武凌寧

[摘要] 目的 對高齡患者心臟永久起搏器植入術的臨床效果展開研究分析。方法 整群選取86例2013年1月—2015年1月間在該院通過心臟永久起搏器植入術治療患者為研究對象,按照年齡分為治療組和對照組,均為43例,對比治療效果。結果 兩組患者心肌穿孔并發癥發生率、心室顫動并發癥發生率相比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);治療組患者心室起搏閾值和心房起搏閾值同對照組患者之間具有一定差異性,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 心臟永久起搏器植入術在治療高齡患者臨床上效果較為理想,但在患者圍術期應有效預防心室顫動和心肌穿孔等。
[關鍵詞] 高齡患者;心臟永久起搏器植入術;臨床效果
[中圖分類號] R54 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2015)05(a)-0052-02
To Evaluate the Clinical Effect of Elderly Patients with Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation
WU Ling-ning
Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Co of Daye General Hospital Department of Cardiology,Huangshi,Hubei Province,435005 China
[Abstract] Objective The clinical effects in elderly patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation expand research and analysis. Methods 86 patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation by patients, according to age into treatment group and control group were 43 cases, compared to the therapeutic effect. Results Between ventricular pacing in patients treated atrial pacing thresholds and thresholds with two groups of patients in the control group of patients the incidence of complications of myocardial perforation, ventricular fibrillation incidence of complications, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) have some differences, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation in the treatment of elderly patients with clinical effect is more ideal, but in patients with perioperative period should be effective in preventing ventricular fibrillation and cardiac perforation.
[Key words] Elderly patients; Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation; Clinical effect
隨著老齡化的到來,老年疾病發生率逐漸增加,緩慢型心律失常疾病發病率也逐漸上升,威脅患者健康和生命。心臟永久起搏器植入術為治療緩慢型心律失常的有效方法,在一定程度上改善患者臨床癥狀,改善患者預后[1]。同中青年患者相比,高齡患者機體功能和器官功能均顯著衰退,且多數高齡患者合并其疾病,使得術后出現多種并發癥,影響患者臨床治療效果[2]。為進一步了解高齡患者心臟永久起搏器植入術的臨床效果展開研究分析,該研究整群選取2013年1月—2015年1月間該院收治的86例通過心臟永久起搏器植入術治療患者為研究對象,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
整群選取該院86例通過心臟永久起搏器植入術治療患者,其中,治療組43例,患者年齡為80~92歲(86.35±3.58)歲;男30例,女13例;29例為病態竇房結綜合征,10例為房室傳導阻滯,4例并存病態竇房結綜合征和房室傳導阻滯;分析患者起搏器類型:6例為VVI,37例為DDD;對照組43例,患者年齡為41~79歲(60.28±10.05)歲;男31例,女12例;28例為病態竇房結綜合征,11例為房室傳導阻滯,4例并存病態竇房結綜合征和房室傳導阻滯;……