李清 羅向紅 高美玲 王賢裕
湖北醫(yī)藥學(xué)院附屬太和醫(yī)院麻醉科,湖北十堰442000
氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注對(duì)腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)的臨床研究
李清 羅向紅 高美玲 王賢裕▲
湖北醫(yī)藥學(xué)院附屬太和醫(yī)院麻醉科,湖北十堰442000
目的探討氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注對(duì)腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)。方法選擇臨床中型腦損傷患者適當(dāng)病例60例行顱內(nèi)血腫清除術(shù),隨機(jī)分二組,各20例。A組:對(duì)照組,圍術(shù)期未特殊處理;B組:圍術(shù)期氯胺酮/丙泊酚1:1混合0.5 mg/(kg·h)微泵持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注;C組:圍術(shù)期氯胺酮/丙泊酚1:1混合1 mg/(kg·h)微泵持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注。二組患者分別于手術(shù)開(kāi)始前和術(shù)畢12、24、48 h不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)取對(duì)側(cè)頸內(nèi)靜脈血5 mL,采用酶聯(lián)免疫法(ELISA)測(cè)定血清星狀細(xì)胞膠質(zhì)蛋白S-100β(S-100β蛋白)和神經(jīng)元性烯醇化酶(NSE)濃度,并記錄不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)各組患者神經(jīng)反射變化和意識(shí)恢復(fù)情況,6個(gè)月后隨訪60例患者并進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)短精神狀態(tài)檢查(MMSE)。結(jié)果與A組比較,B、C組隨時(shí)間延長(zhǎng)S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度顯著降低,差異有高度統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.01),其作用效應(yīng)有劑量依賴性。B組S-100β蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(2.26±0.52)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(1.25± 0.35)μg/L;C組S-100β蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(1.12±0.25)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(0.69±0.11)μg/L。B組NSE蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(7.26±1.12)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(5.36±0.58)μg/L;C組NSE蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(6.02±0.65)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(4.78±0.81)μg/L。與A組比較,B組和C組患者神經(jīng)反射和意識(shí)恢復(fù)快,腦神經(jīng)并發(fā)癥低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。B組意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間為(26.5±6.9)h,C組意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間(27.3±4.7)h;B組神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分為(12.8±1.9)分,C組神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分為(12.3±0.9)分。6個(gè)月后隨訪進(jìn)行MMSE評(píng)分,A組MMSE評(píng)分為(17.1± 3.2)分,低于B組[(23.7±4.5)分]和C組[(25.5±4.7)分](P<0.05),但B組和C組差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。手術(shù)結(jié)束24 h患者血清S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度越高對(duì)應(yīng)其6個(gè)月后隨訪MMSE評(píng)分就越低,血清S-100β蛋白與MMSE評(píng)分呈明顯負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.618,P<0.05)。結(jié)論氯胺酮和丙泊酚聯(lián)合應(yīng)用對(duì)腦損傷圍術(shù)期有明顯的治療和神經(jīng)保護(hù)作用,術(shù)后隨訪無(wú)不良反應(yīng)或副作用。
氯胺酮;丙泊酚;腦損傷;S-100β蛋白;NSE;MMSE
