摘要:目的 探討收縮性心力衰竭和舒張性心力衰竭患者的臨床特征差異。方法 整理我院44例心力衰竭患者的臨床資料,按照患者的舒張性及收縮性心力衰竭差異分為DHF舒張組和SHF收縮組,每組22例,采用超聲心動圖對患者進行臨床檢查,觀察兩組患者的臨床新功能差異及臨床特征,并進行統計學分析。結果 SHF組的IVS、LVPW、LAD、EF要明顯低于DHF組,LVDd則高于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 舒張性與收縮性心力衰竭患者相比,其臨床特征可能舒張性心力衰竭患者的情況更佳嚴重,在臨床當中需要加強對患者的及時診斷和治療,降低患者可能出現的并發癥或是其他危險癥狀。
關鍵詞:舒張性;收縮性;心力衰竭;臨床特征;對比研究
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical features and the differences in systolic heart failure patients with diastolic heart failure.Methods The clinical data in our hospital of 44 patients with heart failure patients,according to the diastolic and systolic heart failure were divided into group SHF and group DHF systolic and diastolic,22 cases in each group,using ultrasonic Beckoning clinical examination of the patient chart,observation and clinical characteristics of clinical features between two groups of patients,and statistical analysis.Results In group SHF,IVS,LVPW,LAD,EF was lower than that in DHF group,LVDd was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);DHF FNS was higher than that of group SI-IF,TNF-2a,IL-6 than in the SHF group,with significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Diastolic in patients with systolic heart failure and serious situation better,improve the patient's attention,to reduce the complications of patients with possible or other dangerous symptoms.
Key words:Diastolic;Shrinkage;Heart failure;Clinical characteristics;Comparative study
在臨床心力衰竭中,舒張期心力衰竭和收縮期心力衰竭患者臨床癥狀相似,但是兩者的病因、發病機制以及治療等均存在一定的差異。本文選擇收縮期心力衰竭和舒張期心力衰竭患者各22例,對兩者的臨床特點進行分析,現報告如下。
1資料與方法
1.1一般資料 研究對象為本院的44例心力衰竭患者,舒張期心力衰竭(DHF)和收縮期心力衰竭(SHF)患者各22例,患者年齡42~74歲,全部患者經診斷符合慢性心力衰竭的診斷標準,心功能分級:Ⅱ級28例,Ⅲ級16例。合并高血壓11例,糖尿病4例。排除心絞痛、心梗死、差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。
1.2方法 超聲心動圖檢查應用飛利浦7500型超聲診斷儀,頻率為2~4MHz,測量患者的IVS(室間隔厚度)、LVPW(左室后壁厚度)、LAD(左房內徑)、左室EF、LVDd(左室舒張末期內徑)等,同時空腹胰島素(FNS)、腫瘤壞死因子2a(TNF-2a)、白介素6(IL-6)等。……