999精品在线视频,手机成人午夜在线视频,久久不卡国产精品无码,中日无码在线观看,成人av手机在线观看,日韩精品亚洲一区中文字幕,亚洲av无码人妻,四虎国产在线观看 ?

吉西他濱及順鉑經動脈、靜脈注射后血漿、組織藥物濃度的變化

2014-12-15 03:29:44曹軍等
中國醫藥導報 2014年32期
關鍵詞:順鉑

曹軍等

[摘要] 目的 分析不同化療藥物通過動脈及靜脈途徑注射后血漿及組織內藥物濃度的變化情況。 方法 40只帶瘤裸大鼠,隨機分為8組,其中4組為動脈組,另4組為靜脈組,帶瘤裸大鼠分別經動脈及靜脈注射吉西他濱及順鉑。于注射后5、10、20、40、80、120、360、720 min采血液標本,注射后10、40、120、720 min取組織標本,以高效液相色譜法測定血漿及腫瘤組織中吉西他濱濃度,ICP-MS法測定血漿及腫瘤組織中的鉑含量,計算藥代動力學參數。 結果 經動脈及靜脈注射兩種藥物后,血漿及腫瘤組織中的藥物濃度出現規律性變化,其變化過程均可用兩室模型來描述。動脈注射兩組藥物的藥代動力學參數與靜脈注射的藥代動力學參數不同,動脈組注射藥物后,血漿藥物峰濃度[吉西他濱:(20.84±10.11)μg/mL,順鉑:(15.13±7.12)μg/mL]均低于靜脈組[吉西他濱:(28.96±7.02)μg/mL,順鉑:(21.64±9.72)μg/mL],靶組織內藥物峰濃度[吉西他濱:(20.18±9.43)μg/mL,順鉑:(6.98±0.31)μg/mL]均高于靜脈組[吉西他濱:(18.19±10.30)μg/mL,順鉑:(3.04±0.11)μg/mL],靶組織內藥物曲線下面積[吉西他濱:(2641±411)μg/(min·mL),順鉑:(6025±870)μg/(min·mL)]均明顯高于靜脈組[吉西他濱:(1663±568)μg/(min·mL),順鉑:(1780±883)μg/(min·mL)],差異均有統計學意義(P < 0.05或P < 0.01)。 結論 動脈注射吉西他濱和順鉑較靜脈注射有不同程度的優勢,這種優勢與藥物的藥理特性有關。

[關鍵詞] 吉西他濱;順鉑;藥代動力學;動脈注射

[中圖分類號] R730.53 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1673-7210(2014)11(b)-0008-06

[Abstract] Objective To study the drug concentration change of chemotherapeutic agents in plasma and tissue after arterial and intravenous injection. Methods Gemcitabine and Cisplatin were injected into the 40 mature nude rats with xenografted tumor. The rats were divided into vein injection group and artery injection group randomly. The rats were given Gemcitabine and Cisplatin respectively. Blood samples were collected at 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 360, 720 min after injection and the tumor tissue specimens were collected at 10, 40, 120, 720 min after injection. Gemcitabine concentration in plasma and tumor tissues were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, while Cisplatin was determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)method. The data were analyzed by the pharmacokinetic program. Results Regular concentration change of the three drugs in plasma and tissues were observed after the intravenous and arterial injection, which met the two-compartment model. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs after intravenous and arterial injection were different. The peak concentration in plasma of artery injection group [Gemcitabine: (20.84±10.11) μg/mL; Cisplatin: (15.13±7.12) μg/mL] were lower than those of the vein injection group [(Gemcitabine: (28.96±7.02) μg/mL; Cisplatin: (21.64±9.72) μg/mL], the peak concentration in tissues of the arterial injections group [Gemcitabine: (20.18±9.43) μg/mL; Cisplatin: (6.98±0.31) μg/mL] were higher than those of the intravenous injection group [Gemictabine: (18.19±10.30) μg/mL; Cisplation: (3.04±0.11) μg/mL], and area under curve (AUC) value [(Gemcitabine: (2641±411) μg/(min·mL); Cisplatin:(6025±870) μg/(min·mL)], in tissues of the arterial injections group were higher than those of the intravenous injection group [Gemcitabine:(1663±568) μg/(min·mL); Cisplatin: (1780±883) μg/(min·mL)]. Conclusion Intraarterial chemotherapy has advantages to intravenous chemotherapy in gemcitabine and cisplatin. These advantages depend on the drug pharmacological properties.endprint