血清星狀細(xì)胞膠質(zhì)蛋白S-100β主要存在于中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)的神經(jīng)膠質(zhì)細(xì)胞,血清和腦脊液中S100β蛋白濃度變化可反映中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)損害程度,是評(píng)估和判斷神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)損傷特異性標(biāo)志物[1-2]。神經(jīng)元性烯醇化酶(NSE)是存在于神經(jīng)元,神經(jīng)元損傷時(shí)被釋放至腦脊液和血液中,腦脊液和血液中NSE的變化主要反映神經(jīng)元的損傷程度。丙泊酚和氯胺酮是臨床常用的靜脈全麻藥,研究表明丙泊酚可以抑制腦代謝和鈣離子內(nèi)流,減少興奮性氨基酸的毒性和自由基產(chǎn)生而達(dá)到保護(hù)腦作用[3-4];氯胺酮通過(guò)拮抗NMDA受體而阻斷與之相偶聯(lián)的Ca2+通道,降低谷氨酸的興奮性細(xì)胞毒性而減輕腦缺血或顱腦外傷后繼發(fā)性缺血缺氧性損害而發(fā)揮腦保護(hù)作用。本研究主要通過(guò)監(jiān)測(cè)血清S100β蛋白和NSE圍術(shù)期動(dòng)態(tài)變化,探討氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注對(duì)腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)。
1.1 一般資料
選擇湖北醫(yī)藥學(xué)院附屬太和醫(yī)院(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“我院”)2012年11月~2013年8月行開(kāi)顱血腫清除術(shù)的中型顱腦損傷患者60例,其中男41例,女19例,年齡26~53歲,體重48~72 kg,所有患者均經(jīng)CT檢查確診,排除既往有肝、腎、血液系統(tǒng)及其他可引起纖溶及凝血功能改變和術(shù)后無(wú)法進(jìn)行隨訪者。所有入組患者在研究過(guò)程中均接受常規(guī)治療,本研究均經(jīng)我院倫理委員會(huì)通過(guò),家屬均知情同意并簽署知情同意書。患者格拉斯哥昏迷評(píng)分(GCS評(píng)分)為9~13分,其中硬膜下血腫31例,硬膜外血腫19例(術(shù)中打開(kāi)硬膜檢查有無(wú)積血),腦挫裂傷伴腦內(nèi)血腫10例,隨機(jī)分為二組,每組20例。均在全麻下行開(kāi)顱血腫清除術(shù)。二組患者的年齡、性別、體重、術(shù)前GCS評(píng)分、顱腦損傷分型和類型比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性,見(jiàn)表1。
1.2 麻醉方法
患者入室后常規(guī)監(jiān)測(cè)無(wú)創(chuàng)血壓、心電圖、心率、脈搏血氧飽和度,并記錄其基礎(chǔ)值。誘導(dǎo)用藥:依次給予咪唑安定0.1 mg/kg、芬太尼5 μg/kg、維庫(kù)溴銨0.1 mg/kg、丙泊酚2 mg/kg行快速全麻誘導(dǎo)氣管插管,將60例患者隨機(jī)分為二組,每組20例,給予不同的藥物復(fù)合麻醉維持。A組(對(duì)照組),圍術(shù)期未特殊處理;B組:圍術(shù)期氯胺酮/丙泊酚1:1混合0.5 mg/(kg·h)微泵持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注;C組:圍術(shù)期氯胺酮/丙泊酚1:1混合1 mg/(kg·h)微泵持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注。術(shù)中二組患者均吸入1.5~2.0 vol%七氟烷并根據(jù)手術(shù)時(shí)間追加芬太尼及維庫(kù)溴銨以維持肌松和麻醉深度。手術(shù)結(jié)束時(shí)停藥,自主呼吸完全恢復(fù)后帶氣管導(dǎo)管送重癥監(jiān)護(hù)病房(ICU),吸氧并進(jìn)行常規(guī)監(jiān)測(cè)對(duì)癥治療。

表1 三組一般資料比較(n=20)
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
二組患者于手術(shù)開(kāi)始前和術(shù)畢12、24、48 h不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)取各組取對(duì)側(cè)頸內(nèi)靜脈血5 mL,采用酶聯(lián)免疫法測(cè)定S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度,并記錄不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)各組患者神經(jīng)反射變化和意識(shí)恢復(fù)情況。術(shù)后6個(gè)月隨訪按簡(jiǎn)短精神狀態(tài)檢查(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)量表指標(biāo)對(duì)患者的計(jì)算、邏輯思維能力、記憶及空間感知等進(jìn)行評(píng)分。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS 15.0軟件分析。計(jì)量資料采用方差分析,兩兩比較采用LSD-t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用χ2檢驗(yàn)和直線性相關(guān)分析。以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
