
摘要:目的 觀察帕瑞昔布鈉和哌替啶用于圍術(shù)期鎮(zhèn)痛的效果。方法 將我院下肢創(chuàng)傷患者83例隨機(jī)分為兩組,試驗(yàn)組41例采用帕瑞昔布鈉進(jìn)行圍術(shù)期鎮(zhèn)痛,對(duì)照組42例采用哌替啶進(jìn)行圍手術(shù)期鎮(zhèn)痛。在試驗(yàn)組術(shù)后即刻給予帕瑞昔布鈉40mg、在對(duì)照組術(shù)后即刻給予哌替啶50mg肌內(nèi)注射,進(jìn)行圍術(shù)期鎮(zhèn)痛,術(shù)后30min,以后每2h觀察1次至術(shù)后8h,兩組均在術(shù)后30min,2h,4h,6h,8h用VAS評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)疼痛程度。結(jié)果 兩組的VAS 評(píng)分在術(shù)后30min和8h具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P<0.05)。術(shù)后2h,4h,6h差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。結(jié)論 圍手術(shù)期術(shù)后使用帕瑞昔布鈉和哌替啶具有較強(qiáng)的鎮(zhèn)痛作用,但帕瑞昔布鈉作用起效時(shí)間較哌替啶長(zhǎng),但鎮(zhèn)痛持續(xù)效果較哌替啶略好。
關(guān)鍵詞:圍術(shù)期;鎮(zhèn)痛;帕瑞昔布鈉;哌替啶
The effect observation of perioperative analgesia using of parecoxib and Pethidine
Gong Li-ru ,Guo Jia
(The Zitong County People'S Hospital,Mianyang,622150,China)
Abstract:0bjective Observe the effect of parecoxib and Pethidine on perioperative analgesia . Methods 83 cases patients were randomly divided in to experimental group (41 cases ) and control group (42 cases) . Experimental group were given parecoxib 40 mg. Control group were given Pethidine 50 mg. VAS score was measured at 30min, 2, 4, 6,8 hours after surgery. Results VAS score after 30min and 8h of two groups was significant different(P<0.05) ,but there had no significant difference after 2,4,6,h(P>0.05) .Conclusion parecoxib and Pethidine have a strong analgesic effect for the perioperative analgesia . The onset time with parecoxib lasted longer, but the effect of pethidine slightly better.
Key words:Perioperation ;Analgesia ; Parecoxib ;Pethidine
術(shù)后疼痛已經(jīng)又越來越被人們重視,其影響患者的預(yù)后、康復(fù),是急需處理的主要問題之一; Apfelbanum[1]報(bào)道80%的患者在手術(shù)后至出院后 2w的時(shí)間內(nèi)存在不同程度的術(shù)后疼痛;有86%的患者為中到極重度疼痛。因此減輕疼痛,有助于消除患者的心理恐懼,減少圍手術(shù)期并發(fā)癥,包括深靜脈血栓形成以及肺部感染,褥瘡, 因此圍術(shù)期鎮(zhèn)痛十分必要。本文術(shù)后給予帕瑞昔布鈉和哌替啶進(jìn)行鎮(zhèn)痛,觀察療效以及差別, 總結(jié)如下: 圍手術(shù)期術(shù)后使用帕瑞昔布鈉和哌替啶具有較強(qiáng)的鎮(zhèn)痛作用,但帕瑞昔布鈉作用起效時(shí)間較哌替啶長(zhǎng),但鎮(zhèn)痛持續(xù)效果較哌替啶略好。
1資料與方法
1.1一般資料 2011年1月~9月共 83例需要進(jìn)行下肢創(chuàng)傷手術(shù)的患者參與了這項(xiàng)隨機(jī)單盲對(duì)照試驗(yàn)?!?br>