[Key words] Gemcitabine; Cisplatin; Pharmacokinetics; Intraarterial injection

肺癌在我國居惡性腫瘤死亡的第1位,其發病率仍逐年上升[1]。肺癌分為非小細胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)和小細胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer,SCLC)。非小細胞肺癌占肺癌總數的85%,其中肺腺癌占30%~40%[2]。大多數肺癌患者臨床診斷時往往已屬晚期,喪失了手術治療時機。因此,在肺癌的治療方案選擇中,化療藥物仍然發揮著舉足輕重的作用[3]。吉西他濱聯合順鉑治療肺癌的確切療效在一些中外研究中已得到驗證[4-5],但是兩種藥物不同給藥途徑治療肺癌的療效比較研究卻鮮有報道。本研究通過動物實驗研究吉西他濱及順鉑動脈化療與靜脈化療的藥代動力學表現,比較兩種給藥途徑的藥代動力學特點,以了解動脈化療是否有其優勢。

1 材料與方法

1.1 材料

1.1.1 細胞株

人肺癌細胞珠(A549)購自上海市腫瘤研究所。

1.1.2 實驗動物

裸大鼠40只,8~10周齡,體重(180±15)g,SPF級,雌雄各半,實驗動物購自上海市公共衛生臨床中心實驗動物部。飼養條件:各組鼠均同等自由飲水、攝食,溫度22~25℃,相對濕度40%~50%。

1.1.3 藥物

吉西他濱(商品名:澤菲,江蘇豪森藥業股份有限公司,批號:130611)及順鉑(德州德藥制藥有限公司;批號:WA2A1211085)。

1.2 儀器

Millipore超純水機(美國Millipore公司)、Sigma 3K15高速低溫離心機(德國Sigma公司)、 2695型高效液相色譜儀、2487型紫外檢測器、Millennium 3.2色譜處理軟件(美國waters公司)、BP211D電子分析天平(德國Sartorius公司)、XW-80 A旋渦混合器(上海醫科大學儀器廠)、惠普1100 HPLC系統。不銹鋼手提式壓力蒸汽滅菌器(合肥華泰醫療設備有限公司,YX-280A型)、質譜儀(美國PE公司,DRC Ⅱ型)、離心機(北京醫用離心機廠,型號LD4-2)、潔凈工作臺(蘇州安泰空氣技術有限公司,型號SW-CJ-IFD)、光學顯微鏡(Olympus Optical Co.Ltd.,型號CHS No.100278)。

1.3 方法

1.3.1 細胞培養

將人肺癌A549細胞復蘇,含10%小牛血清的DMEM培養液培養,取生長指數良好的人肺癌A549細胞,用0.25%胰蛋白酶消化,離心,收集細胞用磷酸鹽緩沖液(PBS)稀釋,濃度調整為5×106/mL,每只小鼠以0.2 mL接種于右腋皮下,待腫瘤長至體積約為1000 mm3時移植于裸大鼠耳后造模。

1.3.2 造模

選擇生長良好、瘤結無破潰的荷瘤裸鼠,處死后無菌條件下完整剝離瘤結,剪開瘤結,清除中心壞死組織,在生理鹽水下,用剪刀切成2 mm×2 mm×2 mm瘤組織塊,每只裸大鼠右耳后皮下接種2 mm×2 mm×2 mm瘤組織塊,接種在30 min內完成。正常飼養8 d后動物接種腫瘤成功;待3周后腫瘤長至2650~2800 mm3,保證各組腫瘤平均體積無明顯差異。