與A組比較,B、C組隨時(shí)間延長(zhǎng)S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度顯著降低,差異有高度統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.01),其作用效應(yīng)有劑量依賴性,B組S-100β蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(2.26±0.52)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(1.25± 0.35)μg/L;C組S-100β蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(1.12± 0.25)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(0.69±0.11)μg/L。B組NSE蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(7.26±1.12)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(5.36±0.58)μg/L;C組NSE蛋白濃度術(shù)畢24 h為(6.02±0.65)μg/L,術(shù)畢48 h為(4.78±0.81)μg/L。具體結(jié)果見(jiàn)表2、3。與A組比較,B組和C組患者神經(jīng)反射和意識(shí)恢復(fù)快,腦神經(jīng)并發(fā)癥低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間B組[(26.5±6.9)h]和C組[(27.3±4.7)h]短于A組[(36.9±5.5)h],術(shù)后48 h神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分B組[(12.8±1.9)h]和C組[(12.3±0.9)h]低于A組[(19.4±1.8)h],見(jiàn)表4。6個(gè)月后隨訪進(jìn)行MMSE評(píng)分,A組MMSE評(píng)分[(17.1±3.2)分]低于B組[(23.7± 4.5)分]和C組[(25.5±4.7)分](P<0.05),但B組和C組差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。手術(shù)結(jié)束24 h患者血清S100β蛋白和NSE濃度越高對(duì)應(yīng)其6個(gè)月后隨訪MMSE評(píng)分就越低,血清S100β蛋白與MMSE評(píng)分呈明顯負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.618,P<0.05)。
表2 三組不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)S-100β蛋白濃度變化(μg/L,±s,n=20)

表2 三組不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)S-100β蛋白濃度變化(μg/L,±s,n=20)
注:與A組比較,*P<0.01;與B組比較,#P<0.01
組別術(shù)前術(shù)畢1 2 h術(shù)畢2 4 h術(shù)畢4 8 h A組B組C組6 . 4 9 ± 1 . 0 5 6 . 6 2 ± 0 . 9 1 6 . 5 5 ± 1 . 0 7 7 . 4 1 ± 1 . 0 8 3 . 8 5 ± 0 . 8 6*2 . 3 9 ± 0 . 6 3*#5 . 8 5 ± 0 . 8 3 2 . 2 6 ± 0 . 5 2*1 . 1 2 ± 0 . 2 5*#2 . 8 7 ± 0 . 6 8 1 . 2 5 ± 0 . 3 5*0 . 6 9 ± 0 . 1 1*#

表3 三組不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)NSE濃度變化(μg/L,x±s,n=20)
表4 三組意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后48 h神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分及6個(gè)月后MMSE評(píng)分比較s,n=20)

表4 三組意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后48 h神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分及6個(gè)月后MMSE評(píng)分比較s,n=20)
注:與A組比較,△P<0.05;MMSE:簡(jiǎn)短精神狀態(tài)檢查
組別意識(shí)恢復(fù)時(shí)間(h)神經(jīng)功能缺損評(píng)分(分)M M S E評(píng)分(分)A組B組C組3 6 . 9 ± 5 . 5 2 6 . 5 ± 6 . 9△2 7 . 3 ± 4 . 7△1 9 . 4 ± 1 . 8 1 2 . 8 ± 1 . 9△1 2 . 3 ± 0 . 9△1 7 . 1 ± 3 . 2 2 3 . 7 ± 4 . 5△2 5 . 5 ± 4 . 7△
腦損傷患者均繼發(fā)性引起腦缺氧缺血而導(dǎo)致腦損害進(jìn)一步加重,開(kāi)顱手術(shù)可降低顱內(nèi)壓、清除顱內(nèi)血腫及壞死腦組織,但顱腦手術(shù)本身對(duì)于患者腦組織也是一個(gè)損傷應(yīng)激過(guò)程[5]。因此腦功能保護(hù)是神經(jīng)外科麻醉中重要的組成部分。近年來(lái)氯胺酮和丙泊酚的圍術(shù)期腦保護(hù)作用受到越來(lái)越多的關(guān)注。NSE是存在于神經(jīng)元的糖酵解途徑關(guān)鍵酶,神經(jīng)元損傷時(shí)被釋放至腦脊液和血液中,腦脊液和血液中NSE的變化主要反映神經(jīng)元的損傷程度,而神經(jīng)膠質(zhì)細(xì)胞的損傷對(duì)其影響甚微[6]。S-100β蛋白主要存在于神經(jīng)膠質(zhì)細(xì)胞和雪旺細(xì)胞中,正常成人血清中檢測(cè)不到S-100β蛋白的存在,當(dāng)腦細(xì)胞損傷時(shí)(腦外傷、蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血、腦卒中及體外循環(huán)等),S-100β蛋白被釋放至腦脊液和血液中,導(dǎo)致血清及腦脊液中S-100β蛋白濃度升高,超過(guò)0.5 μg/L時(shí)即有病理意義,它主要反映神經(jīng)膠質(zhì)細(xì)胞的損傷程度[7]。S-100β蛋白是腦損傷的特異性指標(biāo),也可用來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)各種腦保護(hù)措施的效果[8-10]。本研究通過(guò)檢測(cè)顱腦損傷患者血清中S-100β蛋白和NSE含量變化及患者術(shù)后6個(gè)月MMSE評(píng)分來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注對(duì)腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期的腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)。
