

[摘要]"目的"探討凍結肩發病的危險因素,為凍結肩的預防提供依據。方法"選取2020年1月至2022年8月于浙江中醫藥大學附屬第一醫院住院的114例凍結肩患者納入病例組,同期無凍結肩病史的體檢者114名納入對照組。收集兩組研究對象的臨床資料,采用多因素Logistic回歸分析探討凍結肩發病的危險因素。結果"兩組研究對象的神經根型頸椎病、2型糖尿病、肝炎、慢性非萎縮性胃炎、腰椎間盤突出癥、骨質疏松、甲狀腺結節病比較差異均有統計學意義(Plt;0.05);多因素Logistic分析結果顯示,神經根型頸椎病(OR=6.114,95%CI:1.458~25.642)和2型糖尿病(OR=24.069,95%CI:4.023~144.007)均是影響凍結肩發病的獨立危險因素。結論"2型糖尿病、神經根型頸椎病患者發生凍結肩的風險較高,應重點關注進行早期預防。
[關鍵詞]"凍結肩;2型糖尿病;神經根型頸椎病
[中圖分類號]"R274.31""""""[文獻標識碼]"A""""[DOI]"10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2024.10.003
Analysis"of"risk"factors"of"frozen"shoulder
XIANG"Li1,"SONG"Hongquan2,"DU"Honggen2,"XIONG"Junlong2,"JIN"Yaoyu1,"QIAO"Zukang2
1.The"First"Clinical"Medical"School"of"Zhejiang"Chinese"Medical"University,"Hangzhou"310053,"Zhejiang,"China;"2.Department"of"Massage,"the"First"Affiliated"Hospital"of"Zhejiang"Chinese"Medical"University,"Hangzhou"310003,"Zhejiang,"China
[Abstract]"Objective"To"explore"the"risk"factors"of"frozen"shoulder,"and"to"provide"the"basis"for"the"prevention"of"frozen"shoulder."Methods"A"total"of"114"patients"with"frozen"shoulder"who"were"hospitalized"in"the"First"Affiliated"Hospital"of"Zhejiang"Chinese"Medical"University"from"January"2020"to"August"2022"were"included"in"case"group,"and"114"physical"examination"patients"with"no"history"of"frozen"shoulder"were"included"in"control"group."The"clinical"data"of"two"groups"were"collected"and"the"risk"factors"of"frozen"shoulder"were"analyzed"by"multivariate"Logistic"regression."Results"There"were"statistically"significant"differences"in"cervical"radiculopathy,"type"2"diabetes"mellitus,"hepatitis,"chronic"non-atrophic"gastritis,"lumbar"disc"herniation,"osteoporosis"and"thyroid"sarcoidosis"between"two"groups"(Plt;0.05)."Multivariate"Logistic"analysis"showed"that"cervical"radiculopathy"(OR=6.114,"95%CI:"1.458-25.642)"and"type"2"diabetes"mellitus"(OR=24.069,"95%CI:"4.023-144.007)"were"independent"risk"factors"for"the"onset"of"frozen"shoulder."Conclusion"Patients"with"type"2"diabetes"mellitus"and"cervical"radiculopathy"have"a"higher"risk"of"frozen"shoulder,"and"should"pay"attention"to"early"prevention.