1.3.3 給藥及取材

給藥劑量:吉西他濱150 mg/kg,順鉑10 mg/kg。給藥方法:①動脈化療4組,荷瘤大鼠經10%水合氯醛(3.5 g/kg)腹腔注射麻醉后,沿頸部正中切開皮膚,暴露右頸動脈,于右頸動脈采用改良Seldinger技術插管,先造影證實腫瘤供血動脈,再經導管灌注吉西他濱150 mg/kg或順鉑10 mg/kg,緩慢推注,縫合皮膚。②靜脈化療4組,吉西他濱150 mg/kg或順鉑10 mg/kg由尾靜脈注入。裸大鼠體內給藥后獲取標本:將40只裸大鼠隨機分為8組,每組5只。在吉西他濱及順鉑分別動脈及靜脈給藥后5、10、20、40,80、120、360、720 min將裸大鼠獲取血液標本,在10、40、120、720 min將裸大鼠處死獲取腫瘤組織標本。血液收集于肝素抗凝管,離心后獲取血漿。標本冷凍于-20℃冰箱保存。

1.3.4 藥物濃度測定

1.3.4.1 吉西他濱藥物分析 用高效液相色譜法(惠普1100 HPLC系統)測定吉西他濱的血漿藥物濃度。采用惠普 Hypersil ODS分析柱(125 mm×4 mm,5μm)。流動相為水,流速為0.8 mL/min。紫外檢測波長268 nm。測定方法的日間誤差及日內誤差均<10%。血漿樣品的處理:血漿0.5 mL,加入0.1 mg/mL吉西他濱(內標)50 μL,以乙酸乙酯進行萃取,吹干氮氣,用水溶解殘留物后進樣測定。組織標本的處理:在標本組織中分別加入0.1 mg/mL吉西他濱、0.1 mg/mL順鉑各50 μL和水2 mL,剪碎,勻漿30 min,取1 mL均勻血漿液,2000 r/min離心10 min,上清液以乙酸乙酯萃取,其余步驟與血漿樣品處理相同。

1.3.4.2 鉑含量檢測 吸取血漿200 μL,對組織樣本進行稱重,經濕法消解后,利用電感耦合等離子體質譜法(inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry,ICP-MS)進行鉑含量測定,分別以“鉑含量/血漿含量(μg/mL)”、“鉑含量/組織含量(μg/mL)”表示測定結果。通過以下公式將鉑含量換算為藥物含量,結果表示為“藥物含量/血漿含量(μg/mL)”、“藥物含量/組織含量(μg/mL)”:順鉑含量=檢測的鉑含量×300.05/195.08。ICP MS檢測大鼠血漿、腫瘤鉑含量的加標回收率分別為99.70%和97.30%。endprint

1.4 統計學方法

采用SPSS 13.0統計學軟件進行數據分析,計量資料數據用均數±標準差(x±s)表示,兩組間比較采用t檢驗,以P < 0.05為差異有統計學意義。應用DAS 2.0軟件進行藥代動力學分析。

2 結果

2.1 兩組注射化療藥物后血漿及組織中的濃度變化情況比較

動脈及靜脈組注射兩組藥物后,血漿及組織中的藥物濃度出現規律性變化。如藥物在血漿中的濃度變化,藥物在組織中的濃度變化也可用數學模型來描述。吉西他濱血漿及組織中藥物濃度變化符合藥代動力學兩室模型,用藥0~40 min后,靜脈組血漿藥物濃度明顯高于動脈組,并且隨著時間延長,兩組間血漿藥物濃度差異漸消失;藥物注射后動脈組及靜脈組的藥物峰濃度分別為(30.84±10.11)μg/mL及(48.96±7.02)μg/mL,兩組比較差異有高度統計學意義(P < 0.01)。腫瘤組織內藥物濃度水平動脈組與靜脈組相似,峰濃度分別為(20.18±9.43)μg/mL和(18.19±10.30)μg/mL,差異有統計學意義(P < 0.05)。動靜脈組的血漿及組織藥物峰濃度均在注射藥物結束時出現(圖1A~D)。

2.2 兩組注射化療藥物后在組織和血漿中藥代動力學參數比較

兩組注射順鉑后,靜脈組血漿藥物峰濃度明顯高于動脈組,其峰濃度分別為(21.64±9.72)μg/mL和(15.13±7.12)μg/mL,兩組比較差異有高度統計學意義(P < 0.01)。動脈組用藥后10 min左右還可在血漿中見雙峰現象,第2峰低于第1峰。兩組用藥后組織中藥物峰濃度動脈組明顯高于靜脈組,兩組比較差異有高度統計學意義(P < 0.01),因順鉑存在組織吸收過程,靜脈組的組織內藥物峰濃度出現于用藥后約28 min。見圖1A、C。

