區(qū)素寶
【摘要】目的:分析急診護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中救治效率的影響。方法:研究時(shí)間2021年1月—2022年12月,研究對(duì)象為本單位90例急性腦卒中患者,以入院時(shí)間先后次序分組,45例患者歸入對(duì)照組(落實(shí)常規(guī)流程急診護(hù)理模式),45例患者歸入觀察組(落實(shí)急診護(hù)理快速通道模式)。比較兩組護(hù)理效果。結(jié)果:觀察組患者等候救治時(shí)間為(17.58±1.09)min、短于對(duì)照組的(21.44±2.05)min,P<0.05;觀察組患者入院至確診時(shí)間為(15.30±1.10)min、短于對(duì)照組的(20.17±1.89)min,P<0.05;觀察組患者確診至治療時(shí)間為(20.47±1.20)min、短于對(duì)照組的(30.61±2.04)min,P<0.05;觀察組患者綠色通道停留時(shí)間為(49.75±3.56)min、短于對(duì)照組的(60.14±4.12)min,P<0.05。觀察組患者救治成功率為100.00%、致死率為0.00%、致殘率為4.44%,對(duì)照組患者救治成功率為88.89%、致死率為11.11%、致殘率為17.78%;觀察組患者救治成功率高于對(duì)照組,致死率和致殘率低于對(duì)照組,P<0.05。結(jié)論:急性腦卒中經(jīng)急診護(hù)理快速通道干預(yù)可保障救治效率,提高患者存活率。
【關(guān)鍵詞】急診護(hù)理快速通道;急性腦卒中;殘疾;死亡
Study on the effect of emergency nursing fast track on the treatment efficiency of acute stroke
QU Subao
Jiangmen Xinhui District People’s Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong 529100, China
【Abstract】Objective:To analyze the effect of emergency nursing fast track on the treatment efficiency of acute stroke.Methods:The study time was from January 2021 to December 2022,90 patients with acute stroke in our unit were the study subjects,they were divided into groups according to the order of admission time,45 patients were assigned to the control group (implementing routine emergency care mode),and 45 patients were assigned to the observation group (implementing emergency nursing fast track mode).The nursing effects of the two groups were compared.Results:The time of waiting for treatment in the observation group was (17.58 ± 1.09) min,which was shorter than (21.44 ± 2.05) min in the control group,P<0.05;The time from admission to diagnosis in the observation group was (15.30±1.10) min,which was shorter than (20.17 ± 1.89) min in the control group,P<0.05;The time from diagnosis to treatment in the observation group was (20.47 ± 1.20) min,which was shorter than (30.61±2.04) min in the control group,P<0.05;The time of green passage staying in the observation group was (49.75 ± 3.56) min,which was shorter than (60.14 ± 4.12) min in the control group,P<0.05.In the observation group,the success rate of treatment was 100.00%,the fatality rate was 0.00%,and the disability rate was 4.44%,while in the control group,the success rate of treatment was 88.89%,the fatality rate was 11.11%,and the disability rate was 17.78%;The success rate of treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the fatality rate and disability rate were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion:Emergency nursing fast track intervention for acute stroke can ensure treatment efficiency and improve patient survival rate.
