[摘要] 目的探討TNF-α和IL-6在重癥急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者血清中的變化及臨床意義。方法應(yīng)用ELISA法檢測32例重癥急性胰腺炎及25例對照組血清TNF-α、IL-6的水平變化。結(jié)果入院時(shí)SAP患者TNF-α水平(48.5±12.1)pg/mL顯著高于對照組(13.5±3.8)pg/mL,IL-6 水平SAP患者(66.7±19.3)pg/mL較對照組(42.3±14.2)pg/mL無明顯升高;SAP患者血清IL-6在入院的第7天升高最明顯(180.1±41.4)pg/mL,高于對照組,在入院第14天SAP患者血清TNF-α(29.5±9.5)pg/mL,IL-6 (102.8±24.6)pg/mL仍然高于對照組。結(jié)論檢測血清TNF-α和IL-6的水平變化,對重癥急性胰腺炎的早期診斷、病情判斷和預(yù)后評估具有重要的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 重癥急性胰腺炎;腫瘤壞死因子-α;白細(xì)胞介素-6
[中圖分類號] R576 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼] A[文章編號] 1673-9701(2009)34-04-02
Dynamic Changes and Clinical Significance of Serum TNF-α and IL-6 in Severe Acute Pancreatitis
CHAI HulinWANG DeqiangLIU Tiejun
General Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College,Baotou 014010,China
[Abstract] ObjectiveTo investigate the changes and clinical significance of serum TNF-α and IL-6 in severe acute pancreatitis(SAP). MethodsThe serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in 32 cases of SAP and 25 normal controls were determined by EL ISA. Results On admission, the serum TNF-α level of the SAP group(48.5±12.1pg/mL) was significantly higher than that of the control group(13.5±3.8pg/mL),while the serum IL-6 level of the SAP group(66.7±19.3pg/mL)showed no significant difference from that of the control group compared with the control group(42.3±14.2pg/mL). The serum IL-6 level of the SAP group(180.1±41.4pg/mL) was significantly higher than that of the control group on Day 7 after admission;the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the SAP group (29.5±9.5pg/mL) and (102.8±24.6pg/mL) were significantly higher than those of the control group but there was no significant difference between the SAP group and the control group on Day 14 after treatment. ConclusionThe determination of the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 may be of great value for early diagnosis,judgment of severity and prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis.
[Key words] Severe acute pancreatitis;Tumor necrosis factor-α;Interleukin-6
重癥急性胰腺炎(severe acute pancreatictis,SAP)是臨床常見的急腹癥,起病急,發(fā)病快,易引起全身多臟器功能損害,死亡率高[1,2]。人體在患SAP時(shí),整個(gè)機(jī)體處于高分解代謝的應(yīng)激狀態(tài),靜態(tài)能量需求增加,分解代謝大于合成代謝,免疫功能減退,腸道菌群移位,導(dǎo)致胰腺壞死組織感染,最終導(dǎo)致器官衰竭。近年來,隨著對SAP發(fā)病機(jī)制認(rèn)識的不斷深入,細(xì)胞因子在急性胰腺炎中的作用愈來愈受到人們的重視[3]。本研究測定了SAP患者血清中腫瘤壞死因子-α(TNF-α)、白細(xì)胞介素6(IL-6)含量,旨在探討它們在重癥急性胰腺炎患者血清中的變化情況,以及在診斷病情和預(yù)后判斷中的意義。
1 資料與方法
1.1臨床資料
本實(shí)驗(yàn)收集2007年1月~2009年2月包頭醫(yī)學(xué)院第一附屬醫(yī)院普外科、第二附屬醫(yī)院消化內(nèi)科SAP患者32例,男21例,女11例;年齡為35~68歲,平均年齡為48.13歲。均符合急性胰腺炎診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn);根據(jù)中華醫(yī)學(xué)會消化病學(xué)分會胰腺疾病學(xué)組制定的中國急性胰腺炎診治指南草案急性胰腺炎的診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為:臨床上表現(xiàn)為急性、持續(xù)性腹痛(偶無腹痛),血清淀粉酶活性增高≥正常值上限3倍,影像學(xué)提示胰腺有或無形態(tài)改變,排除其他疾病者,APACHEⅡ評分≥8分;Bathazar評分為D、E級。入選正常對照組25例,男16例,女9例;年齡為32~52歲,平均年齡為41.2歲。
1.2檢測方法
患者均于入院第1、3、7、14天分別抽取靜脈血3mL;對照組僅于檢查當(dāng)日空腹抽取一次靜脈血3mL。所有血標(biāo)本經(jīng)3000r/min離心10min,分離血清置-20℃保存待檢。檢測方法: TNF-α和IL-6均采用ELISA方法檢測,嚴(yán)格按試劑盒(深圳晶美生物有限公司)說明書進(jìn)行操作。
1.3統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理