2.3 兩組注射化療藥物后的藥代動力學參數變化

兩組注射化療藥物后的藥代動力學參數有所差異,從表1可以看出,動靜脈組藥物注射后,組織內藥時曲線下面積(AUC)值動脈組均大于靜脈組;血漿的AUC值動脈組均小于靜脈組。兩組注射藥物后,組織內的藥物消除速率常數(β)值動脈組明顯低于靜脈組,因藥物在動脈組組織內滯留時間延長。

2.4 兩組注射化療藥物后在組織和血漿中峰濃度比值的比較

動脈注射吉西他濱后,藥物在組織與血漿中的峰濃度比值為(0.591±0.106),AUC比值為(4.61±2.07);靜脈注射吉西他濱后,藥物在組織與血漿中的峰濃度比值為(0.412±0.045),AUC比值為(2.31±0.961),動脈組顯著高于靜脈組(P < 0.05)。動脈注射順鉑后,藥物在組織與血漿中的峰濃度比值為(0.463±0.165),AUC比值為(3.58±0.625),靜脈注射順鉑后,藥物在組織與血漿中的峰濃度比值為(0.141±0.062),AUC比值為(2.04±1.66),動脈組顯著高于靜脈組(P < 0.05)。

3 討論

吉西他濱是目前NSCLC治療最有效的第三代化療藥之一。其作用機制是在機體細胞內的核苷激酶作用下生成具有活性的二磷酸核苷(dFdCDP)及三磷酸核苷(dFdCTP),具有抑制細胞DNA合成的聯合作用,從而發揮抗腫瘤作用,主要影響細胞DNA合成期(S期),阻止細胞從G1期進入S期。順鉑屬細胞周期非特異性抗腫瘤藥,作用機制為可將細胞阻滯于S期,因其與其他抗癌藥物無交叉耐藥性,故常與其他藥物聯用共同治療腫瘤[5-8]。1998年美國食品藥品監督管理局(FDA)根據相關臨床試驗結果,批準吉西他濱和順鉑聯合化療作為晚期NSCLC患者一線治療方案。國內外多項體內外研究證實吉西他濱與順鉑聯合用藥可明顯提高生存期,緩解全身癥狀及改善生活質量,治療NSCLC效果明顯優于以往的常規化療方案[9-12]。

隨著介入放射學的發展,經支氣管動脈化療目前已成為治療不可切除性中、晚期肺癌的重要手段[13-15]。但肺癌介入治療的化療用藥方案一般為順鉑、絲裂酶素C、5-氟尿嘧啶、表阿霉素等第二代藥物化療方案[15-16]。吉西他濱動脈灌注給藥已經廣泛用于肝轉移瘤、胰腺癌和膽管腫瘤的介入治療[17-22],但在肺癌的介入治療中鮮有報道。通過對肺癌動物實驗研究吉西他濱動脈用藥與靜脈用藥的藥物代謝動力學研究尚未見報道。在臨床應用中,雖然裸小鼠肺癌模型制作比較成熟,但因其體積小無法行血管造影檢查,不便在血管介入診療領域進行深入研究。其他大型動物卻成瘤困難。本實驗采用A549肺癌細胞株建立裸大鼠耳后移植瘤,建造肺癌模型,成瘤率高,便于動脈插管,它的成功制作有利于肺癌荷瘤動物動脈介入實驗的順利開展。

研究發現動脈化療與靜脈化療相比有獨特優勢[17,23-25]。首先,動脈注射藥物后,靶組織藥物峰濃度較高,滯留時間也較長,有利于其藥效發揮,并且動脈給藥后血漿藥物峰濃度及AUC值相對較低,可減少化療藥物全身毒性。局部組織滯留化療藥物的能力是動脈給藥的主要優勢,而藥物的藥理特性決定化療藥物藥物在組織中的滯留時間。動脈給藥,可使藥物首先從血漿分布至靶組織,再從靶組織進入循環系統,分布到其他組織中去;而對于靜脈注射,化療藥物首先進入循環系統,再分布至靶組織。由于動脈及靜脈注射藥物經歷不同代謝過程,其藥代動力學參數必然有所差異。本研究發現動脈或靜脈注藥后,組織及血漿中藥物濃度出現規律性變化,可以用兩室模型描述其變化過程。另外,本研究也發現藥物濃度在血漿分布相快速降低的同時,組織藥物濃度也快速下降,這可能是由于血漿藥物濃度下降加速了藥物從組織向血漿中的轉運。