【Key Words】Emergency nursing fast track; Acute stroke; Disability; Death
腦卒中是急性腦血管疾病,患者突發(fā)腦卒中后如果未獲得及時(shí)有效的救治,則可能延誤病情,影響疾病治療效果與預(yù)后,甚至最終導(dǎo)致死亡[1]。對(duì)于腦卒中患者而言,必須加強(qiáng)防控措施,早期發(fā)現(xiàn)與治療;而急診提供快速的搶救對(duì)急性腦卒中患者而言意義重大,也對(duì)醫(yī)院急診救治提出更高的要求[2-3]。本文研究急診護(hù)理快速通道模式的應(yīng)用效果,現(xiàn)作如下論述。
1.1 一般資料 對(duì)照組中男女比例31/14,平均年齡(50.9±7.4)歲,腦梗死28例、腦出血17例;觀察組中男女比例33/12,平均年齡(51.7±7.6)歲,腦梗死29例、腦出血16例。兩組性別、年齡、疾病類(lèi)型等一般資料對(duì)比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):首次發(fā)??;經(jīng)臨床影像學(xué)檢查確診;患者發(fā)病至就診時(shí)間均<6h;入院時(shí)的格拉斯哥評(píng)分≤12分。
排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):重要臟器功能障礙;顱腦外傷;認(rèn)知功能異常;精神異常。
1.2 方法

1.2.1 對(duì)照組應(yīng)用常規(guī)流程急診護(hù)理模式,急診護(hù)士按照規(guī)定進(jìn)行接診、掛號(hào)、分診、初步評(píng)估,配合救治,安排繳費(fèi),確診后轉(zhuǎn)入專(zhuān)科治療。
1.2.2 觀察組落實(shí)急診護(hù)理快速通道模式:1.急診科接到120通知后先在電話(huà)中詢(xún)問(wèn)患者的基本病情,期間與120救護(hù)車(chē)工作人員保持溝通,評(píng)估病情,做好搶救準(zhǔn)備,在綠色通道入口處安排接診人員等候,提前與相關(guān)科室溝通,預(yù)留檢查機(jī)會(huì)、參與搶救的人員。2.救護(hù)車(chē)隨車(chē)人員在接近回院的前10min內(nèi)觀察患者的體征指標(biāo)、肢體狀態(tài),給予生命支持護(hù)理,提前聯(lián)系急診做好調(diào)整工作。3.接診后15min內(nèi)安排影像學(xué)與心電圖檢查、各項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)室檢查,協(xié)調(diào)各科會(huì)診,制定救治方案。對(duì)符合溶栓與手術(shù)適應(yīng)證的患者,護(hù)士需在0.5h內(nèi)完成備皮、皮試、抽血、留置管道等準(zhǔn)備工作,立即安排轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn);遵守先搶救后掛號(hào)的原則。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo) 比較兩組救治時(shí)間,包括等候救治時(shí)間、入院至確診時(shí)間、確診至治療時(shí)間及綠色通道停留時(shí)間。比較兩組救治成功率、致死率和致殘率。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理 采用SPSS 22.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析。計(jì)數(shù)資料采用(%)表示,進(jìn)行x2檢驗(yàn),計(jì)量資料采用(x±s)表示,進(jìn)行t檢驗(yàn),P<0.05為差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 比較兩組救治時(shí)間 觀察組患者各項(xiàng)救治時(shí)間均短于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),如表1所示。
2.2 比較兩組救治成功率、致死率和致殘率 觀察組患者救治成功率高于對(duì)照組,致死率和致殘率低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),如表2所示。
急性腦卒中被臨床納入危急重癥,疾病特點(diǎn)是突然發(fā)病、損傷腦組織,會(huì)威脅患者生命安全,致殘率與死亡率較高,針對(duì)疾病的特殊性,臨床上需要注意搶救時(shí)效,以提升救治成功率[4-5]。
常規(guī)護(hù)理方式存在一定局限性,患者進(jìn)入急診科后各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)需要等候較長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,可能延誤最佳治療時(shí)間,易產(chǎn)生不良后果;臨床應(yīng)用急診護(hù)理快速通道的目標(biāo)是準(zhǔn)確快捷地救治患者,縮短轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)時(shí)間,具有較高的救治成功概率[6-7]。本次研究結(jié)果顯示,觀察組患者等候救治時(shí)間為(17.58±1.09) min、入院至確診時(shí)間為(15.30±1.10)min、確診至治療時(shí)間為(20.47±1.20)min、綠色通道停留時(shí)間為(49.75±3.56)min、對(duì)照組患者等候救治時(shí)間為(21.44±2.05)min、入院至確診時(shí)間為(20.17±1.89)min、確診至治療時(shí)間為(30.61±2.04)min、綠色通道停留時(shí)間為(60.14±4.12)min。