
Upon the commencement of the project,the road to replicate the old city had already started on the land of the new construction area.I expressed some concern from the perspective of urban development;at least we don't want to see that the advantageous land resources have not shown for the relatively new area as compared with the old city.We first transformed the purpose of the project into a tit-for-tat critique for the new city's replication of the old city's construction status quo,i.e.,to use modernist values and aesthetics to offer possibilities for future construction beyond this,specifically,to create a new way of communication between the city and its users through the creation of space,rather than a simple pictorial relationship between the building and the city through the organization of the fa?ade,which essentially excludes the users.
In a project of only 23 000 square meters,the indicator of plot ratio allows us to see the possibility of a leisurely and free state of office activities while taking into account efficiency.The seemingly disorganized functions are organized dramatically in a small house: multi-functional meeting and performance center,office business premise,training and living service rooms.The three sectors are relatively independent and contain many different functional blocks: The office business premises in turn include the Education Bureau,Examination Center,Information Center,Teaching and Research Office,Supervisory Group of the People's Government,Work-Study Center,People's Education Foundation,Education Accounting Center,Student Financial Assistance Center,Vocational Education Center,Putonghua Testing Center,etc.;training and living services include guest rooms,restaurants,fitness,outdoor courts,etc.
Design weaken the boundaries among these three systems,open space is equably embedded in the site,so the building gets very strong introversion,and at the same time,a conversation of space between the building and its surrounding is created at its four sides except the western edge,and a continuous space connects all of interior functional space.We emphasize the urban space between the building and the city to weaken facades of the building,and abandon deliberately the decoration for the facade to avoid a pictorial memory,what we have done is return coincidentally the starting point of the modernism movement of architecture — “Bauhaus”.We tried to avoid the typical plan of “Bauhaus” from the beginning to the final construction drawings,that is,to avoid the white walls and dark window frames,and choose inexpensive and dark grey tiles and window frames.Counterproductively,because of the deficiency of project financing and in order to finish as soon as possible,the owner was required to simplify the original design,and to change grey tiles into painting.Although,this requirement is antagonistic to our original intention,we are unwilling to carry it out,but finally,this building shows the “Bauhaus” characteristics not only in the starting thinking point,but also in the completed project image.

總平面圖

一層平面圖
材料與建構
規整統一的連續外界面作為城市與建筑連接的紐帶,旨在弱化立面的形態,刻意回避立面圖像記憶和裝飾比例的運用。
設計方案外立面材質原本擬采用淺灰色的陶土磚、白色的窗框與印刷玻璃,然而在結構還未封頂時,業主方由于資金緊張,要求立面從簡,取消陶土磚、印刷玻璃;不做外立面,或換言之取消了外立面與裝飾有關的任何東西,團隊不得已將陶土劈開磚變更為白色涂料。這實際上是一個機會,讓設計得以重新回到現代主義與古典裝飾主義決裂的時刻。最終,無論是主觀憎恨裝飾還是客觀被迫取消,結果都一樣,建筑與裝飾無關了。最終巧合地讓建筑不僅從出發點的思考,到最終呈現的結果都回到了包豪斯的經典特征。外墻用白色涂料顯示“無”的存在。團隊將原本深陷的窗洞口與墻面調平,讓墻體的體積感與重量感 消失,同時解決白色涂料積灰“流淚”的問題。
這個在內蒙古臨河蒼茫大地上悄悄矗立起的建筑,并不高大雄偉,但是建成后很多人覺得很好,但又不知該如何形容它。對于不知包豪斯為何物的當地住民來講,新鮮的視覺刺激甚至讓他們覺得這建筑是空降的,而團隊作為建筑的設計者深知這“降落”的過程既有某種機緣的相契,又有很多事不得已而為之的無奈。降落更像是一種迫降吧!
對于當今中國城市,尤其是二、三線城市,由于現代主義建筑思想的缺失導致了城市決策者和設計師將現代主義扭曲地理解和幼稚地運用,補上這一課的意義并不代表現代主義在解決城市問題的優越和萬能,恰恰相反,有關現代主義的思考能夠搭建一個讓人們深入思考的平臺,產生新的價值和文化。從這一點看,中國城市建設的發展不會也不可能跨越現代主義這道門檻,它是啟發不同價值觀展現在城市中的起點。
內景與外景
設計營造出豐富的內院空間,促進城市和使用者之間的交流與互動。在整體規模不大的建筑里戲劇性地組織了豐富的功能,多功能會演中心、辦公業務用房、培訓及生活服務用房三個板塊相對獨立,三個板塊又容納了教育局、考試中心、信息中心、教研室、人民政府督導團、勤工儉學中心、人民教育基金會、教育會計中心、學生資助中心、職業教育中心、普通話測試中心,培訓及生活服務包括客房、餐廳、健身、室外球場等復雜的功能。

This building is built up on this vast land of Inner Mongolia without any disturbing,neither high nor huge,but because of the contrast with its surrounding that creates a visual conflict,it becomes ironically a landmark (which is the purpose of those buildings around want to achieve by its height and whimsy),but this kind of feature is difficult to be described commonly as majestic,magnificent,or glorious.In consequence,when it is built up,many people like it very much,but they don’t know how to describe it.These local inhabitants don’t know what is “Bauhaus”,so this building gives them a new visual stimulation by landing accidentally.However,we architects know all the story of this “landing” which includes lots of unwillingness.So this “landing” is more like to be forced!
At present,in the cities especially the second-tier or third-tier,because of the lack of ideology of modernism,many designers and government officials have misunderstood it and have applied it in a naive way.To go over this lesson doesn’t mean modernism is super predominant and can solve all of the urban problems.On the contrary,the popularity of modernism will also explode and leave serious problems which will leave us to think and rethink to generate a new value and culture.From this point of view,the development of urbanization in China can’t cross the threshold of modernism;it is the starting point that inspires different values.


設計將三大功能體塊的邊界進行了模糊,把戶外空間均質地嵌入用地內,運用內外空間的滲透完成建筑功能的連貫,并巧妙地為不同功能造出豐富的過渡性入口空間,營造出共享的內院空間。同時在南、北、董三個方向與城市公共空間形成了良好的對話。
Just as what Mr.Ai Weiwei said in his book Time and Place: The world of spirit today needs a new aesthetic judgment and value,like a lotus pond waiting for another heavy shower.
Material and Construction
The original design for facade is composed by light grey terracotta bricks,white window frames and printed glass.When the construction of structure has not yet been completely finished,the owner came and told me that the budget of project was insufficient,so we had to simplify the design;terracotta bricks and printed glass have also been canceled.Without any decoration for the facade,or the cancellation of facade and anything related to decoration,this action gave us a chance to face the moment when the modernism broke up with the classicism.Whether because of a subjective dislike or a compelled abandon,we have to face the same consequence: the decoration is unconcerned in this project.
The white paint does a metaphor of “void” in the sense of Zen.Reduce the distance between the openings and the wall to weaken the thickness of the wall,and at the same time,we can solve the problem of dirty traces on the white wall because of dust.
Inside and Outside
The design creatively creates a rich inner courtyard space that promotes communication and interaction between the city and its users.The design dramatically organizes a wealth of functions in a building of modest size,with three relatively independent sections: a multi-functional meeting and performance center,office business premise,training and living service rooms.Design weaken the boundaries among these three sections,open space is equably embedded in the site,so the building gets very strong introversion,and at the same time,a conversation of space between the building and its surrounding is created at its four sides except the western edge.It emphasizes the role of space as a link between the city and the building,and weakens the form of the fa?ade.


剖面圖