腦損傷患者腦缺血再灌注損傷的發(fā)病機(jī)制復(fù)雜,主要涉及興奮性氨基酸毒性、細(xì)胞胞內(nèi)鈣離子超載、氧自由基大量產(chǎn)生、蛋白激酶和磷酸化酶改變及線粒體功能障礙等引起的一系列級(jí)聯(lián)反應(yīng)導(dǎo)致細(xì)胞功能和結(jié)構(gòu)改變,參與細(xì)胞不可逆性損傷過(guò)程[11]。谷氨酸是這些級(jí)聯(lián)反應(yīng)的重要啟動(dòng)因子之一,在谷氨酸誘導(dǎo)的多途徑級(jí)聯(lián)反應(yīng)中,NMDA受體過(guò)度被激活起著重要的作用[12]。臨床上常用的靜脈麻醉藥氯氨酮與丙泊酚均是NMDA受體直接或間接非競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性拮抗劑,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)氯胺酮和丙泊酚均具有抑制興奮性氨基酸產(chǎn)生和釋放的保護(hù)作用,降低大鼠腦內(nèi)天冬氨酸、谷氨酸及甘氨酸二種興奮性氨基酸含量,抑制鈣離子內(nèi)流,影響Na+-K+-ATPase活性,促進(jìn)線粒體能量代謝恢復(fù),從而減輕神經(jīng)細(xì)胞急性水腫壞死[13-14]。臨床研究表明,在腦外傷手術(shù)中丙泊酚和氯胺酮靜脈復(fù)合麻醉不升高ICP,同時(shí)對(duì)腦代謝有明顯抑制作用[15]。腦缺血再灌注損傷引起能量代謝障礙、氨基酸釋放等一系列生化級(jí)聯(lián)反應(yīng)在缺血后數(shù)秒或數(shù)分鐘內(nèi)即開(kāi)始,氧自由基在再灌注后爆發(fā)形成。氯胺酮對(duì)腦缺血再灌注損傷的防治機(jī)制是與NMDA受體通道復(fù)合物的苯環(huán)已哌啶調(diào)節(jié)位點(diǎn)(PCP)結(jié)合而阻斷NMDA受體反應(yīng),減少NMDA受體介導(dǎo)的Ca2+內(nèi)流從而抑制了細(xì)胞內(nèi)Ca2+超載,并抑制缺血ATP快速耗竭,維持線粒體膜的穩(wěn)定,顯著減輕NMDA受體過(guò)度激活所致的氧自由基損傷[11,16]。丙泊酚腦保護(hù)作用機(jī)制是與GBAAA受體的BD識(shí)別位點(diǎn)結(jié)合,激動(dòng)GABAA受體產(chǎn)生抑制性突觸后電流抑制Glu受體激活,使突觸后膜超極化,減少興奮性氨基酸釋放,并間接抑制NMDA受體的激活,從而減輕腦缺血缺氧性損傷[12,17],其腦保護(hù)作用包括:①清除自由基抑制脂質(zhì)過(guò)氧化作用;②顯著降低腦葡萄糖代謝和氧代謝率;③抑制興奮性氨基酸的產(chǎn)生和釋放;④降低顱內(nèi)壓。本研究基于氯胺酮和丙泊酚各自的藥理特性,將二者聯(lián)合應(yīng)用于顱腦手術(shù),取長(zhǎng)補(bǔ)短優(yōu)勢(shì)互補(bǔ),發(fā)揮更強(qiáng)的腦保護(hù)效應(yīng),本研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),圍術(shù)期氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注能顯著降低腦損傷患者血清S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度,其作用效應(yīng)有劑量依賴性,且患者神經(jīng)反射和意識(shí)恢復(fù)快,腦神經(jīng)并發(fā)癥較對(duì)照組低。表明氯胺酮和丙泊酚聯(lián)合微泵持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸入對(duì)顱腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期有顯著的腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)。
顱腦損傷患者常伴有中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)性后遺癥,腦缺血缺氧嚴(yán)重程度與其認(rèn)知功能障礙嚴(yán)重程度呈正相關(guān),輕度腦損害患者的認(rèn)知功能障礙是一過(guò)性的,且在術(shù)后1周內(nèi)就很快恢復(fù),中重度腦外傷患者則直到術(shù)后半年仍有認(rèn)知功能障礙存在[18-19],而CT結(jié)果和中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)臨床表現(xiàn)不能很好評(píng)價(jià)這種長(zhǎng)期神經(jīng)功能異常。目前常用MMSE量表作為顱腦損傷患者的認(rèn)知能力和智力障礙程度評(píng)價(jià)量表,其使用方便客觀,可較全面評(píng)價(jià)患者手術(shù)及術(shù)后康復(fù)療效[20]。近年來(lái)NSE和S-100β蛋白作為顱腦損傷的生化學(xué)檢測(cè)指標(biāo),在神經(jīng)損傷的實(shí)驗(yàn)和臨床方面引起了很大的關(guān)注。系列實(shí)驗(yàn)表明血清S-100β濃度腦損傷患者的特異性指標(biāo)可準(zhǔn)確預(yù)示其認(rèn)知功能障礙的嚴(yán)重程度,也可用來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)各種腦保護(hù)措施的效果[21]。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),手術(shù)結(jié)束24 h患者血清S-100β蛋白和NSE濃度越高對(duì)應(yīng)其6個(gè)月后隨訪MMSE評(píng)分就越低,血清S-100β蛋白與MMSE評(píng)分呈明顯負(fù)相關(guān),表明通過(guò)檢測(cè)顱腦損傷患者血清中S-100β蛋白和NSE含量變化及患者術(shù)后6個(gè)月MMSE評(píng)分可準(zhǔn)確評(píng)價(jià)氯胺酮和丙泊酚持續(xù)頸內(nèi)靜脈輸注對(duì)腦損傷患者圍術(shù)期的腦保護(hù)效應(yīng)。