所有數(shù)據(jù)用SPSS13.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件包進(jìn)行處理。計(jì)量資料以(χ±s)表示,組間比較采用t檢驗(yàn),以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2結(jié)果
2.1SAP 組血清TNF-α水平動(dòng)態(tài)變化
入院第1天水平較對照組明顯升高(P<0.05);TNF-α水平則持續(xù)升高,第3天達(dá)峰值,第14天雖然降至對照組水平,但是仍然高于對照組(P>0.05),見表1。
2.2IL-6水平動(dòng)態(tài)變化
入院第1天兩組患者血清IL-6水平與對照組比較無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);入院第7天兩組血清IL-6水平均顯著升高并達(dá)峰值,雖然分別于第14天降至對照組水平,但是仍然高于對照組(P>0.05)。見表1。
3討論
SAP是臨床上常見的急腹癥之一,其主要特征是胰腺局部炎癥和全身炎癥反應(yīng)[4],促炎性細(xì)胞因子在SAP發(fā)展過程中起重要作用,其中TNF-α和IL-6在胰腺炎癥早期階段即可大量釋放。當(dāng)患者合并嚴(yán)重感染出現(xiàn)內(nèi)毒素血癥時(shí),這些炎癥遞質(zhì)的釋放更為強(qiáng)烈,產(chǎn)生更為嚴(yán)重的局部及全身炎癥反應(yīng)和組織損傷,可使胰腺炎從水腫型向壞死型發(fā)展。因此,監(jiān)測血清中TNF-α和IL-6可以預(yù)測AP的嚴(yán)重程度,阻止炎癥的初始反應(yīng)可以減輕胰腺炎的病理變化[5]。另外,IL-6作為一種非常敏感的炎癥反應(yīng)標(biāo)志物,與傳統(tǒng)的炎癥指標(biāo)相比,IL-6有助于鑒別全身性感染和全身炎癥反應(yīng)綜合癥等病理狀態(tài)[6]。
TNF-α主要由活化的單核-巨噬細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生,是一種具有多種生物學(xué)效應(yīng)的生理炎性介質(zhì),可導(dǎo)致炎癥、細(xì)胞壞死等,適量的TNF-α對機(jī)體有保護(hù)作用,過量時(shí)則會對機(jī)體產(chǎn)生損傷,它除對血管內(nèi)皮細(xì)胞及炎性細(xì)胞具有直接的激活和毒性作用外,更主要的是誘導(dǎo)急性期蛋白的合成,催化和放大炎性反應(yīng),造成組織細(xì)胞的損害。本研究顯示,入院時(shí)SAP患者TNF-α水平顯著高于對照組水平,在第三天達(dá)到高峰,提示TNF-α水平升高較早,在SAP患者從輕型向重癥的發(fā)展過程中起核心用。IL-6主要由單核巨噬細(xì)胞和內(nèi)皮細(xì)胞分泌,是一種重要的急性反應(yīng)期炎癥介質(zhì)。血清IL-6的水平和持續(xù)時(shí)間可反映急性胰腺炎的嚴(yán)重程度[7],所以IL-6是早期預(yù)測SAP預(yù)后、評價(jià)炎癥嚴(yán)重程度的最有用的炎癥參數(shù)之一[8]。臨床研究顯示SAP患者血清IL-6水平明顯高于輕度患者,有并發(fā)癥的胰腺炎患者血中IL-6水平顯著高于無并發(fā)癥的患者[9]。本研究顯示,SAP血清IL-6在發(fā)病的第7天左右升高最明顯,高于對照組,在發(fā)病的第14天左右(進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的治療后,病情得到改善)SAP血清IL-6仍然高于對照組。提示IL-6既可作為急性胰腺炎早期診斷標(biāo)志物,也是判斷病情程度和評估預(yù)后重要指標(biāo)。綜上所述,聯(lián)合檢測SAP患者血清中TNF-α和IL-6的水平變化,對重癥急性胰腺炎的早期診斷、病情判斷和預(yù)后評估具有重要的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1] Wilmer A. ICU management of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Eur J Intern Med,2004,15(5):274-280.
[2] McKay CJ, Buter A. Natural history of organ failure in acute pancreatitis[J]. Pancreatology,2003,3(2):111-114.
[3] Pooran N, Indaram A, Singh P, et al. Cytokines(IL-6,IL-8,TNF):early and reliable predictors of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2003,37(3):263-266.
[4] 張新黎,張翼,錢民. TNF-α、IL-6和IL-8在重癥急性胰腺炎患者中的變化及臨床意義[J]. 中國普通外科雜志,2006,15(6):473-474.
[5] Xue DB,Zhang WH,Yun XG,et al. Regulating effects of arsenic trioxide on cell death pathways and inflammatory reactions of pancreatic acinar cells in rats[J]. Chin Med J (Engl),2007,120(8):690-695.
[6] Baumann B,Wagner M,Aleksic T,et al. Constitutive IKK2 activation inacinarcells is sufficient to induce pancreatitis in vivo[J]. J Clin Invest,2007,117(6):1502-1513.
[7] Ramudo L,Manso MA,Sevillano S,et al. Kinetic study of TNF-alpha production and its regulatory mechanisms in acinar cells during acute pancreatitis inducedby bile-pancreatic duct obstruction[J]. J Pathol,2005,206(1):9-16.
[8] Bhatia M, Neoptolemos JP, Slavin J. Inflammatory mediators as therapeutic targets in acute pancreatitis[J]. Curr Opin Investig Drugs,2001,2(4):496-501.
[9] Zhao YF, Zhai WL, Zhang SJ, et al. Protection effect of triptolide to liver injury in rats with severeacute pancreatitis[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int,2005,4(4):604-608.
(收稿日期:2009-07-31)