王紅
【摘 要】目的:對比ICU重癥患者采取常規護理和預見性護理的效果。方法:在2015年3月到2017年2月期間來我院就診的ICU重癥患者中選取64例參與本組研究,按照計算機表法將其均分2組,各32例。對參照組行常規護理干預,對實驗組行預見性護理干預。分析64例ICU重癥患者的住院時間、感染情況、護理滿意度、SDS和SAS評分。結果:與實驗組相比,參照組SDS和SAS評分較高、護理滿意度較低、感染情況較高、住院時間較長,組間數據對比存在統計學意義(p<0.05)。結論:對ICU重癥患者予以預見性護理的效果優于行常規護理的效果,控制感染情況發生,緩解患者的不良情緒,提高對護理工作的滿意度。
【關鍵詞】預見性護理;常規護理;ICU重癥
Abstract Objective: To compare the effect of conventional and foreseeable nursing in ICU severe patients. Methods: from March 2015 to February 2017, 64 patients with severe ICU were enrolled in the study. They were equally divided into 2 groups according to the computer table method, 32 cases in each group. The routine nursing intervention was carried out in the reference group and the experimental group was treated with foreseeable nursing intervention. The time of hospitalization, infection, nursing satisfaction, SDS and SAS score in 64 cases of severe ICU patients were analyzed. Results: compared with the experimental group, the SDS and SAS scores of the reference group were higher, the nursing satisfaction was lower, the infection rate was higher, and the length of hospitalization was longer. The data comparison between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion: the effect of predictive nursing for patients with severe ICU is better than that of routine nursing, controlling infection, relieving patients' bad mood and improving their satisfaction with nursing work.
Key words: foreseeable nursing; routine nursing; ICU critical care
【中圖分類號】R471 【文獻標識碼】A 【文章編號】1672-3783(2018)05-03--01
ICU為重癥監護病房,重癥患者具有發展迅速、病情重以及易感染的特點,因此對病房環境具有較高的要求,如護理不當患者會發生并發癥,對治療效果造成嚴重影響[1]。經相關研究顯示,實施常規護理對并發癥的預防效果不佳,因此需采取預見性護理干預。現對ICU重癥患者采取常規護理和預見性護理的效果作分析。
1 基本數據與方法
1.1 基本數據
在2015年3月到2017年2月期間選取來我院就診的ICU重癥患者64例,按照計算機表法將其均分2組,各32例。參照組中,男女患者的比例為18:14,最小年齡為40歲,最大年齡為62歲,平均年齡為(43.18±2.59)歲;實驗組中,男女患者的比例為16:16,最小年齡為41歲,最大年齡為64歲,平均年齡為(43.97±2.41)歲。對64例ICU重癥患者的基本數據行統計學軟件分析,組間差異不明顯(p>0.05)。納入標準:病情嚴重,需在ICU病房治療的患者;意識清醒,理解能力正常的患者;對本組研究知情同意,且簽署同意書的患者?!?br>