馬平安+呂娜娜

【摘要】 目的 探討急性結石性膽囊炎早期及延期腹腔鏡膽囊切除的效果。方法 92例急性結石性膽囊炎患者, 均行腹腔鏡膽囊切除術治療, 根據發病至手術時間分為早期組(<72 h, 54例)與延期組
(72 h~1周, 38例)。對比兩組手術情況及預后情況。結果 早期組手術用時短于延期組, 膽汁滲出率、中轉開腹率低于延期組, 差異有統計學意義(P<0.05), 兩組術中失血量比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。早期組下床時間、肛門排氣時間、術后住院時間均短于延期組, 差異有統計學意義(P<0.05), 早期組并發癥發生率為20.37%, 延期組為10.53%, 比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 腹腔鏡膽囊切除術為治療急性結石性膽囊炎的有效方法, 早期手術有利于提高手術成功率, 患者術后恢復較快。
【關鍵詞】 急性結石性膽囊炎;早期;延期;腹腔鏡膽囊切除
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.01.006
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the effect of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. Methods A total of 92 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis all received laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and they were divided by time of onset to operation into early group (<72 h,
54 cases) and delayed group (72 h ~1 weeks, 38 cases). Comparison were made on surgical situation and prognosis between two groups. Results Early group had shorter operation time than delayed group, and lower bile exudation rate and conversion rate than delayed group. Their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Both groups had no statistically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume (P>0.05). Early group had shorter off-bed time, anus exhaust time and postoperative hospitalization time than delayed group, and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The early group had incidence of complications as 20.37%, which was 10.53% in delayed group, and the difference was statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an effective method for the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis, and early operation is helpful to improve the success rate of the operation, and the patients recover quickly after the operation.
【Key words】 Acute calculous cholecystitis; Early; Delayed; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
急性結石性膽囊炎是由結石阻塞膽囊管, 造成膽囊內膽汁滯留繼發細菌感染而引起的急性炎癥, 常伴惡心、嘔吐、發熱, 病變發展為膽囊壞疽、穿孔時可導致膽汁性腹膜炎, 加重全身感染癥狀, 威脅患者生命健康。目前對于確診的急性結石性膽囊炎, 臨床首選腹腔鏡膽囊切除術治療, 其具有微創、安全性高、恢復快等優點。但關于膽囊切除最佳時機存在一些爭議, 傳統觀點認為急性結石性膽囊炎早期(發病時間<72 h)為最佳手術時機, 超過72 h應先行保守治療, 并根據炎癥情況擇期手術。但近年來很多學者對此觀點提出異議, 并認為延期手術(發病時間>72 h)并不影響治療效果[1]。本研究回顧性分析本院92例急性結石性膽囊炎患者的臨床資料, 分析急性結石性膽囊炎早期及延期腹腔鏡膽囊切除的效果。報告如下。
1 資料與方法
1. 1 一般資料 回顧性分析2015年1月~2017年4月本院92例急性結石性膽囊炎患者的臨床資料, 根據發病至手術時間分為早期組(<72 h, 54例)與延期組(72 h~1周, 38例)。早期組女37例, 男17例;年齡19~67歲, 平均年齡(44.31±
7.57)歲;……