徐杰文
(廣東省廣州市番禺區中心醫院,廣東 廣州 511400)
阿替普酶靜脈溶栓治療急性缺血性腦卒中32例療效觀察
徐杰文
(廣東省廣州市番禺區中心醫院,廣東 廣州 511400)
目的探討阿替普酶靜脈溶栓治療急性缺血性腦卒中的療效和安全性。方法 選擇醫院2016年收治的急性缺血性腦卒中患者(治療時間窗在4.5 h內)64例,按用藥的不同分為兩組,各32例。治療組患者給予阿替普酶靜脈溶栓;對照組患者給予阿司匹林等常規治療。結果 治療組總有效率為93.75%,明顯高于對照組的81.25%(P<0.05);治療6 h,24 h,7 d后,治療組的美國國立衛生院卒中量表(NIHSS)評分分別為(11.8±3.1)分、(7.5±2.7)分、(5.6±4.5)分,明顯低于對照組的(13.5±2.9)分、(9.5±2.1)分、(7.8±3.6)分(P<0.05);兩組不良反應發生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 治療時間窗小于4.5 h時,阿替普酶靜脈溶栓治療急性缺血性腦卒中療效顯著,安全性好,值得臨床推廣。
阿替普酶;靜脈溶栓;急性缺血性腦卒中;安全性;臨床療效
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical effect and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for treating acute ischemic stroke.M ethods Totally 64 patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h in our hospital in 2016 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to the different medication,32 cases in each group.The treatment group received intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase,while the control group was given aspirin.Resu lts The total effective rate of the treatment group was 93.75%,which was significantly higher than 81.25% of the control group(P<0.05).After 6 h,24 h and 7 d of the treatment,the scores of NIHSS in the treatment group were(11.8±3.1)points,(7.5±2.7)points,(5.6±4.5)points,which were significantly lower than(13.5±2.9)points, (9.5±2.1)points,(7.8±3.6)points in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in adverse drug reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion At the time of therapeutic time window within 4.5 h,intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for treating acute ischemic stroke has good effect and safety,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Key words:alteplase;intravenous thrombolysis;acute ischemic stroke;safety;clinical effect
中國卒中學會科學聲明專家組最新發表聲明稱,目前,超早期內(治療時間窗小于4.5 h)使用重組組織型纖溶酶原激活劑(rt-PA)靜脈溶栓仍是急性缺血性腦卒中(AIS)最有效的藥物治療方案,可顯著改善預后,被國內外腦血管病指南一致推薦[1]。AIS常以起病急、進展快為特點,要求早期診斷、早期治療、早期康復、早期預防再發[2-3]。據研究,我國目前 AIS患者靜脈溶栓的治療率只有2.4%,而使用rt-PA進行靜脈溶栓的患者更少,其治療率只有1.6%。另外,美國心臟協會與卒中學會為了規范AIS的靜脈溶栓治療,提高溶栓率,于2016年2月聯合發布了rt-PA靜脈溶栓治療AIS的納入和排除標準的科學聲明。……