夏靜波
[摘要] 目的 分析精細化管理在新生兒科中的應用。方法 選取2016年9月—2018年10月該院收治的新生兒154例為研究對象,依據時間前后,2016年9月—2017年8月收治患兒為對照組77例,主要為常規性管理,2017年9月—2018年10月收治患兒為觀察組77例進行精細化管理,對比不同管理方式下臨床效果。結果 觀察組業務考核、護理記錄等質量評分明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組住院環境、服務態度以及知識教育等護理滿意度明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 為新生兒進行精細化管理可有效提升護理質量和護理滿意度,有臨床應用價值。
[關鍵詞] 精細化管理;新生兒科;護理管理;護理質量
[中圖分類號] R473 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1672-5654(2020)02(a)-0021-03
Application of Refined Management in Neonatal Department
XIA Jing-bo
Department of Pediatrics, Liaoyuan Women and Infant Hospital, Liaoyuan, Jilin Province, 136200 China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the application of refined management in neonatal department. Methods A total of 154 neonates admitted in the hospital from September 2016 to October 2018 were selected as the research subjects. According to the time before and after, the children admitted from September 2016 to August 2017 were the control group of 77 cases, mainly for routine management. From September 2017 to October 2018, 77 patients were treated in the observation group for refined management, and the clinical effects of different management methods were compared. Results The quality scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The hospitalization environment, service attitude, and knowledge education in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Fine management of newborns can effectively improve the quality of care and satisfaction of nursing, and has clinical application value.
[Key words] Refined management; Neonatal department; Nursing management; Quality of care
隨著現代化健康觀念、醫學模式轉變,護理工作逐步由疾病為中心轉變為疾病患兒為中心。兒科護理工作由于自身特殊性,有風險高和壓力大的特點。同時由于患兒好動且依從性較差,因此也會增加意外受傷風險。臨床護理風險可能造成患兒出現意外,加重病情。為提升護理質量,有分析提出精細化管理,此種管理方式立足于護理管理實際,對常規性管理方式進行優化,確保管理方式和工作實際相結合[1],因此認為此種管理方式可有效提升護理質量,控制護理風險。現選取該院2016年9月—2018年10月154例患兒為研究對象,主要分析各種護理管理方式的效果,報道如下。
1? 資料與方法
1.1? 一般資料
選取該院兒科收治的154例患兒為研究對象,對照組77例,男37例,女40例;年齡1~5歲,平均年齡(3.06±0.63)歲。觀察組77例,男38例,女39例;年齡0.9~5歲,平均年齡(3.10±0.54)歲。患兒基礎性數據,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),可進行對比分析。
1.2? 方法
對照組主要為常規性管理,其中由護士長組織晨會、晚總結,對常見問題進行分析,提出改進措施。護……