[Key"words]"Frozen"shoulder;"Type"2"diabetes"mellitus;"Cervical"radiculopathy
凍結肩是以肩關節周圍疼痛、各方向主動和被動活動受限為主要臨床表現的一種常見病。凍結肩發病高峰在40~70歲,患病率為2%~5%,女性略高于男性,左肩更容易受累[1]。過去認為凍結肩是2~3年內可自愈的自限性疾病,但最新研究表明20%~"50%的患者存在療效不佳、疼痛及功能受限改善不理想等情況[2]。凍結肩的病因及其發病機制尚未明確,大多認為與血管因素、炎癥、纖維化因子、內分泌等有關[3]。既往研究發現凍結肩與2型糖尿病、甲狀腺疾病、腦卒中和自身免疫性疾病等多種疾病具有相關性[4]。因此,本研究探討凍結肩發病的危險因素,旨在為凍結肩的預防提供參考。
1""資料與方法
1.1""診斷、納入與排除標準
依據《骨科診療常規》[5]制定凍結肩的診斷標準:緩慢發病,持續性疼痛,夜間疼痛顯著,甚至影響睡眠或日常生活;表現為肩關節功能活動障礙、關節僵硬、肌肉萎縮和明顯壓痛;X線檢查無特殊影像學表現。納入標準:①年齡40~80歲;②病程≥3個月;③首次患病;④病史、查體、影像學資料完整。排除標準:①臨床資料不完整;②其他原因所致的肩部疼痛,包括肩關節骨折、脫位、化膿性關節炎、肩關節撞擊等;③患側肩關節周圍肌力≤4級;④預計生存期lt;3個月;⑤嚴重的肝、腎功能不全,惡性腫瘤終末期及嚴重感染病史。
1.2""研究對象及方法
選取2020年1月至2022年8月于浙江中醫藥大學附屬第一醫院住院的114例凍結肩患者納入病例組,病程3~12個月。簡單抽樣同時段與病例組年齡相差5歲以內、性別相同,數量1∶1匹配的于本院體檢的無凍結肩病史人群為對照組。收集兩組研究對象的臨床資料,包括性別、年齡及既往病史等。本研究經浙江中醫藥大學附屬第一醫院醫學倫理委員會審核批準(倫理審批號:2022-K-086-01)。
1.3""統計學方法
采用SPSS"26.0軟件進行數據統計分析。符合正態分布的計量資料以均數±標準差(
)表示,比較采用非參數檢驗;計數資料以例數(百分率)[n(%)]表示,比較采用χ2檢驗或Fisher確切概率法。采用多因素Logistic回歸分析探討凍結肩發病的危險因素。Plt;0.05為差異有統計學意義。
2""結果
2.1""兩組研究對象的一般資料比較
兩組研究對象的年齡、性別、體質量指數、高血壓、脂肪肝比較差異均無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05);兩組研究對象的神經根型頸椎病、2型糖尿病、肝炎、慢性非萎縮性胃炎、腰椎間盤突出癥、骨質疏松、甲狀腺結節病比較差異均有統計學意義(Plt;0.05),見表1。
2.2""單因素及多因素Logistic回歸分析
將上述有統計學意義的研究因素進行賦值,并進行多因素Logistic回歸分析,結果顯示神經根型頸椎病(OR=6.114,95%CI:1.458~25.642)和2型糖尿病(OR=24.069,95%CI:4.023~144.007)均是影響凍結肩發病的獨立危險因素,見表2、表3。
3""討論
近年來,國內外對凍結肩發病的危險因素開展大量研究,發現凍結肩與多種疾病有相關性[6-7]。高血壓、脂肪肝、骨質疏松等中老年人多發疾病與凍結肩發病高峰期一致,將多種可能影響凍結肩發病的因素納入多因素Logistic回歸分析后發現,2型糖尿病和神經根型頸椎病均是凍結肩發病的危險因素。
中國成人糖尿病患病率為11.2%,本研究中病例組患者2型糖尿病發病率為21.9%,對照組為2.6%,也證實患2型糖尿病與凍結肩的發生有明顯相關性[8-9]。既往研究顯示糖尿病患者中凍結肩的發病率高達10.8%~36.0%,是非糖尿病患者的3.69倍[10-11]。長時間處于高血糖狀態增加體內晚期糖基化終末產物(advanced"glycation"end"product,AGE),AGE可與肩袖、關節囊及其他結締組織中的膠原蛋白發生交聯,形成異常的膠原配置,改變結締組織的結構基質和力學性能,最終使肌腱、韌帶等組織強度減退、彈性下降,導致肩關節活動度明顯受限;另外,AGE也可與肌腱細胞、成纖維細胞上的受體作用,引發結締組織炎癥反應,從而誘發肩關節炎[12-13]。本研究結果顯示2型糖尿病是凍結肩發病的危險因素。合并糖尿病的凍結肩患者治療更為困難,其表現為疼痛減輕不明顯、療程較長、療效較差等,且對治療表現出耐藥性[14]。因此,在治療中積極控制血糖可降低凍結肩的發病率、縮短治療療程、提高治愈率。