[1]AliM S,Harmer M,Vaughan R.Serum S100 protein as a marker of cerebral damage during cardiac surgery[J].Br J Anaesth,2000,85(2):287-298.
[2]Reinsfelt B,Westerlind A,Ioanes D,et al.Transcranial Doppler microembolic signals and serum marker evidence of brain injury during transcatheter aortic valve implantation[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2012,56(2):240-247.
[3]金建華,周守靜.丙泊酚對(duì)顱腦手術(shù)患者血清SOD和MDA的影響[J].中國(guó)臨床醫(yī)學(xué),2006,13(5):827-828.
[4]吳蔚宇,梁昌毅,高天華.靜脈全憑丙泊酚誘導(dǎo)對(duì)體內(nèi)一氧化氮含量及血壓的影響[J].中國(guó)臨床醫(yī)學(xué),2002,9(2):129-130.
[5]Moustafa RR,Moneim AA,Salem HH,et al.Intracranial steno-occlusive arterial disease and its associations in E-gyptian ischemic stroke patients[J].Stroke,2013,44(2):538-541.
[6]Groom RC,Quinn RD,Lennon P,et al.Microemboli from cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with a serum marker of brain injury[J].J Extra Corpor Technol,2010,42(1):40-44.
[7]ParolariA,AlamanniF,NaliatoM,etal.Adultcardiacsurgery out comes:role of the pumptype[J].Eur J Cardiothoral Surg,2000,18(5):575-582.
[8]Tamura A,Imamaki M,Shimura H,et al.Release of serum S-100β protein and neuron-specific enolase after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without intracranial and cervical artery stenosis[J].Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2011,17(1):33-38.
[9]Johnsson P,Lundqvist C,Lindgren A,et al.Cerebral complicationsafter cardiac surgery assessed by S100 protein and NSE levels inblood[J].J Cardiothorac Vese Anesth,1995,9:694-699.
[10]Georgiadis D,Berger A,Kowatschev E,et al.Pedictive value of S100beta and neuron-specific enolase serum levels for adverse neurologic outcome after cardiac surgery[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2000,119(1):138-147.
[11]Engelhard K,Werner C,Eberspacher E,et al.The effect of the alpha 2-agonist dexmedetomidine and the Nmethyl-D-aspartate antagonist S(+)-ketamine on the expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins after incomplete cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats[J].Anesth Analg,2003,96(2):524-531.
[12]Gelb AW,Bayona NA,Wilson JX,et al.Propofol anesthesia compared to awake reduces infarct size in rats[J]. Anesthesiology,2002,96(5):1183-1190.
[13]丁細(xì)桃.氯胺酮對(duì)小鼠短暫性局灶性腦缺血再灌注損傷的影響[J].溫州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2004,34(4):266-267.
[14]王濤,劉曉媛,趙繼宗,等.丙泊酚對(duì)全腦缺血再灌注損傷大鼠的腦保護(hù)作用及其機(jī)制研究[J].中國(guó)康復(fù)理論與實(shí)踐,2004,10(8):65-67.