吉西他濱和順鉑兩組藥物經頸內動脈及尾靜脈注射后,血漿及組織中的濃度變化有不同特點。吉西他濱注射后,血漿及組織峰濃度均在注射結束后出現,藥物分配快。順鉑注射后,靜脈組靶組織內藥物峰濃度出現于注射后28 min,而動脈組出現于注射完畢時。可見,順鉑靜脈注射后存在較緩慢的組織吸收過程,這可能與順鉑的蛋白結合率高及結合力強有關。動脈注射后,順鉑首先經過靶組織,大量游離順鉑快速分布到靶組織中,而靜脈注射后順鉑首先進入全身循環與血漿蛋白結合,減緩了順鉑在組織的分布速度,并減少其在組織中分布濃度。組織內AUC定義為藥物在組織內濃度和時間的乘積,是組織與藥物接觸程度的量化指標。藥物在組織內的AUC 值與峰濃度可作為藥物對靶組織作用強度的指標,或作為對全身作用強度的指標,也可通過比較靶組織與血漿中藥物的AUC 比值及峰濃度反映動靜脈用藥的優劣。endprint

動脈及靜脈注射吉西他濱和順鉑較靜脈注射有不同程度的優勢。組織內藥代動力學參數α、β值反映組織內藥物向血漿轉運的速度,而血漿內的α、β值反映藥物從血漿向組織的分布速度及藥物從血漿的消除速度,α、β值與藥物從血漿或組織的排除速度呈正相關。本研究發現,動脈注射吉西他濱后,組織內α、β值均小于血漿α、β值,表明動脈注射優勢本質上是藥物在組織中的轉運速率低于藥物在血漿中的分布及消除速率。動脈注射順鉑后,這種優勢體現于有更多游離順鉑進入靶組織中。若將吉西他濱及順鉑聯合治療可能有藥代動力學的互補作用。

[參考文獻]

[1] Di JZ,Peng JY,Wang ZG. Prevalence,clinicopathological characteristics,treatment,and prognosis of intestinal metastasis of primary lung cancer: a comprehensive review [J]. Surgical Oncology,2014,23(2):72-80.

[2] Liu Y,Chen LP. The regulation of cell polarity in the progression of lung cancer [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics,2013,9(Suppl 2):S80-85.

[3] Li W,Liu HY,Jia ZR,et al. Advances in the early detection of lung cancer using analysis of volatile organic compounds:from imaging to sensors [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention:APJCP,2014,15(11):4377-4384.

[4] Zhou M,Ding YJ,Feng Y,et al. Association of xeroderma pigmentosum group D(Asp312Asn,Lys751Gln)and cytidine deaminase(Lys27Gln,Ala70Thr)polymorphisms with outcome in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine [J]. Genetics and Molecular Research:GMR,2014,13(2):3310-3318.

[5] Li Y,Wang LR,Chen J,et al. First-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients [J]. Disease Markers,2014,2014:960458.

[6] Gridelli C,Novello S,Zilembo N,et al. Phase Ⅱ randomized study of vandetanib plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus placebo as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients [J]. Journal of Thoracic Oncology:Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,2014,9(5):733-737.

[7] Juan O,Vidal J,Gisbert R,et al. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with docetaxel and gemcitabine [J]. Clinical & Translational Oncology:official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico,2014,16(7):637-643.

[8] Galvani E,Toffalorio F,Peters GJ,et al. Pharmacogenetics of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC):Time to "Work it Out" ? [J]. Current Pharmaceutical Design,2014,20(24):3863-3874.

[9] Yang F,Li X,Chen KZ,et al. Tolerability and toxicity of adjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine for treating non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Chinese Medical Journal,2013,126(11):2087-2091.

