999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

Literature Review of “Voice” in Writing

2014-08-26 04:43:33孫婉秋
教育界·上旬 2014年8期

孫婉秋

【Abstract】Voice has been a key concept in the writing classes and it also has been an integral part of the various rubrics used for the evaluation of students writing in many Western countries, but in China it is still an unfamiliar concept. There are many studies on voice whose conclusions are inconsistent abroad, yet few studies in china. This paper, therefore, provides an overall literature review on voice, furthermore, discuses the implications of voices studies for chinas EFL writing instruction.

【Key words】voice?literature review?writing

1 Introduction

Voice is the authors ideas reflected from the writing. A writers voice is something uniquely their own. It's the way they write and is as natural as everyones speaking voice. Since 1980s, researchers have drawn their attentions to the concept of voice. Voice plays an important role in writing instruction and assessment.

2 Literature Review

2.1 Theoretical Definitions of Voice

Many composition researchers who are regarded as “Expressivists” see the concept of voice as being closely related to the Western ideology of individualism. Voice in a written text is regarded as “the expression of the essential individuality of a particular writer” (Stewart, 1992). Some researchers who are regarded as “Social Constructivists” think that voice and even languages are the production of social and cultural construction.

Based on all these insights, Matsuda (2001) presents a relatively more formal definition of voice: “voice is the amalgamative effect of the use of discursive and non-discursive features that language users choose, deliberately or otherwise, from socially available, yet ever changing repertoires” .

2.2 Empirical Studies on Voice

2.2.1 Descriptive Study on the Experience of Voice Building Experience in Writing

Among empirical studies on voice in writing, descriptive studies are in the majority. Hirvela and Belecher (2001),through depth interview, present and analyze all kinds of confusion and difficulties of three North American colleges and universities graduate encountered when the students in learning western academic writing, building academia personal voice which can be accepted by the western readers. They point out that these difficulties mainly come from identity conflict and cognitive barriers to their identity experienced in different social and cultural environment.

2.2.2 Analysis Studies on the Language Elements in the Process of Voice Building

These studies study voice building in writing through the analysis of the discourse of an individual or case studies. Ivanic and Camps (2001) analyses the writing of six graduate students studying in British universities and recommend that an L2 writing pedagogy that raises critical awareness about voice can help learners maintain control over the personal and cultural identity they are projecting in their writing. Matsuda (2001) studies web logs written in Japanese by a Japanese woman. He find that voice can be found in every language, even in languages associated with collective values.

2.2.3 Correlation Studies Between Intensity of Voice and Overall Writing Quality

Helms—Park and Stapleton(2003) examine the relationship between intensity of voice and overall writing quality in the context of undergraduate L2 argumentative writing. There is no significant association between the overall quality of writing and voice.

Matsuda and Tardy (2007) conducted a study to investigate whether and how voice plays a role in academic writing in the context of a simulated blind peer review of a manuscript submitted for publication in an academic journal in the field of rhetoric and composition studies. Contrary to Helms-Park and Stapletons (2003) conclusion, this study suggests that voice does play a role in academic writing. Zhao and Llosa (2008) builds on and extends the work of Helms-Park and Stapleton and examines a relationship in the context of an L1 high-stakes academic writing assessment. Results show a positive and significant relationship between voice intensity and writing quality. Zhao (2010) uses qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the definition of voice in second language argumentative writing, constructive elements and their relation with the quality of writing text. The results further verified the writing voice is an important factor in second language writing, thus strongly rejected Helms—Park and Stapletons research.

3 Implications of Voices Studies

Language teachers in China should help students strengthen reader awareness and author awareness in writing teaching, in addition to the traditional writing methods and skills, so that the students can show their voice in composition and build the author identity.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 毛片网站免费在线观看| 亚洲天堂网在线播放| 亚洲欧州色色免费AV| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影蜜月| 亚洲,国产,日韩,综合一区| 亚洲天堂伊人| 免费国产高清视频| 欧美另类第一页| 亚洲国产黄色| 国产性精品| 国产美女无遮挡免费视频网站| 久久精品国产999大香线焦| 久久婷婷六月| 亚洲色图综合在线| 亚洲天堂免费| 国产波多野结衣中文在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区图片| 国产精品欧美在线观看| 一级毛片免费高清视频| 久久久久久尹人网香蕉| 无码一区中文字幕| 免费国产小视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国偷自产在线91正片 | 久久久精品无码一区二区三区| av性天堂网| 欧洲极品无码一区二区三区| 麻豆精品在线视频| 国产一区二区三区精品欧美日韩| 亚洲性影院| 一级毛片在线免费视频| 久久中文字幕2021精品| 中文字幕调教一区二区视频| 9cao视频精品| 欧美亚洲欧美区| 国产chinese男男gay视频网| 四虎AV麻豆| 日韩人妻无码制服丝袜视频| 久久久久久午夜精品| 美女啪啪无遮挡| 女人一级毛片| 一本久道热中字伊人| a在线观看免费| 国产欧美在线| 伊人中文网| 伊人天堂网| 欧美精品1区2区| 国产精品毛片一区视频播| 97一区二区在线播放| 久久成人免费| 国产亚洲精品自在线| 91免费国产高清观看| 99人妻碰碰碰久久久久禁片| 在线免费不卡视频| 亚洲精品黄| 熟女日韩精品2区| 高清不卡毛片| 国产毛片基地| 国产精品福利一区二区久久| 久久国产高清视频| 色综合久久无码网| 亚洲免费福利视频| 亚洲性影院| 国产精品极品美女自在线| 国产精品欧美亚洲韩国日本不卡| 久久狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠97视色| 久久激情影院| 青青操视频在线| 国产女同自拍视频| 中文字幕人妻无码系列第三区| 青青热久麻豆精品视频在线观看| 人妻中文久热无码丝袜| 高清无码手机在线观看| 国产精品手机在线播放| 亚洲无码视频图片| 欧美色视频日本| 亚洲国产综合精品一区| 婷婷六月在线| 国产男人天堂| 国产99精品久久| 91在线视频福利| 国产农村妇女精品一二区| 欧美日本中文|