凡軍 曹麗萍

[摘要] 目的 探究帶鎖脛骨髓內(nèi)釘治療脛骨下1/3骨折的療效。 方法 選擇2012年2月—2014年2月期間該院收治的52例脛骨下1/3骨折患者,分為對照組26例行切開解剖復(fù)位普通鋼板固定治療,觀察組26例行帶鎖脛骨髓內(nèi)釘治療,觀察對比兩組臨床療效及并發(fā)癥情況。 結(jié)果 觀察組優(yōu)良率為96.2%,明顯高于對照組的76.9%,P<0.05;觀察組未見并發(fā)癥發(fā)生;對照組發(fā)生3例(11.5%)并發(fā)癥,P<0.05。 結(jié)論 帶鎖脛骨髓內(nèi)釘治療脛骨下1/3骨折的臨床療效確切,且并發(fā)癥少。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 帶鎖髓內(nèi)釘;脛骨下1/3骨折;骨折
[中圖分類號] R687.3 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-0742(2015)05(b)-0041-02
Observation on Effect of Interlocking Intramedullary Nail in Treatment of Tibial Fracture of Lower 1/3
FAN Jun1,CAO Li-ping2
1.Department of Orthopedics,Tinglin Hospital of Jinshan District,Shanghai,201505 China;2.Department of Surgery,Tinglin Hospital of Jinshan District,Shanghai,201505 China
[Abstract] Objective To probe into the effect of interlocking intramedullary nail in treatment of tibial fracture of lower 1/3. Methods 52 patients with tibial fracture of lower 1/3 admitted to our hospital between February 2012 and February 2014 were divided into two groups: control group(n=26) was given open reduction and anatomical plate internal fixation ,while observation group (n=26) was treated with interlocking intramedullary nail. The clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the groups. Results In the observation group, the excellent and good rate was 96.2%, significantly higher than that in the control group 76.9%(P<0.05);no complications were found in the observation group ,while 3 cases (11.5%) were found in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical curative effect of interlocking intramedullary nail in treatment of tibial fracture of lower 1/3 is exact and with fewer complications.
[Key words] Interlocking intramedullary nail; Tibial fracture of lower 1/3; Fracture
脛骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折是骨外科臨床常見多發(fā)癥之一,臨床常采用手術(shù)治療,但由于該癥獨(dú)特的解剖生理特征,致使手術(shù)方法一直存在爭議,若治療不當(dāng),常會引起骨折愈合不良、感染等諸多并發(fā)癥[1]。為此該研究將對2012年2月—2014年2月間該院收治的52例脛骨下1/3骨折患者進(jìn)行研究分析,分組分別采用切開解剖復(fù)位普通鋼板固定治療和帶鎖髓內(nèi)釘治療,其宗旨為臨床選擇更為安全、有效的手術(shù)方案,現(xiàn)報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
隨機(jī)選擇該院收治的52例脛骨下1/3骨折患者,其中男32例,女20例;年齡18~64歲,平均(41.3±2.4)歲;受傷原因:交通事故27例,高出墜落10例,重物砸傷8例,其他7例;開放型15例,閉合型37例;AO分型:A型18例,B型24例,C型10例。所以患者均經(jīng)X線檢查確診,排除病理性骨折、心肝腎嚴(yán)重功能障礙者。根據(jù)患者手術(shù)方案不同,分為觀察組和對照組各26例,兩組患者一般資料比較差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
對照組行切開解剖復(fù)位普通鋼板固定治療,硬膜外或全身麻醉滿意后,于脛骨外側(cè)骨折斷端作10~14 cm切口,逐層切開并分離至骨膜,顯露骨折端后,解剖復(fù)位,恢復(fù)下肢力線、長度、對位,再取合適長度的普通鋼板預(yù)彎后置于骨折端上下,常規(guī)鉆孔、螺釘固定、逐層關(guān)閉切口,術(shù)畢。……p>