[10] Tang Y,Wang Y,Teng X. Sequencedependent effect of gemcitabine and cisplatin on A549 nonsmallcell lung cancer cells [J]. Molecular Medicine Reports,2013,8(1):221-226.endprint

[11] Morabito A,Gebbia V,Di Maio M,et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2:the CAPPA-2 study [J]. Lung Cancer,2013,81(1):77-83.

[12] Ozkaya S,Findik S,Dirican A,et al. Long-term survival rates of patients with stage Ⅲb and Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine or gemcitabine [J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,2012,4(6):1035-1038.

[13] Wu CF,Lee CH,Hsi E,et al. Interval between intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma:impacts on effectiveness of chemotherapy and on overall survival [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:568145.

[14] Ma MC,Chen YY,Li SH,et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Cisplatin is effective for advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:160138.

[15] Yuan Z,Li WT,Ye XD,et al. Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:preliminary experience on the safety,efficacy,and clinical outcomes [J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology:JVIR,2013,24(10):1521-1528.

[16] Nakanishi MY,oshida Y,Natazuka T. Prospective study of transarterial infusion of docetaxel and cisplatin to treat non-small-cell lung cancer in patients contraindicated for standard chemotherapy [J]. Lung Cancer,2012,77(2):353-358.

[17] Heinrich S,Kraft D,Staib-Sebler E,et al. Phase Ⅱ study on combined intravenous and intra-arterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Hepato-gastroenterology,2013,60(126):1492-1496.

[18] Spada F,Fazio N,Bonomo G,et al. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy in patients with advanced primary liver tumours [J]. Ecancer Medical Science,2012,6:280.

[19] Hong GB,Zhou JX,Sun HB,et al. Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic carcinoma [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention:APJCP,2012,13(6):2669-2673.

[20] Uwagawa T,Misawa T,Tsutsui N,et al. Phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine in combination with regional arterial infusion of nafamostat mesilate for advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. American Journal of Clinical Oncology,2013,36(1):44-48.

[21] Tanaka T,Nishiofuku H,Tamamoto T,et al. Intra-arterial chemoinfusion prior to chemoradiotherapy with full-dose systemic gemcitabine for management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Anticancer Research,2011,31(11):3909-3912.

[22] Guiu B,Vincent J,Guiu S,et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in a large metastasis from colon cancer [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology:WJG,2010, 16(9):1150-1154.

[23] Shields CL,Kaliki S,Al-Dahmash S,et al. Management of advanced retinoblastoma with intravenous chemotherapy then intra-arterial chemotherapy as alternative to enucleation [J]. Retina,2013,33(10):2103-2109.

[24] Shields CL,Fulco EM,Arias JD,et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers with intravenous,intra-arterial,periocular,and intravitreal chemotherapy [J]. Eye,2013,27(2):253-264.

[25] Fiorentini G,Aliberti C,Tilli M,et al. Intra-arterial infusion of irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads(DEBIRI) versus intravenous therapy(FOLFIRI)for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer:final results of a phase Ⅲ study [J]. Anticancer Research,2012,32(4):1387-1395.

(收稿日期:2014-08-07 本文編輯:任 念)endprint

[11] Morabito A,Gebbia V,Di Maio M,et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2:the CAPPA-2 study [J]. Lung Cancer,2013,81(1):77-83.

[12] Ozkaya S,Findik S,Dirican A,et al. Long-term survival rates of patients with stage Ⅲb and Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine or gemcitabine [J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,2012,4(6):1035-1038.

[13] Wu CF,Lee CH,Hsi E,et al. Interval between intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma:impacts on effectiveness of chemotherapy and on overall survival [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:568145.

[14] Ma MC,Chen YY,Li SH,et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Cisplatin is effective for advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:160138.

[15] Yuan Z,Li WT,Ye XD,et al. Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:preliminary experience on the safety,efficacy,and clinical outcomes [J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology:JVIR,2013,24(10):1521-1528.

[16] Nakanishi MY,oshida Y,Natazuka T. Prospective study of transarterial infusion of docetaxel and cisplatin to treat non-small-cell lung cancer in patients contraindicated for standard chemotherapy [J]. Lung Cancer,2012,77(2):353-358.