觀察組患者各項(xiàng)救治時(shí)間均短于對(duì)照組,P<0.05。觀察組患者救治成功率為100.00%、致死率為0.00%、致殘率為4.44%;對(duì)照組患者救治成功率為88.89%、致死率為11.11%、致殘率為17.78%;觀察組患者救治成功率高于對(duì)照組,致死率與致殘率低于對(duì)照組,P<0.05。分析原因發(fā)現(xiàn),急診常規(guī)護(hù)理流程中各個(gè)科室均相對(duì)獨(dú)立,不能有效銜接疾病的各個(gè)救治環(huán)節(jié)[8]。急診護(hù)理快速通道指整合疾病救治中的各項(xiàng)獨(dú)立醫(yī)療措施,形成規(guī)范化的急診流程,具有高效率、全面性、有序性、合理性的特點(diǎn),可簡(jiǎn)化護(hù)理流程,加強(qiáng)各科室工作人員間的溝通,確??焖匍_(kāi)展醫(yī)療活動(dòng),縮短各流程用時(shí),爭(zhēng)取黃金搶救時(shí)間,提升疾病診療效率[9-10]。急診科協(xié)調(diào)好相關(guān)科室與不同工作人員之間的溝通配合,構(gòu)建快速方便、科學(xué)的護(hù)理通道會(huì)對(duì)疾病搶救效果形成正面影響,開(kāi)通急診護(hù)理快速通道可明顯縮短患者救治時(shí)間,最大化節(jié)約急救時(shí)間,充分考慮護(hù)理操作項(xiàng)目的先后順序,排除可能影響診療流程效率的障礙,簡(jiǎn)化護(hù)理流程,爭(zhēng)取寶貴的搶救時(shí)間,優(yōu)化搶救效果,降低死亡率與致殘風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[11-12]。
綜上所述,急性腦卒中經(jīng)急診護(hù)理快速通道干預(yù)可保障救治效率,提高患者存活率。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 鄧彩萍,錢(qián)桃,楊鳳華.“卒中120”快速評(píng)估結(jié)合卒中綠色通道時(shí)間節(jié)點(diǎn)控制表在急性缺血性腦卒中患者中的應(yīng)用效果[J].中西醫(yī)結(jié)合護(hù)理(中英文),2022,8(7):157-159.
[2] 張穎.急診護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中患者救治時(shí)間及效果的影響[J]. 中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師,2022,38(11):135-137.
[3] 鄭建濤,周嬋娟,許佳俊,等.優(yōu)化卒中急救流程對(duì)腦卒中治療及預(yù)后的影響[J].創(chuàng)傷與急診電子雜志,2022,10(2):73-79.
[4] HASSANKHANI H,SOHEILI A,VAHDATI S S.,et al.Treatment Delays for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in an Iranian Emergency Department:A Retrospective Chart Review[J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine,2019,73(2):118-129.
[5] 吳慶錕,陳勝棣,黃彩霞.急救護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中救治時(shí)間及治療效果的改善作用分析[J]. 中西醫(yī)結(jié)合心血管病電子雜志,2021,9(3):151-153.
[6] 萬(wàn)雪蓮,孫秀英,呂秋麗.急診快速通道下團(tuán)隊(duì)協(xié)作護(hù)理模式在急性腦卒中患者中的應(yīng)用[J].齊魯護(hù)理雜志,2021,27(17):122-125.
[7] 孫毅,慶萍萍.急診護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中患者救治時(shí)間及治療效果的影響[J].中西醫(yī)結(jié)合護(hù)理(中英文),2021,7(7):100-102.
[8] 林美玉.急診護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)縮短急性腦卒中救治時(shí)間的效果探討[J].心血管病防治知識(shí),2020,10(33):86-88.
[9] DAVIS N W.,BAILEY M,BUCHWALD N,et al.Factors that Influence Door-to-Needle Administration for Acute Stroke Patients in the Emergency Department[J].The Journal of neuroscience nursing:journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses,2021,53(3):134-139.
[10] 黃方.急診護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中救治時(shí)間及治療效果的影響效果分析[J].中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師,2020,36(32):144-145.
[11] 李文蘋(píng),王倩.急救護(hù)理快速通道對(duì)急性腦卒中患者救治時(shí)間與效果的影響[J].中外醫(yī)學(xué)研究,2020,18(18):80-82.
[12] 劉艷玲.急診護(hù)理快速通道在急性腦卒中患者中的應(yīng)用效果[J].中國(guó)民康醫(yī)學(xué),2020,32(4):150-151.