神經根型頸椎病常與凍結肩相互影響,表現為頸肩疼痛伴上肢麻木及放射痛等;可出現臂叢牽拉試驗、頭部叩擊試驗及壓頸試驗陽性;受壓迫的神經根在其分布的區域出現感覺和腱反射異常等[15]。凍結肩患者肩關節周圍肌肉僵硬,可對頸椎產生一定牽拉,從而誘發神經根型頸椎病。同時,凍結肩也被認為是神經根型頸椎病的常見并發癥,其中一個主要原因是與支配肩關節及周圍組織、肌肉的神經受壓所導致的功能障礙有關。肩關節囊前部受肩胛下神經、胸外側神經和腋窩神經支配,關節囊后部受肩胛下神經和部分腋窩神經支配,相關的神經纖維來自C5和C6脊髓節段,傳遞疼痛的神經纖維主要來自脊髓后角的小肽神經元;肩關節周圍的組織和肌肉主要受C5~C8發出的神經支配,并在大腦皮層中樞的支配下使肩關節協調有序地運動,而這些神經恰好是神經根型頸椎病常見受累部位[16-18]。由此可見,神經根型頸椎病引起的神經功能障礙極有可能是凍結肩發病的病因。本研究結果顯示神經根型頸椎病是凍結肩發病的獨立危險因素。因此,積極治療頸椎病亦可有效地減輕凍結肩患者的癥狀,提高生活質量。
綜上所述,2型糖尿病和神經根型頸椎病與凍結肩顯著相關,是影響患者發病的獨立危險因素,因此,積極控制血糖、保護頸椎、降低神經根型頸椎病的發病可能成為今后凍結肩早期防治的一個靶點。
利益沖突:所有作者均聲明不存在利益沖突。
[參考文獻]
[1] BRECKENRIDGE"J"D,"MCAULEY"J"H,"GINN"K"A."Motor"imagery"performance"and"tactile"spatial"acuity:"Are"they"altered"in"people"with"frozen"shoulder?[J]."Int"J"Environ"Res"Public"Health,"2020,"17(20):"7464.
[2] LIU"M,"LIU"Y,"PENG"C,"et"al."Effects"of"massage"and"acupuncture"on"the"range"of"motion"and"daily"living"ability"of"patients"with"frozen"shoulder"complicated"with"cervical"spondylosis[J]."Am"J"Transl"Res,"2021,"13(4):"2804–2812.
[3] TANG"L,"CHEN"K,"MA"Y,"et"al."Scapular"stabilization"exercise"based"on"the"type"of"scapular"dyskinesis"versus"traditional"rehabilitation"training"in"the"treatment"of"periarthritis"of"the"shoulder:"Study"protocol"for"a"randomized"controlled"trial[J]."Trials,"2021,"22(1):"713.
[4] AKBAR"M,"MCLEAN"M,"GARCIA-MELCHOR"E,"et"al."Fibroblast"activation"and"inflammation"in"frozen"shoulder[J]."PLoS"One,"2019,"14(4):"e0215301.
[5] 邱貴興."骨科診療常規[M]."北京:"中國醫藥科技出版社,"2021.
[6] SELLEY"R"S,"JOHNSON"D"J,"NICOLAY"R"W,"et"al."Risk"factors"for"adhesive"capsulitis"requiring"shoulder"arthroscopy:"A"clinical"retrospective"case"series"study[J]."J"Orthop,"2019,"19:"14–16.