[17] Heinrich S,Kraft D,Staib-Sebler E,et al. Phase Ⅱ study on combined intravenous and intra-arterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Hepato-gastroenterology,2013,60(126):1492-1496.

[18] Spada F,Fazio N,Bonomo G,et al. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy in patients with advanced primary liver tumours [J]. Ecancer Medical Science,2012,6:280.

[19] Hong GB,Zhou JX,Sun HB,et al. Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic carcinoma [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention:APJCP,2012,13(6):2669-2673.

[20] Uwagawa T,Misawa T,Tsutsui N,et al. Phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine in combination with regional arterial infusion of nafamostat mesilate for advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. American Journal of Clinical Oncology,2013,36(1):44-48.

[21] Tanaka T,Nishiofuku H,Tamamoto T,et al. Intra-arterial chemoinfusion prior to chemoradiotherapy with full-dose systemic gemcitabine for management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Anticancer Research,2011,31(11):3909-3912.

[22] Guiu B,Vincent J,Guiu S,et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in a large metastasis from colon cancer [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology:WJG,2010, 16(9):1150-1154.

[23] Shields CL,Kaliki S,Al-Dahmash S,et al. Management of advanced retinoblastoma with intravenous chemotherapy then intra-arterial chemotherapy as alternative to enucleation [J]. Retina,2013,33(10):2103-2109.

[24] Shields CL,Fulco EM,Arias JD,et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers with intravenous,intra-arterial,periocular,and intravitreal chemotherapy [J]. Eye,2013,27(2):253-264.

[25] Fiorentini G,Aliberti C,Tilli M,et al. Intra-arterial infusion of irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads(DEBIRI) versus intravenous therapy(FOLFIRI)for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer:final results of a phase Ⅲ study [J]. Anticancer Research,2012,32(4):1387-1395.

(收稿日期:2014-08-07 本文編輯:任 念)endprint

[11] Morabito A,Gebbia V,Di Maio M,et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2:the CAPPA-2 study [J]. Lung Cancer,2013,81(1):77-83.

[12] Ozkaya S,Findik S,Dirican A,et al. Long-term survival rates of patients with stage Ⅲb and Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine or gemcitabine [J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,2012,4(6):1035-1038.

[13] Wu CF,Lee CH,Hsi E,et al. Interval between intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma:impacts on effectiveness of chemotherapy and on overall survival [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:568145.

[14] Ma MC,Chen YY,Li SH,et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy with Doxorubicin and Cisplatin is effective for advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma [J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:160138.

[15] Yuan Z,Li WT,Ye XD,et al. Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:preliminary experience on the safety,efficacy,and clinical outcomes [J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology:JVIR,2013,24(10):1521-1528.

[16] Nakanishi MY,oshida Y,Natazuka T. Prospective study of transarterial infusion of docetaxel and cisplatin to treat non-small-cell lung cancer in patients contraindicated for standard chemotherapy [J]. Lung Cancer,2012,77(2):353-358.

[17] Heinrich S,Kraft D,Staib-Sebler E,et al. Phase Ⅱ study on combined intravenous and intra-arterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Hepato-gastroenterology,2013,60(126):1492-1496.

[18] Spada F,Fazio N,Bonomo G,et al. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy in patients with advanced primary liver tumours [J]. Ecancer Medical Science,2012,6:280.

[19] Hong GB,Zhou JX,Sun HB,et al. Continuous transarterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic carcinoma [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention:APJCP,2012,13(6):2669-2673.

[20] Uwagawa T,Misawa T,Tsutsui N,et al. Phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine in combination with regional arterial infusion of nafamostat mesilate for advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. American Journal of Clinical Oncology,2013,36(1):44-48.

[21] Tanaka T,Nishiofuku H,Tamamoto T,et al. Intra-arterial chemoinfusion prior to chemoradiotherapy with full-dose systemic gemcitabine for management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Anticancer Research,2011,31(11):3909-3912.

[22] Guiu B,Vincent J,Guiu S,et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in a large metastasis from colon cancer [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology:WJG,2010, 16(9):1150-1154.