[15]Tai KK,Blondelle SE,Ostresh JM,et al.An N-methyl-D-as partate receptor channel blocker with neuroprotective activity[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2001,98(6):3519-3524.
[16]Shibuta S,Varathan S,Mashimo T.Ketamine and thiopental sodium:individual and combined neuroprotective effects on cortical cultures exposed to NMDA or nitricoxide[J].Br J Anaesth,2006,97(4):517-524.
[17]SagaraY,HendlerS,Khoh-ReiterS,etal.Propofolhemisuccinate protects neuronal cells from oxidative injury[J].J Neurochem,1999,73(6):2524-2530.
[18]Whitaker DC,Green AJ,Stygall J,et al.Evaluation of an alternative S100b assay for use in cardiac surgery:relationship with microemboli and neuropsychological outcome[J].Perfusion,2007,22(4):267-272.
[19]Max JE.The phenomenology of personality change due to traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents[J].J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci,2001,13(1):161-163.
[20]Juva K,Verkkoniemi A,Viramo P,et al.APOE epsilon4 dose not predict mortality,cognitive decline or dementia in the oldest old[J].Neurology,2000,54(2):412-415.
[21]Yoda M,Nonoyama M,Shimakura T.Cerebral perfusion during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Surg Today,2004,34(6):501-505.
Clinical research of Ketamine and Propofol internal carotid vein continuous infusion on brain protective effect in patients with craniocerebral injury during perioperative period
LI QingLUO XianghongGAO MeilingWANG Xianyu
Objective To investigate Ketamine and Propofol internal carotid vein continuous infusion on brain protective effect in patients with craniocerebral injury during perioperative period.Methods Clinical 60 patients with medium craniocerebral injury were randomly divided into 3 groups,with 20 cases in each group.Group A:control group,without any special treatments;group B:mixture of Ketamine and Propofol by 1∶1 were pumped to the carotid vein by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/(kg·h)in perioperative;group C:mixture of Ketamine and Propofol by 1∶1 were pumped to the carotid vein by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/(kg·h)in perioperative.5 mL blood samples were taken at initiation of the surgery,12 h,24 h and 48 h after operation from contralateral carotid vein of the three groups.Concentration of both S-100β and NSE in serum of patients was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).And reflex changes and recovery of consciousness of patients in each group at different time points were recorded.60 patients were followed up six months later and the minimental state examination(MMSE)was performed andrecorded.Results Compared with group A,S-100β protein and NSE were significantly lower(P<0.01)in group B and C with time,with role in a dose-dependent effect,and patients recover faster reflex and consciousness,while lower cranial nerve complications than the control group.The S-100β levels in group B after operation 24 h and 48 h were (2.26±0.52)μg/L and(1.25±0.35)μg/L,the S-100β levels in group C after operation 24 h and 48 h were(1.12±0.25) μg/L and(0.69±0.11)μg/L respectively.The NSE levels in group B after operation 24 h and 48 h were(7.26±1.12)μg/L and(5.36±0.58)μg/L,the NSE levels in group C after operation 24 h and 48 h were(6.02±0.65)μg/L and(4.78±0.81) μg/L respectively.The consciousness recover time in group B and C were(26.5±6.9)h and(27.3±4.7)h,the clinical neurological functional deficiency score(CNFDS)in group B and C were(12.8±1.9)points and(12.3±0.9)points respectively.The MMSE score after 6 months follow-up visits in group B[(23.7±4.5)points]and group C[(25.5±4.7) points]were higher than that in control group[(17.1±3.2)points](P<0.05).There was negative association between S100β in serum and MMSE score(r=-0.618,P<0.05).Conclusion The application of Ketamine and Propofol has significant therapeutic and neuroprotective effects during cerebral surgery,with no adverse reactions or side effects after postoperative follow-up visits.
Ketamine;Propofol;Craniocerebral injury;S-100β protein;NSE;MMSE
R742.3
A
1673-7210(2014)02(b)-0085-05
2013-10-12本文編輯:張瑜杰)
湖北省十堰市第二批科技攻關(guān)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目。
李清(1973-),男,湖北房縣人,醫(yī)學(xué)博士,副教授,碩士生導(dǎo)師;研究方向:圍術(shù)期腦保護(hù)。
▲通訊作者
Department of Anesthesiology,Taihe Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical University,Hubei Province,Shiyan442000, China▲