[7] DYER"B"P,"RATHOD-MISTRY"T,"BURTON"C,"et"al."Diabetes"as"a"risk"factor"for"the"onset"of"frozen"shoulder:"A"systematic"review"and"Meta-analysis[J]."BMJ"Open,"2023,"13(1):"e062377.
[8] BOUTEFNOUCHET"T,"JORDAN"R,"BHABRA"G,"et"al."Comparison"of"outcomes"following"arthroscopic"capsular"release"for"idiopathic,"diabetic"and"secondary"shoulder"adhesive"capsulitis:"A"systematic"review[J]."Orthop"Traumatol"Surg"Res,"2019,"105(5):"839–846.
[9] GENG"T,"ZHU"K,"LU"Q,"et"al."Healthy"lifestyle"behaviors,"mediating"biomarkers,"and"risk"of"microvascular"complications"among"individuals"with"type"2"diabetes:"A"cohort"study[J]."PLoS"Med,"2023,"20(1):"e1004135.
[10] EL"NAGGAR"T"E"D"M,"MAATY"A"I"E,"MOHAMED"A"E."Effectiveness"ofnbsp;radial"extracorporeal"shock-wave"therapy"versus"ultrasound-guided"low-dose"intra-articular"steroid"injection"in"improving"shoulder"pain,"function,"and"range"of"motion"in"diabetic"patients"with"shoulder"adhesive"capsulitis[J]."J"Shoulder"Elbow"Surg,"2020,"29(7):"1300–1309.
[11] SATPUTE"K,"REID"S,"MITCHELL"T,"et"al."Efficacy"of"mobilization"with"movement"(MWM)"for"shoulder"conditions:"A"systematic"review"and"Meta-analysis[J]."J"Man"Manip"Ther,"2022,"30(1):"13–32.
[12] DYER"B"P,"BURTON"C,"RATHOD-MISTRY"T,"et"al."Diabetes"as"a"prognostic"factor"in"frozen"shoulder:"A"systematic"review[J]."Arch"Rehabil"Res"Clin"Transl,"2021,"3(3):"100141.
[13] CHO"C"H,"JIN"H"J,"KIM"D"H."Comparison"of"clinical"outcomes"between"idiopathic"frozen"shoulder"and"diabetic"frozen"shoulder"after"a"single"ultrasound-guided"intra-articular"corticosteroid"injection[J]."Diagnostics"(Basel),"2020,"10(6):"370.
[14] SAITO"T,"SASANUMA"H,"IIJIMA"Y,"et"al."Prognostic"factors"of"shoulder"manipulation"under"ultrasound-guided"cervical"nerve"root"block"for"frozen"shoulder"for"patient"with"diabetes"mellitus:"A"retrospective"cohort"study[J]."Int"J"Surg"Case"Rep,"2021,"87:"106480.
[15] OSHINA"M,"YAMADA"T,"OHE"T."Atypical"cervical"radiculopathy"is"often"treated"as"a"different"disease"in"other"departments[J]."J"Spine"Surg,"2023,"9(3):"242–244.
[16] MERTENS"M"G,"MEERT"L,"STRUYF"F,"et"al."Exercise"therapy"is"effective"for"improvement"in"range"of"motion,"function,"and"pain"in"patients"with"frozen"shoulder:"A"systematic"review"and"Meta-analysis[J]."Arch"Phys"Med"Rehabil,"2022,"103(5):"998–1012.
[17] ALMASI"A,"JAFARI"S,"SOLOUKI"L,"et"al."The"best"surgical"treatment"for"cervical"radiculopathy:"A"systematic"review"and"network"Meta-analysis[J]."Adv"Biomed"Res,"2023,"12:"191.
[18] WANG"J,"SHU"B,"TANG"D"Z,"et"al."The"prevalence"of"osteoporosis"in"China,"a"community"based"cohort"study"of"osteoporosis[J]."Front"Public"Health,"2023,"11:"1084005.
(收稿日期:2024–01–09)
(修回日期:2024–03–06)