[23] Shields CL,Kaliki S,Al-Dahmash S,et al. Management of advanced retinoblastoma with intravenous chemotherapy then intra-arterial chemotherapy as alternative to enucleation [J]. Retina,2013,33(10):2103-2109.

[24] Shields CL,Fulco EM,Arias JD,et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers with intravenous,intra-arterial,periocular,and intravitreal chemotherapy [J]. Eye,2013,27(2):253-264.

[25] Fiorentini G,Aliberti C,Tilli M,et al. Intra-arterial infusion of irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads(DEBIRI) versus intravenous therapy(FOLFIRI)for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer:final results of a phase Ⅲ study [J]. Anticancer Research,2012,32(4):1387-1395.

(收稿日期:2014-08-07 本文編輯:任 念)endprint

猜你喜歡
順鉑
尼莫斯汀等持續灌注化療治療復發性膠質母細胞瘤的臨床探析
吉西他濱聯合順鉑治療遠處轉移性鼻咽癌的效果觀察
多西他賽聯合順鉑治療晚期頭頸部腫瘤的效果觀察
培美曲塞聯合順鉑與吉西他濱聯合順鉑在非小細胞肺癌治療中的應用分析
吉西他濱或長春瑞濱聯合順鉑治療晚期非小細胞肺癌的臨床效果
細胞自噬與人卵巢癌細胞對順鉑耐藥的關系
紫杉醇聯合順鉑冶療食管癌的效果觀察
順鉑聯合恩度胸腔內灌注治療晚期非小細胞肺癌惡性胸腔積液的臨床觀察
奈達鉑與順鉑同步放化療治療中晚期宮頸癌的療效差異
吉西他濱聯合順鉑治療晚期三陰乳腺癌的療效觀察
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久青青草原亚洲av无码| 福利在线不卡| 中文无码精品A∨在线观看不卡 | 在线观看国产精品日本不卡网| 国产精品lululu在线观看| 久久国产精品嫖妓| 国产美女无遮挡免费视频| 六月婷婷综合| 国产哺乳奶水91在线播放| 一级一级一片免费| 国产精品漂亮美女在线观看| 亚洲三级a| 国产欧美日韩精品第二区| 国产一区二区影院| 国产精品冒白浆免费视频| 亚洲综合天堂网| 欧美另类视频一区二区三区| 国产午夜无码专区喷水| 99色亚洲国产精品11p| 国产精品原创不卡在线| 国产性生大片免费观看性欧美| 国产色网站| 亚洲天堂网在线播放| 午夜精品国产自在| 一级毛片免费观看不卡视频| 国产成人精品一区二区三区| 国内99精品激情视频精品| 国产福利在线观看精品| 99热这里只有免费国产精品| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲电影| 日本欧美精品| 国产一级一级毛片永久| 成年人国产网站| 青青草久久伊人| 亚洲视频二| 91福利片| 亚洲视频二| 国产福利拍拍拍| 麻豆国产精品一二三在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人在线视频| 性色生活片在线观看| 日韩精品成人网页视频在线| 国产欧美日韩va另类在线播放| 永久免费无码成人网站| 欧美成人二区| 色成人亚洲| 精品国产aⅴ一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影在线播放| 97在线免费| 久久综合激情网| 3344在线观看无码| 国产精品高清国产三级囯产AV | 免费视频在线2021入口| 日韩国产综合精选| 天天色天天操综合网| 美女扒开下面流白浆在线试听| 美女一级免费毛片| 99精品视频九九精品| 美女高潮全身流白浆福利区| 国产亚洲视频播放9000| 91免费国产在线观看尤物| 国产精品永久久久久| 国产成人免费| 欧美色综合网站| 中文字幕在线不卡视频| 久久精品娱乐亚洲领先| 98精品全国免费观看视频| 亚洲性一区| 亚洲女同一区二区| 超清无码熟妇人妻AV在线绿巨人| yjizz国产在线视频网| 亚洲AⅤ无码国产精品| 在线免费无码视频| 国产丰满大乳无码免费播放| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区| 国产麻豆精品在线观看| 免费可以看的无遮挡av无码| 中文字幕第1页在线播| 国产午夜一级毛片| 亚洲欧美一区在线| 亚洲成人免费在线| 青草91视频免费观看|